
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
重庆医科大学附属第二医院眼科,重庆 400010
王茜,Email:cqopthwq@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2023-09-20,
收稿日期:2022-07-11,
扫 描 看 全 文
王梦蕾, 黎梦, 王茜. Mini-CEX联合DOPS在感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习中的实践研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1361-1364.
Wang Menglei, Li Meng, Wang Qian. Effect of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise combined with direct observation of procedural skills in ophthalmology practice training in integrated teaching of sensory system diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1361-1364.
王梦蕾, 黎梦, 王茜. Mini-CEX联合DOPS在感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习中的实践研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1361-1364. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021.
Wang Menglei, Li Meng, Wang Qian. Effect of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise combined with direct observation of procedural skills in ophthalmology practice training in integrated teaching of sensory system diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1361-1364. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021‐20220711‐01419.
目的
2
探索基于临床演练评估(mini-clinical evaluation exercise,Mini-CEX)联合操作技能直接观察评估(direct observation of procedural skills,DOPS)在感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习阶段培训的效果。
方法
2
选取进入重庆医科大学第二临床学院感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习阶段的五年制医学生作为研究组,前期(2020年10月至2021年7月)实习的五年制医学生作为对照组。比较两组出科考试成绩、研究组递进式阶段评价结果、实习满意度等。使用SPSS 23.0进行
t
检验。
结果
2
研究组实习生无论是在病史询问,还是病历书写及操作技能方面,成绩均优于对照组(
t
=2.47,
P
=0.016;
t
=5.26,
P
<
0.001;
t
=2.20,
P
=0.031)。在递进式培训中,第二次递进式形成性评价中Mini-CEX及DOPS分数均优于第一次(
t
=-21.06,
P
<
0.001;
t
=-15.09,
P
<
0.001)。第二次测评时实习生对自身表现的满意度及考官对实习生的满意度均优于第一次(
t
=-5.53,
P
<
0.001;
t
=-8.19,
P
<
0.001)。
结论
2
基于Mini-CEX联合DOPS用于感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习阶段培训中效果较好,值得推广。
Objective
2
To investigate the effect of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) combined with direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in ophthalmology practice training in the integrated teaching of sensory system diseases.
Methods
2
The medical students in the five-year program who entered the stage of ophthalmology practice in the integrated teaching of sensory system diseases in The Second Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University
were selected as research group
and the medical students in the five-year program who received training from October 2020 to July 2021 were selected as control group. The two groups were compared in terms of department examination score
progressive evaluation of the research group
and the degree of satisfaction with practice. SPSS 23.0 was used for the
t
-test.
Results
2
Compared with the control group
the research group had significantly better scores of medical history inquiry
medical record writing
and operational skills (
t
=2.47
P
=0.016;
t
=5.26
P
<
0.001;
t
=2.20
P
=0.031). In progressive training
the Mini-CEX and DOPS scores in the second progressive formative assessment were better than those in the first assessment (
t
=-21.06
P
<
0.001;
t
=-15.09
P
<
0.001). The degree of satisfaction with performance among the interns and the degree of satisfaction with interns among the examiners in the second assessment were better than those in the first assessment (
t
=-5.53
P
<
0.001;
t
=-8.19
P
<
0.001).
Conclusion
2
Mini-CEX combined with DOPS has a good effect in ophthalmology practice training in the integrated teaching of sensory system diseases and thus holds promise for application.
Mini-CEX联合DOPS感官系统疾病整合教学眼科实习
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise combined with direct observation of procedural skillsSensory system diseaseIntegrated teachingOphthalmology practice
Latif A, Hopkins L, Robinson D, et al. Influence of trainer role, subspecialty and hospital status on consultant workplace-based assessment completion [J]. J Surg Educ, 2019, 76(4): 1068-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.01.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.01.013.
Jasemi M, Ahangarzadeh Rezaie S, Hemmati Maslakpak M, et al. Are workplace-based assessment methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) effective in nursing students' clinical skills? A single-blind randomized, parallel group, controlled trial [J]. Contemp Nurse, 2019, 55(6): 565-575. DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2020.1735941http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2020.1735941.
Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Mooser B, et al. Influences on the implementation of Mini-CEX and DOPS for postgraduate medical trainees' learning: a grounded theory study [J]. Med Teach, 2019, 41(4): 448-456. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497784http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497784.
佘君, 洪群英, 郑玉英, 等. 基于MiniCEX-DOPS的形成性评价在呼吸与危重症医学科住院医师规范化培训中的探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2021, 20(7): 826-829. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200325-00556http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200325-00556.
郭开华, 黎孟枫, 吴敏昊. 整合医学背景下的医学教育改革和实践[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018, 17(2): 113-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2018.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2018.02.002.
Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: a qualitative synthesis [J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(4): 414-420. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901.
Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review [J]. BMJ, 2010, 341: c5064. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5064http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5064.
Bindal T, Wall D, Goodyear HM. Trainee doctors' views on workplace-based assessments: are they just a tick box exercise? [J]. Med Teach, 2011, 33(11): 919-927. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.558140http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558140.
Weissenbacher A, Bolz R, Zimmermann A, et al. Mentoring and workplace-based assessments for final year medical students: an effective way to increase satisfaction and competence? [J]. Anaesthesist, 2021, 70(6): 486-496. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00902-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00902-7.
Pernar LI, Peyre SE, Warren LE, et al. Mini-clinical evaluation exercise as a student assessment tool in a surgery clerkship: lessons learned from a 5-year experience [J]. Surgery, 2011, 150(2): 272-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.012.
Weijs CA, Coe JB, Hecker KG. Final-year students' and clinical instructors' experience of workplace-based assessments used in a small-animal primary-veterinary-care clinical rotation [J]. J Vet Med Educ, 2015, 42(4): 382-392. DOI: 10.3138/jvme.1214-123R1http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1214-123R1.
McNulty JA, Espiritu BR, Hoyt AE, et al. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course [J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2015, 8(1): 37-44. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1442http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.1442.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621