
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.陆军军医大学大坪医院康复理疗科,重庆 400042
2.陆军军医大学大坪医院医研部,重庆 400042
高长越,Email:gaochangyue1990@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-09-20,
收稿日期:2021-12-12,
扫 描 看 全 文
廖伶艺, 吕雪, 高长越. 微信结合TBL教学在康复治疗专业临床带教中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1365-1368.
Liao Lingyi, Lü Xue, Gao Changyue. Application of WeChat combined with team-based learning in the teaching of rehabilitation therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1365-1368.
廖伶艺, 吕雪, 高长越. 微信结合TBL教学在康复治疗专业临床带教中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1365-1368. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021.
Liao Lingyi, Lü Xue, Gao Changyue. Application of WeChat combined with team-based learning in the teaching of rehabilitation therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1365-1368. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021‐20211212‐01420.
目的
2
探讨微信结合TBL教学在康复治疗专业临床带教中的应用效果。
方法
2
以我科实习的40名康复治疗专业学生为研究对象,分为对照组(
n
=20)和试验组(
n
=20)。对照组采用传统讲授式教学,试验组采用微信结合TBL教学。所有学生在临床实习轮转结束后统一进行出科考试及满意度调查。使用SPSS 26.0进行
t
检验和卡方检验。
结果
2
试验组出科考试成绩优于对照组[(74.3±4.9) vs. (62.4±5.2),
P
<
0.001],主要体现在病例分析[(18.3±2.1) vs. (15.2±1.9),
P
<
0.001]、实践操作[(19.3±2.1) vs. (14.8±2.4),
P
<
0.001]、医患沟通[(17.8±2.4) vs. (14.1±2.4),
P
<
0.001] 3个方面。试验组实习生满意度调查总分优于对照组[(79.6±4.8) vs. (71.2±3.5),
P
<
0.001]。
结论
2
微信结合TBL教学能显著改善康复治疗专业临床带教教学效果,有利于提高学生病例分析、实践操作和医患沟通能力。
Objective
2
To investigate the application effect of WeChat combined with team-based learning (TBL) in the teaching of rehabilitation therapy.
Methods
2
A total of 40 students majoring in rehabilitation therapy who studied in our department were selected and divided into control group and experimental group
with 20 students in each group. The students in the control group received lecture-based learning
and those in the experimental group received WeChat combined with TBL. At the end of training
department examination and satisfaction investigation were performed for all students. SPSS 26.0 was used to perform the
t
-test and the chi-square test.
Results
2
Compared with the control group
the experimental group had a significantly better score of department examination (74.3±4.9 vs. 62.4±5.2
P
<
0.001)
which was reflected in the three aspects of case analysis (18.3±2.1 vs. 15.2±1.9
P
<
0.001)
clinical practice (19.3±2.1 vs. 14.8±2.4
P
<
0.001)
and doctor-patient communication (17.8±2.4 vs. 14.1±2.4
P
<
0.001). Compared with the control group
the experimental group had a significantly better total score of satisfaction investigation (79.6±4.8 vs. 71.2±3.5
P
<
0.001).
Conclusion
2
The teaching method of WeChat combined with TBL can improve the teaching effect of rehabilitation therapy and help to enhance the abilities for case analysis
clinical practice
and doctor-patient communication among students.
基于团队的学习微信医学教育康复治疗
Team-based learningWeChatMedical educationRehabilitation therapy
Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020, 20(suppl 2): 461. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review [J]. Acad Med, 2014, 89(4): 678-688. DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000162http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000162.
Burgess A, Bleasel J, Hickson J, et al. Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020, 20(1): 492. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
Considine J, Berry D, Allen J, et al. Team-based learning in nursing education: a scoping review [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2021, 30(7/8): 903-917. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15599http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15599.
Burgess A, Bleasel J, Haq I, et al. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2017, 17(1): 243. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z.
张明, 唐子人. 微信结合CBL及TBL教学法在急诊住院医师培训中的应用[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 264-267. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.02.031http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.02.031.
孙丽娟, 杜红俊, 周健. 基于微信的PBL和TBL教学法在眼科见习教学中的应用[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2020, 34(2): 214-216, 220. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202002024http://dx.doi.org/10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202002024.
谢羽婕, 张驰, 汪丽, 等. TBL教学模式对康复治疗学本科生教学效果的影响[J]. 中国康复, 2020, 35(4): 217-220. DOI: 10.3870/zgkf.2020.04.013http://dx.doi.org/10.3870/zgkf.2020.04.013.
李莉, 林志艳, 杨雅丽, 等. TBL联合CBL教学模式在医学影像学教学中应用的研究[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(33): 13-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.33.007http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.33.007.
李维卿, 陈军, 朱青子, 等. TBL、CBL与PBL融合教学法在临床八年制病理实习课中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2019, 11(1): 24-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2019.01.011http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2019.01.011.
Burgess A, Haq I, Bleasel J, et al. Team-based learning (TBL): a community of practice [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2019, 19(1): 369. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4.
Reimschisel T, Herring AL, Huang J, et al. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education [J]. Med Teach, 2017, 39(12): 1227-1237. DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2017.1340636http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2017.1340636.
Roberts C, Jorm C, Gentilcore S, et al. Peer assessment of professional behaviours in problem-based learning groups [J]. Med Educ, 2017, 51(4): 390-400. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13151http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13151.
Abdelkhalek N, Hussein A, Gibbs T, et al. Using team-based learning to prepare medical students for future problem-based learning [J]. Med Teach, 2010, 32(2): 123-129. DOI: 10.3109/01421590903548539http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590903548539.
Parmelee DX, Michaelsen LK. Twelve tips for doing effective Team-Based Learning (TBL) [J]. Med Teach, 2010, 32(2): 118-122. DOI: 10.3109/01421590903548562http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590903548562.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621