儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向的调查研究

党红星; 罗蓉; 李静

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231030-01629

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向的调查研究

更新时间：2024-02-29

- 儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向的调查研究
- An investigative study of critical thinking disposition in pediatric professional graduate students
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2024年页码：1-7
- 作者机构：
  
  1.重庆医科大学附属儿童医院重症医学科，国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心，重庆　400014
  2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院健康管理中心，重庆　400042
- 作者简介：
  
  李静，lijingwangyi@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  重庆医科大学未来医学青年创新团队发展支持计划项目(2021-W0111)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231030-01629
  中图分类号： R05
- 网络出版日期：2024-02-29，
  
  收稿日期：2023-10-30，
扫描看全文
党红星, 罗蓉, 李静. 儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024,1-7.

Dang Hongxing, Luo Rong, Li Jing. An investigative study of critical thinking disposition in pediatric professional graduate students[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,1-7.
党红星, 罗蓉, 李静. 儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024,1-7. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231030-01629.

Dang Hongxing, Luo Rong, Li Jing. An investigative study of critical thinking disposition in pediatric professional graduate students[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,1-7. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231030-01629.

摘要

目的

研究儿科专业学位研究生的批判性思维倾向，了解其影响因素并提出教学改进建议。

方法

本横断面研究使用加利福尼亚批判性思维倾向量表-中文版（California critical thinking disposition inventory-Chinese version，CTDI-CV），采用“问卷星”网络调查的形式，对2022年9月至2023年8月在重庆医科大学附属儿童医院重症医学科临床轮转的儿科专业学位硕士研究生进行批判性思维倾向调查分析。通过（均数±标准差）描述CTDI-CV得分，采用SPSS 23.0软件用

检验、

检验、趋势性分析和简单线性回归等方法分析批判性思维倾向分布情况。

结果

共收集到130份有效问卷。儿科专业学位硕士研究生CTDI-CV总体平均为（235.76±30.73）分，男性得分为（224.40±28.50），低于女性的（242.86±30.08）（

=0.001）；“5+3”一体化学生（244.18±30.33）较统招硕士（232.02±30.32）得分高（

=0.037）；研究生三年级学生（254.77±18.97）比二年级（229.21±27.19）和一年级（219.79±37.41）得分高，且随年级增加而增加（

=30.34，

0.000 1）。全部学生寻找真相子维度的平均分为（39.52±6.86），是所有子维度中最高的；最低的是批判思维的自信心得分为（28.65±7.23）。女性在寻找真相、开放思想、分析能力、系统化能力、批判思维的自信心、认知成熟度的得分均显著高于男性（

=0.027，0.025，0.031，0.016，0.005，0.013）；求知欲在男女之间差异无统计学意义（

=0.073）。

结论

大多数儿科专业学位研究生在批判性思维倾向上呈现多元化或不太倾向于批判性思维。他们愿意寻找真相，但批判性思维的自信心较低。其中，女性、“5+3”一体化和高年级研究生相对更倾向于批判性思维。这些发现突显了采取更有效的教学方法以促进批判性思维的重要性。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the critical thinking disposition of pediatric professional graduate students and the influencing factors

and to put forward suggestions for teaching improvement.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study

we administered the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV) through an online survey tool (Wenjuanxing) to pediatric professional graduate students rotating in the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2022 to August 2023. CTDI-CV scores were described as mean ± standard deviation. The distribution of critical thinking disposition scores was analyzed using the

test

trend analysis

and simple linear regression analysis with the use of SPSS 23.0.

Results

A total of 130 usable questionnaires were returned. The overall mean CTDI-CV score of the pediatric graduate students was (235.76±30.73). The CTDI-CV score was significantly lower in male students than in female students (224.40±28.50 vs. 242.86±30.08

=0.001). The students of the integrated "5+3" program scored significantly higher than the graduate students recruited through the national unified examination (244.18±30.33 vs. 232.02±30.32

=0.037). The CTDI-CV scores of the first-

second-

and third-year graduate students were 219.79±37.41

229.21±27.19

and 254.77±18.97

respectively

showing a significant upward trend (

=30.34

0.000 1). Among all attributes

the score for truth-seeking in all students was highest (39.52±6.86)

while the score for confidence in reasoning was lowest (28.65±7.23). Female students scored significantly higher than male students in truth-seeking (

=0.027)

open-mindedness (

=0.025)

analyticity (

=0.031)

systematicity (

=0.016)

confidence in reasoning (

=0.005)

and cognitive maturity (

=0.013)

with no significant difference in inquisitiveness (

=0.073).

