
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.吉林大学第一医院全科医学科,长春 130021
2.吉林大学第一医院血液科,长春 130021
李昱瑛,Email:li_yu_ying_@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-02-20,
收稿日期:2023-05-12,
扫 描 看 全 文
武静, 魏金婴, 白晓雪, 等. 基于“一践行、三学会”指导下构建多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(2): 185-190.
Wu Jing, Wei Jinying, Bai Xiaoxue, et al. Construction of teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine course teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning"[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(2):185-190.
武静, 魏金婴, 白晓雪, 等. 基于“一践行、三学会”指导下构建多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(2): 185-190. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230512-01626.
Wu Jing, Wei Jinying, Bai Xiaoxue, et al. Construction of teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine course teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning"[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(2):185-190. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230512-01626.
目的
2
探讨基于“一践行、三学会”指导下构建多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系。
方法
2
首先成立研究小组查阅相关资料及文献,经过小组成员初步拟定、反复讨论修改,并邀请全科医学专家进一步讨论、修改完善以形成初步的评价指标体系框架,形成“一践行、三学会”指导下的多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系专家咨询问卷。通过两轮专家咨询构建全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系,并以构建的指标体系为依据编制问卷调查表,采用问卷调查的方法验证本研究所构建的评价指标体系的合理性和科学性。
结果
2
构建的“一践行、三学会”指导下的多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价体系包括一级指标3个、二级指标15个、三级指标41个。以构建的评价指标为基础,制定的全科医学课程评价问卷调查表结果显示评价指标体系总体Cronbach’s
α
系数为0.981,一级指标全科医学教学计划、“一践行、三学会”指导下的多元化理论及实践教学、综合能力培养的Cronbach’s
α
系数分别为0.920、0.919、0.923。指标体系总体内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.981,各条目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.826~1.000。一级指标与指标体系总体相关系数为0.837~0.942(均
P
<
0.05),二级指标与相应一级指标相关系数为0.586~0.971(均
P
<
0.05),三级指标与相应一级指标的相关系数为0.412~0.904(均
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
构建的“一践行、三学会”指导下多元化全科医学课程教师教学能力评价指标针对性强、结构合理,具有较好的可行性、可靠性和实用性,可以为全科医学本科医学教育的培养提供理论参考依据。
Objective
2
To construct a teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine course teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning".
Methods
2
A research group was established to search for relevant documents and literature. A framework of evaluation index system was established through drafting and repeated discussion and modification by members of the group
as well as further discuss and modification by experts in general medicine. The framework was used to develop an expert consultation questionnaire on the teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine course teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning". Through two rounds of expert consultation
a teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning" was constructed. A questionnaire was developed according to the system. The rationality and scientificity of the evaluation index system were verified by questionnaire survey.
Results
2
The teaching ability evaluation system for diversified general medicine teachers under the guidance of "one practice and three learning" included 3 first-level indicators
15 second-level indicators
and 41 third-level indicators. The general medicine curriculum evaluation questionnaire developed on the system showed that the Cronbach's
α
coefficient of the overall evaluation system was 0.981. The Cronbach's
α
coefficients of first-level indicators
including general medicine teaching plan
diversified theory and practice teaching
and comprehensive ability cultivation under the guidance of "one practice and three learning" ideology
were 0.920
0.919
and 0.923
respectively. The content validity index (S-CVI) of the system was 0.981
and the content validity index (I-CVI) of indicators were 0.826-1.000. The correlation coefficients of first-level indicators and the system were 0.837-0.942 (all
P
<
0.05). The correlation coefficients of second-level indicators and their corresponding first-level indicators were 0.586-0.971 (all
P
<
0.05). The correlation coefficients of third-level indicators and their corresponding first-level indicators were 0.412-0.904 (all
P
<
0.05).
Conclusions
2
Under the guidance of "one practice and three learning"
the teaching ability evaluation indicators for diversified general medicine course teachers have high specificity
rationale structure
high feasibility
high reliability
and high practicability. This evaluation system can provide theoretical reference for the training of undergraduate students in general medicine.
多元化全科医学评价体系
DiversifiedGeneral medicineEvaluation system
祁祯楠, 董爱梅, 韩晓宁, 等. 本科生阶段全科医学教学模式研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(7): 839-842. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.07.018http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.07.018.
石宗嫱, 王荣英, 张金佳, 等. 不同课程体系下农村订单定向医学本科生的教学满意度及其对全科医学专业的认知情况比较[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2023, 22(7): 704-709. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20220930-00970http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20220930-00970.
中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《普通高等学校师范类专业认证实施办法(暂行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2017-10-26)[2023-05-25]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/201711/t20171106_318535.htmlhttp://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/201711/t20171106_318535.html.
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2001, 38(2): 195-200. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00044-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00044-4.
杨森, 傅智丽, 潘颖, 等. 全科团队长岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建及应用研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(7): 874-881, 887. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.305http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.305.
王健, 赵琦, 祝墡珠, 等. 在校医学本科生对《全科医学概论》课程的评价和全科医学认知状况的调查研究[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2018, 17(11): 901-904. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2018.11.009http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2018.11.009.
刘彦, 陈吉刚, 何坪, 等. 2014—2018年重庆市全科医学师资培训现状调查[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2023, 20(4): 12-16. DOI: 10.11986/j.issn.1673-873X.2023.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.11986/j.issn.1673-873X.2023.04.003.
周虹, Timothy Noel Stephens, 罗玉成, 等. 全科医学临床技能工作坊培训效果评价研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(34):4372-4377. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.246http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.246.
申颖, 左延莉, 孔燕, 等. “三三三制” 课堂教学在《全科医学概论》课程中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(31): 3866-3870. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.356http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.356.
金晶. PDCA联合情景模拟教学强化训练提高县域医共体内护理急救能力培训的应用效果[J]. 中国乡村医药, 2022, 29(8): 69-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5180.2022.08.038http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5180.2022.08.038.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621