
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院护理部,重庆 401147
2.重庆医科大学护理学院,重庆400016
3.重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科,重庆 400016
刘玮楚,Email:202963@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2023-02-20,
收稿日期:2020-09-01,
扫 描 看 全 文
杨冰, 李福英, 谢世麒, 等. 促进护生学习获得感和实践能力:探究式学习社区的构建及实证研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(2): 315-320.
Yang Bing, Li Fuying, Xie Shiqi, et al. Promoting learning gains and practical ability of nursing students: the construction and empirical research of inquiry learning community[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(2):315-320.
杨冰, 李福英, 谢世麒, 等. 促进护生学习获得感和实践能力:探究式学习社区的构建及实证研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(2): 315-320. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn英文已校 202007197杨冰YYT-返修搞.
Yang Bing, Li Fuying, Xie Shiqi, et al. Promoting learning gains and practical ability of nursing students: the construction and empirical research of inquiry learning community[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(2):315-320. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200901-01200.
目的
2
在《护理临床综合实验》课程中构建以学习体验为中心的探究式学习社区,验证该教学模式对护生学习获得感和实践能力的影响。
方法
2
纳入重庆医科大学护理专业本科三年级的132名学生,使用Minitab 14.0软件将参与者随机分配到学习社区组(
n
=69)和对照组(
n
=63)。学习社区组学生构建按照课程地图进行线上自主学习、小组主题讨论和技能练习相结合的探究式学习社区;对照组接受线下理论讲授、操作示教及技能练习这种以教师为主导的教学模式。教学干预后两组学生均接受学习收获评估问卷调查及综合实验能力测评。使用SPSS 23.0进行卡方检验或配对
t
检验。
结果
2
与对照组相比,学习社区组学生报告学习获得感增强(
P
<
0.001,Cohen
d
=0.97),子条目显示对学习内容的理解(
P<
0.001,Cohen
d
=1.22)、课程总体情况(
P
<
0.001,Cohen
d
=0.90)、课程活动(
P
<
0.001,Cohen
d
=0.83)、获取的信息(
P
<
0.001,Cohen
d
=1.16)效应值差异有统计学意义。学习社区组学生综合实验的实践能力测评总分明显提升(
P
=0.005,Cohen
d
=0.51),其中实验情景演示(
P
=0.002,Cohen
d
=0.55)及实验效果(
P
=0.006;Cohen
d
=0.49)均优于对照组,两组学生在实验准备和案例分析表现上差异无统计学意义。
结论
2
在护理临床综合实验中创建探究式学习社区可有效增进学生的学习获得感并促进临床实践能力的提升。
Objective
2
To develop an inquiry learning community centered on learning experience in the course of
Nursing Clinical Comprehensive Experiment
to verify the influence of this teaching mode on the learning gains and practical ability of nursing students.
Methods
2
A total of 132 undergraduate nursing students form grade 3 in Chongqing Medical University were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to a learning community group (
n
= 69) and a control group (
n
= 63) using Minitab 14.0 software. The students in the learning community group adopted the inquiry learning community mode in accordance with the curriculum map for online self-learning
group discussion and skills practice
while the control group received the teacher-led teaching mode for offline theory teaching
operation teaching and skills practice. After the teaching intervention
both groups of students received the assessment questionnaire of learning gains and the comprehensive experimental ability evaluation. Chi-square test or paired
t
-test was performed using SPSS 23.0.
Results
2
Compared with the control group
students in the learning community group reported that their sense of learning gain was enhanced (
P
<
0.001
Cohen
d
=0.97); sub-items showed that the effect size for the understanding of learning content (
P
<
0.001
Cohen
d
=1.22)
the overall course situation (
P
<
0.001
Cohen
d
=0.90)
the course activities (
P
=0.000
Cohen
d
=0.83)
and the information obtained (
P
<
0.001
Cohen
d
=1.16) was significantly different. The total score of practical ability of comprehensive experiment was significantly improved (
P
= 0.005
Cohen
d
=0.51)
in which the experimental situation displays (
P
=0.002
Cohen
d
=0.55) and experimental effect (
P
=0.006
Cohen
d
=0.49) were better than the control group. There was no significant difference in the performance of experimental preparation and case analysis between the two groups.
Conclusion
2
Developing an inquiry learning community in nursing clinical comprehensive experiment can effectively enhance student' sense of learning gains and promote the improvement of clinical practical ability.
探究式学习社区护理课程地图学习获得感实践能力
Inquiry learning communityNursingCurriculum mapSense of learning gainPractical ability
Bogossian F, Cooper S, Cant R, et al. Undergraduate nursing students' performance in recognising and responding to sudden patient deterioration in high psychological fidelity simulated environments: an Australian multi-centre study [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2014, 34(5): 691-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.015.
Chua WL, MacKey S, Ng EKet al. Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study [J]. Int Nurs Rev, 2013, 60(4): 501-509. DOI: 10.1111/inr.12061http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/inr.12061.
Cooper S, Kinsman L, Buykx P, et al. Managing the deteriorating patient in a simulated environment: nursing students' knowledge, skill and situation awareness [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2010, 19(15/16): 2309-2318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03164.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03164.x.
Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2017, 49: 63-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015.
Starkweather A, Sargent L, Nye C, et al. Progressive assessment and competency evaluation framework for integrating simulation in nurse practitioner education [J]. J Nurse Pract, 2017, 13(7): e301-e310. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.04.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.04.012.
Rutherford-Hemming T, Alfes CM, Breymier TL. A systematic review of the use of standardized patients as a simulation modality in nursing education [J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2019, 40(2): 84-90. DOI: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000401http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000401.
Barton G, Bruce A, Schreiber R. Teaching nurses teamwork: Integrative review of competency-based team training in nursing education [J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2018, 32: 129-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.019.
杨冰, Huang ZH, 唐娇, 等. 中澳护生对病情骤变患者护理知识掌握情况的对比分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2019, 18(5): 488-492. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.05.015http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.05.015.
Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions [J]. Internet High Educ, 2007, 10(3): 157-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001.
Vogt G, Atwong C, Fuller J. Student assessment of learning gains (SALGains) [J]. Bus Commun Qu, 2005, 68(1): 36-43. DOI: 10.1177/1080569904273332http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569904273332.
王聪, 杨冰, 沈军. 综合性实验评价指标在“护理学基础”综合实验考评中的应用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2014, 30(4): 66-68. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2014.04.028http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2014.04.028.
Alemán JLF, de Gea JMC, Mondéjar JJR. Effects of competitive computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2011, 31(8): 866-871. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.026.
Ramirez MSK. Influence of undergraduate nursing student teaching methods on learning standard precautions and transmission-based precautions: experimental research [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2018, 61: 101-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.007.
Christiansen A, Bell A. Peer learning partnerships: exploring the experience of pre-registration nursing students [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2010, 19(5/6): 803-810. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02981.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02981.x.
Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Diaz SR, et al. Developing a Community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry Framework using a multi-institutional sample [J]. Internet High Educ, 2008, 11(3/4): 133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621