
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.济宁医学院附属医院手术室,济宁 272100
2.北京大学第三医院手术室,北京 100191
3.济宁医学院临床医学院,济宁 272100
刘怀燕,Email:350740228@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2023-11-20,
收稿日期:2022-11-15,
扫 描 看 全 文
刘怀燕, 田晶, 贾代良, 等. 谦卑型导师模式在手术室带教中的应用及分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(11): 1720-1726.
Liu Huaiyan, Tian Jing, Jia Dailiang, et al. Application and analysis of the humble tutor mode in operating room teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(11):1720-1726.
刘怀燕, 田晶, 贾代良, 等. 谦卑型导师模式在手术室带教中的应用及分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(11): 1720-1726. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20221115-01500.
Liu Huaiyan, Tian Jing, Jia Dailiang, et al. Application and analysis of the humble tutor mode in operating room teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(11):1720-1726. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20221115-01500.
目的
2
探讨谦卑型导师模式在手术室实习护生带教中的应用效果。
方法
2
选择济宁医学院附属医院总院区手术室 2020年8月至2021年6月40名实习护生作为对照组,2021年8月至2022年9月46 名实习护生作为试验组。对照组接受常规导师模式带教,试验组采用谦卑型导师模式带教。比较两组护生理论知识与操作技能考核成绩,以及建言行为、自我效能感、谦卑型导师感知教学效果。采用SPSS 19.0进行
t
检验、卡方检验和相关分析。
结果
2
出科时,试验组护生理论知识(93.86±3.53)分、操作技能考核成绩(90.90±5.68)分,均高于对照组(
P
<
0.001)。护生建言行为评分试验组(35.22±7.60)分,高于对照组的(30.43±5.96)分(
P=
0.002)。护生自我效能感评分试验组(28.17±5.03)分,高于对照组的(24.38±3.39)分(
P
<
0.001)。护生谦卑型导师感知评分试验组(37.04±4.34)分,高于对照组的(26.33±6.63)分(
P
<
0.001)。护生谦卑型导师感知与建言行为(
r
=0.89,
P
<
0.001)、自我效能感(
r
=0.72,
P
<
0.001)、操作技能成绩(
r
=0.66,
P
<
0.001)、理论知识成绩(
r
=0.39,
P
=0.007)呈正相关。
结论
2
谦卑型导师模式在手术室带教中应用效果显著,提高了护生的理论知识与操作技能考核成绩,促进了谦卑型导师的形成,加强了护生建言行为和自我效能感的教学效果。
Objective
2
To investigate the application effect of the humble tutor mode in the teaching of nursing interns in operating room.
Methods
2
A total of 40 nursing interns in the Operating Room of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from August 2020 to June 2021 were selected as control group
and 46 nursing interns from August 2021 to September 2022 were selected as experimental group. The interns in the control group received teaching with the conventional tutor mode
and those in the experimental group received teaching with the humble tutor mode. The two groups were compared in terms of the scores of theoretical knowledge and operation skills
voice behavior
self-efficacy
and humble tutor perception. SPSS 19.0 was used to perform the
t
-test
the chi-square test
and the correlation analysis.
Results
2
At the time of department rotation
the experimental group had significantly higher scores of theoretical knowledge (93.86±3.53) and operation skills (90.90±5.68) than the control group (
P
<
0.001). Compared with the control group
the experimental group had significantly higher scores of voice behavior [(35.22±7.60) vs. (30.43±5.96)
P
=0.002]
self-efficacy [(28.17±5.03) vs. (24.38±3.39)
P
<
0.001]
and humble tutor perception [(37.04±4.34) vs. (26.33±6.63)
P
<
0.001]. Humble tutor perception was positively correlated with voice behavior (
r
=0.89
P
<
0.001)
self-efficacy (
r
=0.72
P
<
0.001)
operation skills (
r
=0.66
P
<
0.001)
and score of theoretical knowledge (
r
=0.39
P
=0.007).
Conclusion
2
The humble tutor mode has a significant effect in operating room teaching and can improve the assessment scores of theoretical knowledge and operation skills
promote the formation of humble tutors
and strengthen the teaching effect of voice behavior and self-efficacy in nursing interns.
