
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
北京大学第三医院妇产科,北京 100049
张龑,Email:Zhangyann01@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-01-20,
收稿日期:2022-05-20,
扫 描 看 全 文
刘春雨, 张龑. 妇产科规范化培训医师工作压力现状与影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(1): 51-55.
Liu Chunyu, Zhang Yan. Study on the status quo and influencing factors of work stress of residents in the standardized training of obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(1):51-55.
刘春雨, 张龑. 妇产科规范化培训医师工作压力现状与影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(1): 51-55. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220520-01576.
Liu Chunyu, Zhang Yan. Study on the status quo and influencing factors of work stress of residents in the standardized training of obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(1):51-55. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220520-01576.
目的
2
调查妇产科规范化培训医师工作压力现状,分析影响其工作压力的因素。
方法
2
选取2019年6月至2020年5月北京市某三甲医院规范化培训基地的住院医师232名为研究对象。采用问卷调查方法,收集一般情况,包括性别、年龄、专业、学历、工作经历、规培时间、收入满意度和对规培必要性的认同度。通过工作压力源量表进行压力现状与影响因素分析。其中工作压力源量表得分越低,反映其压力越大。采用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行
t
检验和卡方检验。
结果
2
妇产科规培医师工作压力总分在所有科室中偏低(67.02±12.65)分(
P
<
0.001),其中“工作量及时间分配”(7.11±2.42)分、“工作环境及资源”(7.21±2.34)分、“管理及人际关系”(15.66±3.69)分为主要压力源,与其他各科室比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001)。单因素分析结果显示:不同收入满意度之间工作压力得分差异有统计学意义(
P
=0.003)。结合多重线性回归方程结果,收入满意度不同的妇产科规培医师在“专业及工作”“工作量及时间分配”和“工作环境及资源”3方面压力源总分随满意度下降,得分越低压力越大,差异有统计学意义(
P
值分别为0.006、0.008、0.012)。而涉及“病人诊疗”和“管理及人际关系”方面,收入满意度不同的规培医师总分差异无统计学意义(
P
值分别为0.067和0.057)。
结论
2
妇产科规培医师压力普遍偏大,来自临床与医疗相关的事务是其工作压力的主要来源,而收入满意度是其工作压力的主要影响因素。
Objective
2
To investigate and analyze the status quo of work stress and its influencing factors among residents in the standardized training of obstetrics and gynecology.
Methods
2
A questionnaire survey was carried out among 232 training residents by random sampling from a standardized training base of a tertiary hospital in Beijing from June 2019 to May 2020. The collected general information included gender
age
specialty
education background
work experience
time of training
income satisfaction and recognition of the necessity of training. The current situation and influencing factors of pressure were analyzed through the work pressure source scale. The lower the score means the greater stress. SPSS 22.0 was used to process the data by performing
t
-test and Chi-square test.
Results
2
The total points of work stress (67.02±12.65) of the residents was lower among all the departments (
P
<
0.001). The most important work stressors were workload and time allocation (7.11±2.42)
job situation and resources (7.21±2.34)
management and personal relationship (15.66±3.69)
and those were significantly different in any other departments (
P
=0.003). One-way analysis of variances showed that job stress scores were significantly different among types of income satisfaction (
P
=0.003). Combined with the results of logistic regression equation
the total scores of work stressors in such three aspects as "specialty and career"
"workload and time allocation"
and "job situation and resources" decreased with the satisfaction
and the lower the score
the greater the pressure
with statistical significance (
P
=0.006
0.008
0.012
respectively). However
in terms of "patient diagnosis and treatment"
and "management and interpersonal relationship"
there was no significant difference between the groups (
P
=0.067
0.057
respectively).
Conclusions
2
The stress of obstetrics and gynecology residents is generally high. Clinical and medical affairs are the main sources of their work stress
and income satisfaction is the major influencing factor of the work stress.
工作压力源规范化培训医师妇产科
Work stressorResidentObstetrics and gynecology
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 关于建立住院医师规范化培训制度的指导意见[EB/OL].(2014-01-17)[2022-06-11]. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/qjjys/s3593/201401/032c8cdf2eb64a369cca4f9b76e8b059.shtmlhttp://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/qjjys/s3593/201401/032c8cdf2eb64a369cca4f9b76e8b059.shtml.
包润发, 董平, 赵恩昊, 等. 上海市外科住院医师规范化培训10年实践与经验[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(1): 56-62. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2022.01.10http://dx.doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2022.01.10.
陈皓阳, 穆林, 莫雯茜, 等. 我国住院医师规范化培训现状的系统评价[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2022, 39(1): 73-77.
张春丽. 北京地区三甲医院临床医师工作倦怠、压力源现状及对策研究[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2007.
董杰, 朱洁, 张曼华. 2015年北京市三级医院住院医师工作压力源现状分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2017, 24(2): 160-163. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2017.02.009http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2017.02.009.
郭海燕, 谷蓓蓓, 张新庆, 等. 住院医师规范化培训中的问题与对策[J]. 现代医院管理, 2015, 13(4): 10-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4232.2015.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4232.2015.04.003.
李梦莹, 陈亚伟, 张莉, 等. 医生职业倦怠与医患关系认知的相关性研究[J]. 医学与哲学, 2019, 40(11): 50-54. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2019.11.13http://dx.doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2019.11.13.
Chen KY, Yang CM, Lien CH, et al. Burnout, job satisfaction, and medical malpractice among physicians [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2013, 10(11): 1471-1478. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6743http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6743.
Menon NK, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA, et al. Association of physician burnout with suicidal ideation and medical errors [J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(12): e2028780. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28780http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28780.
Bateman EA, Viana R. Burnout among specialists and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a systematic review [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2019, 51(11): 869-874. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2614http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2614.
Smeds MR, Janko MR, Allen S, et al. Burnout and its relationship with perceived stress, self-efficacy, depression, social support, and programmatic factors in general surgery residents [J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 219(6): 907-912. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.004.
Zhou AY, Panagioti M, Esmail A, et al. Factors associated with burnout and stress in trainee physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(8): e2013761. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13761http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13761.
Corgan S , Winkel AF , Sugarman R ,et al.Anxiety in Residents in China: prevalence and risk factors in a multicenter study [J].Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2021(5): 96.
Lou NM, Montreuil T, Feldman LS, et al. Nurses' and physicians' distress, burnout, and coping strategies during COVID-19: stress and impact on perceived performance and intentions to quit [J]. J Contin Educ Health Prof, 2022, 42(1): e44-e52. DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000365http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000365.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621