
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
空军军医大学第一附属医院临床护理学教研室,西安 710032
刘云云,Email:hljys771909@126.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-20,
收稿日期:2023-11-10,
移动端阅览
侯佩, 刘云云. 增强现实技术联合移动交互学习在护生心肺复苏实习教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1275-1280.
Hou Pei, Liu Yunyun. Application of augmented reality technology combined with mobile interactive learning in teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for nursing students on internship[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1275-1280.
侯佩, 刘云云. 增强现实技术联合移动交互学习在护生心肺复苏实习教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1275-1280. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231110-01839.
Hou Pei, Liu Yunyun. Application of augmented reality technology combined with mobile interactive learning in teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for nursing students on internship[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1275-1280. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231110-01839.
目的
2
探究增强现实(augmented reality,AR)技术联合移动交互学习在护生心肺复苏(cardio pulmonary resuscitation,CPR)实习教学中的应用效果。
方法
2
选取2022年6月至2023年3月实习的护生为研究对象,2022年11月前实习的150名护生纳入对照组,接受CPR常规带教;将2022年11月至2023年3月实习的150名护生纳入观察组,接受基于AR技术联合移动交互学习的心肺复苏带教。比较培训后两组护生模拟抢救时各项操作时间、操作失误率及培训态度差异;比较两组护生理论知识、CPR实践操作成绩差异及CPR施救时自我效能感差异;比较培训后15 d、1个月、3个月时CPR相关知识保留程度差异。采用SPSS 23.0进行
t
检验、方差分析、卡方或Fisher精确概率检验。
结果
2
培训后,观察组护生模拟抢救时各项操作时间、操作失误率(8.00% vs. 16.67%)均低于对照组(
P
<
0.05),观察组护生培训态度得分高于对照组(
P
<
0.05);培训后,两组护生理论成绩[(78.81±5.48) vs. (66.66±5.23)
]
、实践操作指标按压深度[(5.62±1.06) cm vs
.
(5.16±0.94) cm
]
、胸廓回弹程度[(98.73±7.82)% vs. (85.67±7.06)%
]
以及自我效能感评分均升高,且观察组高于对照组(
P
<
0.05),两组护生实践操作指标按压频率[(118.73±10.43)次/min vs
.
(126.19±10.79)次/min
]
、通气量[
(608.94±56.49) mL/次 vs. (673.77±57.76) mL/次
]
均降低,且观察组低于对照组(
P
<
0.05);培训后15 d、1个月、3个月时,两组护生知识保留程度均下降,且对照组低于同期观察组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
针对护理本科实习生实行基于AR技术联合移动交互学习的CPR教学,能转变护生对CPR的培训态度和操作时的自我效能感,降低操作时间和操作失误,提高对CPR的认知能力和实践操作能力,在CPR培训中是一种可行、有效的方式。
Objective
2
To explore the application effects of augmented reality (AR) technology combined with mobile interactive learning in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) teaching for nursing students on internship.
Methods
2
We assigned 150 nursing interns between June 2022 and November 2022 to receive conventional CPR teaching (control group) and 150 nursing interns between November 2022 and March 2023 to receive CPR teaching based on AR technology combined with mobile interactive learning (observation group). The two groups were compared for the following indicators: time spent on individual procedures and practice error rate during rescue simulation and post-training attitude; theoretical knowledge
CPR practice score
and CPR self-efficacy; and CPR knowledge retention levels at 15 days
1 month
and 3 months after training. SPSS 23.0 was used to perform the
t
-test
analysis of variance
chi-square test
and Fisher's exact test.