Conclusion

Most pediatric graduate students exhibit diversified or somewhat little inclination towards critical thinking

with a willingness to seek truth but low confidence in critical thinking. Female students

those in the integrated "5+3" program

and upper-level students are more likely to have critical thinking. These findings underscore the need for more effective teaching methods to foster critical thinking.

关键词

儿科专业学位研究生批判性思维倾向：批判性思维倾向量表医学教育

Keywords

PediatricsProfessional graduate studentCritical thinking dispositionCritical thinking disposition inventoryMedical education

references

Silberman D, Carpenter R, Takemoto JK, et al. The impact of team-based learning on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students [J]. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 2021, 13(2): 116-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.008.

Persky AM, Medina MS, Castleberry AN. Developing critical thinking skills in pharmacy students [J]. Am J Pharm Educ, 2019, 83(2): 7033. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7033http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7033.

Reale MC, Riche DM, Witt BA, et al. Development of critical thinking in health professions education: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies [J]. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 2018, 10(7): 826-833. DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.04.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.04.019.

van Nguyen T, Liu HE. Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: a cross-sectional study [J]. Nurs Open, 2021, 8(4): 1970-1980. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.875http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.875.

Westerdahl F, Carlson E, Wennick A, et al. Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol [J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(1): e033214. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214.

Richards JB, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching clinical reasoning and critical thinking: from cognitive theory to practical application [J]. Chest, 2020, 158(4): 1617-1628. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525.

施一公. 研究生必须具备批判性思维[J]. 中国研究生， 2023（8）： 15-18.

彭美慈，汪国成，陈基乐，等. 批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志， 2004， 39（9）： 7-10.

Kang D, Zhang L, Jin S, et al. Effectiveness of palliative care simulation in newly hired oncology nurses' training [J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2022, 9(3): 167-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.11.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.11.004.

Boso CM, van der Merwe AS, Gross J. Critical thinking disposition of nursing students: a quantitative investigation [J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2021, 55: 103167. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103167http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103167.

Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2002, 39(2): 123-132. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00019-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00019-0.

Scott IA, Hubbard RE, Crock C, et al. Developing critical thinking skills for delivering optimal care [J]. Intern Med J, 2021, 51(4): 488-493. DOI: 10.1111/imj.15272http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15272.

韩仰，冯丹丹，周艳，等. 医学学术型研究生新生批判性思维能力现状调查[J]. 基础医学教育， 2022， 24（4）： 304-308. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2022.04.19http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2022.04.19.

安静，赵增炜. 临床医学规培生批判性思维能力调查研究[J]. 医学教育研究与实践， 2020， 28（4）： 679-681， 733. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.04.031http://dx.doi.org/10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.04.031.

刘冬，叶青剑，张宇，等. 儿童外科规培医生批判性思维的现况调查分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育， 2023（8）： 25-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2023.08.010http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2023.08.010.

Zia A, Dar UF. Critical Thinking: perception and disposition of students in a Medical College of Pakistan [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2019, 69(7): 968-972.

Jimenez JM, Lopez M, Castro MJ, et al. Development of critical thinking skills of undergraduate students throughout the 4 years of nursing degree at a public university in Spain: a descriptive study [J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(10): e049950. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049950http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049950.

Sireerat K, Seki N, Akiyama M, et al. Critical thinking disposition among Thai dental students [J]. J Dent Educ, 2022, 86(8): 968-975. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12913http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12913.

Zhai J, Zhang H. Critical thinking disposition of medical students in Anhui Province, China: a cross-sectional investigation [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1): 652. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04646-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04646-x.

Anderson AS, Good DJ. Self-perceptions of critical thinking skills in university students are associated with BMI and exercise [J]. J Am Coll Health, 2022, 70(5): 1444-1450. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1803879http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1803879.

Li S, Ye X, Chen W. Practice and effectiveness of "nursing case-based learning" course on nursing student's critical thinking ability: a comparative study [J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2019, 36: 91-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.007.

D'Agostino EM, Freudenberg N. Population thinking instruction in high schools: a public health intervention with triple benefits [J]. J Urban Health, 2019, 96(6): 902-911. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-019-00383-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00383-z.

Xing C, Zhou Y, Li M, et al. The effects of CPBL + SBAR teaching mode among the nursing students [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 100: 104828. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104828http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104828.

Kim DH. Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film [J]. Korean J Med Educ, 2019, 31(1): 19-28. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2019.115http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.115.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

新时代我国儿科医学教育面临的机遇与挑战

儿科住院医师规范化培训教学门诊的运行管理

儿科临床研究协调员职业培训现状的调查与需求分析

儿科医护人员医学叙事能力影响因素及与心理弹性的相关性分析

我国儿科医学人文教育的研究热点与趋势