基于德尔菲法构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系

李敏; 伊静; 郭中献; 王颖

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021‐20210501‐01428

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于德尔菲法构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系

护理教育研究 | 更新时间：2023-10-12

- 基于德尔菲法构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系
- Construction of selection index system of clinical nursing teachers based on Delphi method
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2023年22卷第9期页码：1398-1402
- 作者机构：
  
  大连医科大学附属第二医院护理部，大连　116023
- 作者简介：
  
  伊静，Email：yijing881023@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  辽宁省教育科学“十三五”规划课题(JG18DB120);大连医科大学教改立项课题(DYLX18021)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021‐20210501‐01428
  中图分类号： R47
- 纸质出版日期：2023-09-20，
  
  收稿日期：2021-05-01，
扫描看全文
李敏, 伊静, 郭中献, 等. 基于德尔菲法构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1398-1402.

Li Min, Yi Jing, Guo Zhongxian, et al. Construction of selection index system of clinical nursing teachers based on Delphi method[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1398-1402.
李敏, 伊静, 郭中献, 等. 基于德尔菲法构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(9): 1398-1402. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021.

Li Min, Yi Jing, Guo Zhongxian, et al. Construction of selection index system of clinical nursing teachers based on Delphi method[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(9):1398-1402. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021‐20210501‐01428.

摘要

目的

构建临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系，为提高临床带教教师综合素质及本科护生临床综合实践能力提供理论依据。

方法

采用文献回顾法、头脑风暴法、半结构访谈法，初步构建临床带教教师遴选指标体系；应用德尔菲法对25名专家进行两轮咨询；应用SPSS 20.0统计软件分析咨询数据，通过计算专家积极系数、权威系数、意见集中程度及协调程度等指标，根据专家意见对指标内容进行修改、完善；最终确立临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系。

结果

两轮咨询专家积极系数均为96%，专家权威系数分别为0.857、0.848，专家协调系数为0.277~0.442（

0.001），确定了4个一级指标、12个二级指标及45个三级指标。

结论

临床护理带教教师遴选指标体系具有较高的科学性和可靠性，可为临床带教教师的筛选提供理论依据。

Abstract

Objective

To construct the selection index system of clinical nursing teachers

and to provide theoretical basis for improving the comprehensive quality of clinical teachers and the comprehensive clinical practice ability of undergraduate nursing students.

Methods

Using the methods of literature review

brainstorming and semi-structured interview

the selection index system of clinical nursing teachers was initially constructed. Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of consultation on 25 experts. SPSS 20.0 was used to analyze the consulting data and calculate the experts' positive coefficient

authority coefficient

degree of concentration of opinions and degree of coordination

and the index contents were modified and improved according to the expert opinions. Finally

the selection index system of clinical nursing teachers was established.

Results

Based on the two rounds of expert consultation

the positive coefficient of experts was 96%

the authoritative coefficient of experts was 0.857 and 0.848 respectively

and the coordination coefficient of experts was 0.277~0.442 (

0.001). Four first level indexes

12 second level indexes and 45 third level indexes were determined.

Conclusion

The selection index system of clinical nursing teachers is scientific and reliable

which can provide a theoretical basis for the selection of clinical nursing teachers.

关键词

德尔菲法临床带教本科护生遴选指标

Keywords

Delphi methodClinical teachingUndergraduate nursing studentsSelection index

references

Ludin SM, Fathullah NM. Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the effectiveness of clinical teaching behaviours in Malaysia: a cross-sectional, correlational survey [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2016, 44: 79-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.007.

Li AT, Lin JW. Constructing core competency indicators for clinical teachers in Taiwan: a qualitative analysis and an analytic hierarchy process [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2014, 14: 75. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-75http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-75.

Hababeh MO, Lalithabai DS. Nurse trainees' perception of effective clinical instructor characteristics [J]. Int J Nurs Sci, 2020, 7(3): 285-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.06.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.06.006.

许蓉. 临床护理教师队伍建设的探索与实践[J]. 中华护理教育， 2011， 8（7）： 316-317. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2011.07.009http://dx.doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2011.07.009.