谦卑型导师建言行为自我效能感手术室带教实习护生
Humble tutorVoice behaviorSelf-efficacyOperating room teachingNursing intern
陈美玉. 循证护理带教模式对手术室护生实习初期焦虑恐惧情绪的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2014, 20(11): 116-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2014.11.066http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2014.11.066.
Owens BP, Hekman DR. Modeling how to grow: an inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes [J]. Acad Manag J, 2012, 55(4): 787-818. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0441http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0441.
Owens BP, Johnson MD, Mitchell TR. Expressed humility in organizations: implications for performance, teams, and leadership [J]. Organ Sci, 2013, 24(5): 1517-1538. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0795http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795.
周翔. 谦卑型领导对临床护士建言行为的影响: 工作嵌入及情感承诺的链式中介作用[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2021.
Vera D, Rodriguez‐Lopez A. Strategic virtues: humility as a source of competitive advantage [J]. Organ Dyn, 2004, 33(4): 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/J.ORGDYN.2004.09.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGDYN.2004.09.006.
Chen YH, Zhang L, Chen L. The structure and measurement of humble leadership in Chinese cultural context [J]. J Manag Science, 2017, 30(3): 14-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.03.002.
李胜兰, 王碧英, 高日光. 中国组织情境下谦卑型领导的概念及结构维度: 基于追随者中心视角的质化研究探索[J]. 当代财经, 2016(11): 79-88. DOI: 10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.2016.11.008http://dx.doi.org/10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.2016.11.008.
朱杉, 史文娟. 朋辈导师模式在儿科门诊低年资护士适应转型冲击中的应用[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊), 2022, 29(5): 160-164. DOI: 10.19791/j.cnki.1006-6411.2022.13.050http://dx.doi.org/10.19791/j.cnki.1006-6411.2022.13.050.
Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination [J]. Acad Manag J, 2012, 55(1): 71-92. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0176http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176.
陈洁, 郑一宁. 自我效能感在护士工作场所欺凌与工作满意度的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(3): 58-61. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.03.058http://dx.doi.org/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.03.058.
Nielsen R, Marrone JA, Slay HS. A new look at humility: exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership [J]. J Leadersh Organ Stud, 2010, 17(1): 33-43. DOI: 10.1177/1548051809350892http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350892.
蔡金凤, 彭守华, 何娟. 基于良愿前置理论的个体化带教在肿瘤科实习护生教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2022, 21(4): 496-499. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201020-00835http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201020-00835.
杨阳, 罗丽坤, 李杰, 等. 情景模拟演练结合形成性评价在手术室实习生带教中的作用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1190-1194. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201022-00995http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201022-00995.
Yang K, Zhou L, Wang Z, et al. Humble leadership and innovative behaviour among Chinese nurses: the mediating role of work engagement [J]. J Nurs Manag, 2019, 27(8): 1801-1808. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12879http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12879.
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams [J]. Adm Sci Q, 1999, 44(2): 350-383. DOI: 10.2307/2666999http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666999.
Lin X, Chen ZX, Tse HHM, et al. Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The roles of personal sense of power and power distance [J]. J Bus Ethics, 2019, 158(4): 937-950. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2.
易莉艳, 许青, 蔡婷婷. 护士长谦卑型领导行为与护士建言行为的相关性研究[J]. 上海护理, 2019, 19(1): 49-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2019.01.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2019.01.014.
王薇, 李媛菊, 马路野, 等. 基于集聚度的河南省卫生人力资源公平性评价[J]. 中国医院管理, 2017, 37(8): 48-49, 73.
余兴梅. 肿瘤科护士逆境商、自我效能感与职业倦怠的相关性研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2021.
邬青, 朱倩, 李惠玲, 等. 医学本科生课余时间管理能力、自我效能与学习效果的关系研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2022, 21(12): 1745-1751. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200605-01122http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200605-01122.
Chen H, Liang Q, Feng C, et al. Why and when do employees become more proactive under humble leaders? The roles of psychological need satisfaction and Chinese traditionality [J]. J Organ Change Manag, 2021, 34(5): 1076-1095. DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-12-2020-0366http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2020-0366.
徐紫薇, 董永欣, 刘娇. 公立医院谦卑型领导对护士工作投入的影响[J]. 中国医院管理, 2018, 38(10): 67-68, 71.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621