
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
安顺学院教育管理系
纸质出版日期:2013,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]全小山,师文慧,柴洁余,何飞.不同数字格式下SNARC效应的实验研究[J].保健医学研究与实践,2013,10(04):25-26+29.
QUAN Xiao-shan, SHI Wen-hui, CHAI Jie-yu, et al. Experimental Study of SNARC Effect in Different Numerical Formats[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2013,10(4):25-26.
目的考察在不同数字格式下是否会产生空间数字反应编码联合效应(SNARC效应)
探讨SNARC效应是否具有广泛性。方法采用2×2×2×4的4因素实验设计
通过0
9
的骰子和听力数字的奇偶判断
分别进行测试研究。结果错误率数据占全部数据的2.76%。反应手主效应显著(F=7.66
p
<
0.01);数字大小主效应显著(F=6.68
p
<
0.01);反应手与数字大小交互作用显著(F=9.58
p
<
0.01);奇偶性主效应显著(F=5.78
p
<
0.01);奇偶性和数字大小交互作用显著(F=10.78
p
<
0.01);刺激材料、数字大小和奇偶性的交互作用显著(F=35.56
p
<
0.01);其余主效应不显著。在骰子点和听力数字刺激条件下
数字大小与反应手的交互作用显著。结论在骰子点和听力数字条件下都会产生SNARC效应
证明SNARC效应具有广泛性。
Objective To explore whether spatial numerical association of response codes effect(SNARC effect)exists in different numerical formats and to explore whether the SNARC effect has universality or not.Method A test research was conducted using the experimental design of four factors 2×2×2×4and through the dice0
9
and judging odd number or even number of the hearing number respectively.Results Data with an error rate accounted for 2.76%of all data.Main effect of response hand was significant(F=7.66
p
<
0.01);that of numerical magnitude was significant(F=6.68
p
<
0.01);interaction effect between response hand and numerical magnitude was significant(F=9.58
p
<
0.01);the main effect of parity was significant(F=5.78
p
<
0.01);interaction effect between parity and numerical magnitude was significant(F=10.78
p
<
0.01);interaction effects in stimulus
numerical magnitude and parity were significant(F=35.56
p
<
0.01);other main effects were insignificant.Interaction effect between numerical magnitude and response hand was significant under conditions of dice dot and hearing number stimulus.Conclusion SNARC effect will occur under conditions of dice dot and hearing number
so it proves that the SNARC effect has universality.
数字加工SNARC效应
Numerical processingSNARC effect
0
浏览量
92
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621