
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京 100191
2.北京大学医学人文学院学生办公室,北京 100191
3.北京大学研究生院医学部分院学会秘书处办公室,北京 100191
4.北京大学医学学位与研究生教育研究中心,北京 100191
5.石河子大学医学院预防医学系,石河子 832003
6.北京大学医学部卫生政策与技术评估中心,北京 100191
王志锋,Email:zhfwangwf@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-20,
收稿日期:2023-12-21,
移动端阅览
朱泉熔, 王俊人, 贾金忠, 等. 临床医学硕士专业学位研究生导师“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”现状[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1169-1175.
Zhu Quanrong, Wang Junren, Jia Jinzhong, et al. The "burnout-engagement continuum" status of postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical Medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1169-1175.
朱泉熔, 王俊人, 贾金忠, 等. 临床医学硕士专业学位研究生导师“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”现状[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1169-1175. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231221-01837.
Zhu Quanrong, Wang Junren, Jia Jinzhong, et al. The "burnout-engagement continuum" status of postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical Medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1169-1175. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231221-01837.
目的
2
掌握临床医学硕士专业学位研究生(简称“临床专硕”)导师的“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”现状并识别重点人群。
方法
2
2023年10至11月,对临床专硕导师进行匿名网络问卷调查,明确导师“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”现状。通过(均数±标准差)描述不同维度职业倦怠得分,采用频数和构成比描述不同状态导师分布。使用R 4.3.1软件进行卡方检验分析不同类型导师5种状态分布的差异,并采用Bonferroni法进行组间两两比较。
结果
2
共收集到2 664份有效问卷。临床专硕导师情绪衰竭、玩世不恭和个人成就感维度得分依次为(2.46±0.95)、(1.74±0.89)和(4.23±0.90)。临床专硕导师处于“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”中工作投入、低效、过度劳累、淡漠、倦怠状态的占比依次为42.76%(1 139/2 664)、43.54%(1 160/2 664)、33.03%(880/2 664)、14.71%(392/2 664)、13.66%(364/2 664)。人口学特征上,“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”在年龄、性别、婚姻状况、最高学历方面的分布有差异(
P
<
0.05)。工作相关特征上,“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”在相对收入、职称、是否承担行政职务、工作日和节假日工作时长方面的分布有差异(
P
<
0.05)。地区特征上,工作
投入、低效、过度劳累状态在东、西部地区的分布有差异(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
临床专硕导师倦怠状态占比较高,低效状态是常见的消极状态,西部地区、45岁以下、男性、已婚、博士学位、副高级职称、相对收入低、不担任行政职务、工作日工作10 h以上、节假日工作4 h以上者是重点关注人群,可通过提供更多资源、工作福利及强化激励措施等改善导师状态。
Objective
2
To investigate the "burnout-engagement continuum" status of postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical Medicine and to identify key populations.
Methods
2
From October to November 2023
an anonymous online questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the "burnout-engagement continuum" status of postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical Medicine. The scores of different dimensions of job burnout are expressed as mean±standard deviation
and the distribution of supervisors of different status is presented in frequency and percentage. All data analyses were performed in R 4.3.1. Distribution of the five profiles among supervisors of different status was compared using the chi-square test and compared pairwise using the Bonferroni method.
Results
2
A total of 2 664 valid questionnaires were collected. The scores of emotional exhaustion
cynicism and personal accomplishment were(2.46±0.95)
(1.74±0.89)
and(4.23±0.90)
respectively. The prevalence of job engagement
inefficacy
overexertion
disengagement
and burnout among the supervisors were 42.76%(1 139/2 664)
43.54%(1 160/2 664)
33.03%(880/2 664)
14.71%(392/2 664)
and 13.66%(364/2 664)
respectively. In terms of demographics
the distribution of the "burnout-engagement continuum" was significantly different by age
sex
marital status
and highest education level(
P
<
0.05). In terms of work-related characteristics
the distribution of the "burnout-engagement continuum" was significantly different by income
professional title
administrative position
and working hours on weekdays and holidays(
P
<
0.05). The distribution of engagement
inefficacy
and overexertion was significantly different between the eastern and western regions(
P
<
0.05).
Conclusions
2
There is a high percentage of individuals with burnout among postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical Medicine
and inefficacy is a common negative state. Supervisors who work in the western regions
are under 45 years of age
are male
are married
have a doctorate degree
hold associate senior professional title
have lower relative income
are not holding administrative duties
and work more than 10 hours on workdays and more than 4 hours on holidays are key populations that require increased attention. The psychological state of supervisors can be improved by providing them with more resources
work benefits
and incentives.
临床专硕导师职业倦怠工作投入低效过度劳累淡漠
Postgraduate supervisors of the Professional Master's Program in Clinical MedicineJob burnoutEngagementInefficacyOverexertionDisengagement
Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout [J]. Annual rev psychol, 2001, 52(1): 397-422.
黄先政, 张朋. 高校教师职业倦怠问题研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2018, 36(7): 130-133. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2018.07.028http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2018.07.028.
Sabagh Z, Hall NC, Saroyan A. Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout [J]. Educ Res, 2018, 60(2): 131-156. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2018.1461573http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1461573.
Leiter MP, Maslach C. Latent burnout profiles: a new approach to understanding the burnout experience [J]. Burn Res, 2016, 3(4): 89-100. DOI: 10.1016/J.BURN.2016.09.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.BURN.2016.09.001.
余悦, 王瑾, 张巧耘, 等. 我国职业人群“职业倦怠-工作投入连续体”5种状态分布及影响因素[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2023, 40(4): 389-395, 412. DOI: 10.11836/JEOM22429http://dx.doi.org/10.11836/JEOM22429.
李超平, 时勘. 分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(5): 677-684.
Mind Garden. A message from the Maslach Burnout Inventory Authors [EB/OL].(2019-03-19)[2023-10-22]. https://www.mindgarden.com/blog/post/4-a-message-from-the-maslach-burnout-inventory-authorshttps://www.mindgarden.com/blog/post/4-a-message-from-the-maslach-burnout-inventory-authors.
Crowe L, Young Am J, Smith AC, et al. Critical care staff wellbeing: a new paradigm for understanding burnout [J]. Aust Crit Care, 2023, 36(1): 59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.010http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.010.
Boulier S, Baumann C, Rousseau H, et al. Burnout profiles among French workers in health units for inmates: results of the EHCAU study [J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021, 21(1): 595. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06600-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06600-3.
王俊人, 贾金忠, 王志锋, 等. 临床医学研究生导师职业倦怠现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2022(10): 55-62. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2022.10.009http://dx.doi.org/10.16750/j.adge.2022.10.009.
Zheng Q, Yang K, Zhao RJ, et al. Burnout among doctors in China through 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8(7): e09821. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09821http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09821.
马麟, 朱泉熔, 王俊人, 等. 我国不同地区临床医学专业研究生导师职业倦怠现状及影响因素的调查与分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 507-512. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220914-01174http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220914-01174.
张曼婷, 梁伟廷, 王玮, 等. 付出-回报失衡模型: 发展与应用[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(3): 204-215. DOI: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2023.03.002.
刘春雨, 张龑. 妇产科规范化培训医师工作压力现状与影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(1): 51-56. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220520-01576http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220520-01576.
夏福斌, 林忠. 工作特征压力模型: 理论述评及其应用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2013(3): 100-105.
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621