Results
2
After training
the observation group showed a significantly shorter time spent on each procedure
a significantly lower practice error rate (8.00% vs. 16.67%)
and significantly higher post-training attitude scores than the control group (all
P
<
0.05). After training
the observation group had significantly higher scores than the control group in the theoretical score [(78.81±5.48) points vs. (66.66±5.23) points
P
<
0.05
]
compression depth [(5.62±1.06) cm vs. (5.16±0.94) cm
P
<
0.05
]
the degree of chest rebound [(98.73±7.82)% vs. (85.67±7.06)%
P
<
0.05
]
and self-efficacy scores (
P
<
0.05)
which were all increased compared with pre-training values; and the observation group had significantly lower scores than the control group in compression frequency [(118.73±10.43) times/min vs. (126.19±10.79) times/min
P
<
0.05
]
and ventilation volume [(608.94±56.49) mL/time vs. (673.77±57.76) mL/time
P
<
0.05
]
which were all decreased compared with pre-training values. At 15 days
1 month
and 3 months after training
the knowledge retention levels of nursing students were declined in both groups
and were significantly lower in the control group than in the observation group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusions
2
The implementation of CPR teaching based on AR technology combined with mobile interactive learning for undergraduate nursing interns can improve their attitude towards CPR training and self-efficacy during practice
reduce practice time and errors
and enhance cognitive ability and practical ability for CPR
which is a feasible and effective method for CPR training.
心肺复苏护生教育增强现实技术移动交互学习心脏骤停
Cardiopulmonary resuscitationNursing student educationAugmented reality technologyMobile interactive learningCardiac arrest
Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, et al. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: a randomized trial [J]. Resuscitation, 2019, 135: 153-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.033http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.033.
章楠, 邵俊, 何利琴, 等. 自动心肺复苏机的加入在院外急救中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(9): 1159-1162, 1175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.09.010http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.09.010.
封彬, 高文慧, 徐佳丽, 等. 多模式教学在高职学生心肺复苏技能培训中的应用[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(1): 117-120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.01.029http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.01.029.
苑博, 曹兵, 周盛源, 等. 基于AR导航技术的椎弓根螺钉置入术在脊柱外科规培医生教学中的应用和效果评价[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2022, 43(10): 1157-1159. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2022.10.033http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2022.10.033.
吴立权, 徐海涛, 张文斐, 等. 移动增强现实技术在神经解剖教学中的应用效果研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2022, 21(5): 521-524. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200720-00841http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200720-00841.
周熹, 刘书中, 王以朋, 等. 增强现实/混合现实技术在骨肿瘤外科手术规划及教学培训中的应用[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2021, 14(5): 452-456. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2021.05.26http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2021.05.26.
陈娇娇, 黄欢欢, 康简, 等. 案例导入法在患者安全课程教学中的应用探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020, 19(11): 1271-1274. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191225-00296http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191225-00296.
Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care [J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(18 Suppl 2): S414-S435. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.
许虹. 急危重症护理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007.
Vestergaard LD, Løfgren B, Jessen CL, et al. A comparison of pediatric basic life support self-led and instructor-led training among nurses [J]. Eur J Emerg Med, 2017, 24(1): 60-66. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000294http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000294.
Chien CY, Fang SY, Tsai LH, et al. Traditional versus blended CPR training program: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study [J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 10032. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67193-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67193-1.
于文蓁, 龚琳, 张莹莹. 公众心肺复苏知识、意愿及自我效能的调查[J]. 中国医药导报, 2015, 12(35): 39-43.
邓小娥, 黄玲, 林景, 等. 情景模拟联合口诀法对ICU实习护生心肺复苏培训的效果[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(5): 54-57. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.05.054http://dx.doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.05.054.
吴文娟, 张娜, 朱燕燕, 等. 增强现实技术结合翻转课堂式教学法在护士临床心肺复苏教学中的应用[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(19): 2325-2328. DOI: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2022.19.27http://dx.doi.org/10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2022.19.27.
刘耕, 王聪, 孟祥宇, 等. 不同音乐辅助心肺复苏培训对学员远期按压效果和操作信心的影响[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(2): 264-268. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.02.032http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.02.032.
梁晨, 李扩, 牛晨, 等. 多模态影像融合+增强现实技术在神经外科住院医师规范化培训PBL教学中的应用[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2022, 36(1): 88-91, 106. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202201019http://dx.doi.org/10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202201019.
Moon H, Hyun HS. Nursing students' knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2019, 19(1): 414. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621