李莼，周春兰，吴艳妮，等. 临床护理师资管理和培训体系的构建[J]. 护理学报， 2013， 20（12）： 14-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.12.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.12.004.

Iyigun E, Tastan S, Ayhan H, et al. The clinical learning environment, supervision and the nurse teacher evaluation scale: Turkish Version [J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2020, 26(2): e12795. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12795http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12795.

张杰，姚抒予，郭玉芳，等. 护士职业素养评价体系的构建[J]. 护理管理杂志， 2018，18（12）： 837-841. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2018.12.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2018.12.001.

赵婷，李红玉. 健康中国背景下临床护理人员信息能力评估指标体系的构建[J]. 护理研究， 2020， 34（14）： 2452-2456. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.14.004http://dx.doi.org/10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.14.004.

耿丹，张彩虹，郭洪花. 基于专业发展记录的护理实践教学模式的研究现状[J]. 护理研究， 2018， 32（19）： 2989-2992. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.19.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.19.001.

Scarbecz M, Russell CK, Shreve RG, et al. Faculty development to improve teaching at a health sciences center: a needs assessment [J]. J Dent Educ, 2011, 75(2): 145-159.

AlThiga H, Mohidin S, Park YS, et al. Preparing for practice: nursing intern and faculty perceptions on clinical experiences [J]. Med Teach, 2017, 39(sup1): S55-S62. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254739http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254739.

Shen L, Yang J, Jin X, et al. Based on Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process to construct the Evaluation Index system of nursing simulation teaching quality [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019, 79: 67-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.021http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.021.

Jayasuriya-Illesinghe V, Nazeer I, Athauda L, et al. Role Models and Teachers: medical students perception of teaching-learning methods in clinical settings, a qualitative study from Sri Lanka [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2016, 16: 52. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0576-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0576-6.

Onieva-Zafra MD, Fernández-Muñoz JJ, Fernández-Martínez E, et al. Anxiety, perceived stress and coping strategies in nursing students: a cross-sectional, correlational, descriptive study [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020, 20(1): 370. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02294-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02294-z.

刘淑贤. 探讨新护理模式下临床带教师资队伍建设[J]. 护理研究， 2016， 30（20）： 2473-2474. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.20.012http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.20.012.

Duvivier RJ, Van Dalen J, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Teacher perceptions of desired qualities, competencies and strategies for clinical skills teachers [J]. Med Teach, 2009, 31(7): 634-641. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802578228http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590802578228.

Khalajinia Z, Alipour Z, Safaeipour R. Exploring medical teachers' and interns' experiences regarding professional ethics [J]. J Educ Health Promot, 2020, 9: 131. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_706_19http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_706_19.

董建俐，沙丽艳，伊静，等. 巴林特小组培训提升护士情绪智力及沟通能力的作用[J]. 护理学杂志， 2016， 31（21）： 73-75. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.21.073http://dx.doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.21.073.

D'Souza MS, Karkada SN, Parahoo K, et al. Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2015, 35(6): 833-840. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.005.

Esmaeili M, Cheraghi MA, Salsali M, et al. Nursing students' expectations regarding effective clinical education: a qualitative study [J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2014, 20(5): 460-467. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12159http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12159.

Kermansaravi F, Navidian A, Yaghoubinia F. Nursing students' views of nursing education quality: a qualitative study [J]. Glob J Health Sci, 2015, 7(2): 351-359. DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p351http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p351.

金海政，刘冬梅. 通过评聘政策杠杆加强临床教师队伍建设的实践与思考[J]. 医学教育管理， 2019， 5（Z1）： 35-36， 47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2019.S.011http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2019.S.011.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

“卓越医生”导向的教评法在皮肤性病学临床带教中的应用

基于德尔菲法构建临床医学专业本科生教学评估指标的研究

Delphi法构建热带医学本科教育人才培养目标和课程的研究

国家一流专业建设背景下临床医学见习教学同质化管理评价标准的研究

用人单位对住院医师胜任能力的满意度评价指标构建