
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.贵州中医药大学第二临床医学院,贵阳 550025
2.贵州中医药大学第二附属医院内科教研室,贵阳 550003
黄礼明,Email:huanglm1963@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-20,
收稿日期:2022-07-28,
移动端阅览
张雄峰, 黄礼明, 李正胜, 等. 弹幕互动与传统互动教学比较分析的随机对照试验——以中医内科学为例[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1248-1252.
Zhang Xiongfeng, Huang Liming, Li Zhengsheng, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the teaching effect of bullet screen interaction versus traditional interaction in classroom: a case study of internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1248-1252.
张雄峰, 黄礼明, 李正胜, 等. 弹幕互动与传统互动教学比较分析的随机对照试验——以中医内科学为例[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2024, 23(9): 1248-1252. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220728-01578.
Zhang Xiongfeng, Huang Liming, Li Zhengsheng, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the teaching effect of bullet screen interaction versus traditional interaction in classroom: a case study of internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(9):1248-1252. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220728-01578.
目的
2
评价弹幕互动在中医内科学教学中的应用效果。
方法
2
采用随机对照试验对150名学生进行分层随机,分为弹幕互动组与传统互动组,分别采用弹幕互动教学和传统互动教学。以弗兰德斯互动分析系统(Flanders Interaction Analysis System,FIAS)、听课评分、问卷调查、成绩测试评估课堂互动效果与教学成绩。采用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行
t
检验和卡方检验。
结果
2
弹幕互动组教师语言比率[(62.63±2.83)%]低于传统互动组[(71.05±3.19)%],学生语言比率、教师间接与直接影响比率、教师积极影响与消极影响比率[(32.68±2.62)%、(96.63±9.59)%、(122.89±6.43)%]高于传统互动组[(22.79±1.32)%、(69.84±3.48)%、(50.58±2.35)%],教师情感氛围积分、课堂活动质量积分、教师课堂互动活动信息传递积分[(23.82±6.54)、(25.67±5.51)、(25.46±10.30)]高于传统互动组[(21.01±6.51)、(22.56±11.95)、(18.44±6.52)];问卷调查结果显示弹幕互动组学生对课堂兴趣、课堂沉闷情况及课堂知识掌握情况选择好与较好的例数分别为104(69.33%)、110(73.33%)及106(70.67%),高于传统互动组的72(48.00%)、74(49.33%)及84(56.00%),基础知识与病例分析分数分别为(84.30±4.13)与(78.53±7.21),高于传统互动组的(79.26±5.67)与(72.56±4.22)。
结论
2
在中医内科学教学中应用弹幕互动教学有利于提高互动效果,提升教学成绩。
Objective
2
To investigate the application effect of bullet screen interaction in the teaching of internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine.
Methods
2
A randomized controlled trial was conducted
and 150 students were randomly divided into bullet screen interaction group and traditional interaction group and received teaching with bullet screen interaction and traditional interaction
respectively. Flanders Interaction Analysis System (FIAS)
class rating
questionnaire survey
and performance test were used to evaluate the effect of classroom interaction and teaching achievement. SPSS 22.0 was used to perform the
t
-test and the chi-square test.
Results
2
Compared with the traditional interaction group
the bullet screen interaction group had a significantly lower teacher's language ratio [(62.63±2.83)% vs. (71.05±3.19)%] and significantly higher student's language ratio [(32.68±2.62)% vs. (22.79±1.32)%]
teacher's indirect/direct influence ratio [(96.63±9.59)% vs. (69.84±3.48)%]
and teacher's positive/negative influence ratio [(122.89±6.43)% vs. (50.58±2.35)%]. Compared with the traditional interaction group
the bullet screen interaction group had significantly higher scores of teacher's emotional atmosphere (23.82±6.54 vs. 21.01±6.51)
quality of classroom activities (25.67±5.51 vs. 22.56±11.95)
and information transmission of teacher's classroom interactive activities (25.46±10.30 vs. 18.44±6.52). The questionnaire survey showed that compared with the traditional interaction group
the bullet screen interaction group had a significantly higher number of the students who selected excellent and good for student interest in classroom
dullness of classroom
and the mastery of classroom knowledge [104 (69.33%)/110 (73.33%)/106 (70.67%) vs. 72(48.00%)/74 (49.33%)/84(56.00%)]
and the bullet screen interaction group had significantly higher scores of basic knowledge and case analysis than the traditional interaction group (84.30±4.13/78.53±7.21 vs. 79.26±5.67/72.56±4.22).
Conclusions
2
The application of bullet screen interaction teaching in the teaching of internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine can help to improve interactive effect and teaching achievement.
中医内科弹幕师生互动随机对照试验
Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicineBullet screenTeacher-student interactionRandomized controlled trial
石瑛, 杜青平, 李新喜, 等. “以学生为中心”互动课堂成功的关键[J]. 大学教育, 2018, 7(9): 184-186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3437.2018.09.059http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-3437.2018.09.059.
魏玥, 王国华, 任晓燕, 等. 师生互动法教学在中医内科教学中的应用与意义[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2019, 17(7): 36-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2019.07.016http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2019.07.016.
Gan CL, Balakrishnan V. Enhancing classroom interaction via IMMAP: an interactive mobile messaging App [J]. Telematics Inform, 2017, 34(1): 230-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.007.
杨红飞, 王红丽. 弹幕在课堂教学互动中的应用探索[J]. 科技创新导报, 2020, 17(12): 193-195, 197. DOI: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2020.12.193http://dx.doi.org/10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2020.12.193.
江卫华. 协同学习理念指导下的课堂互动设计、分析与评价: 交互技术变迁下的应用创新视角[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2007. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1073725http://dx.doi.org/10.7666/d.y1073725.
谢治深, 崔璨, 王君明, 等. “互联网+”时代下的中医药本科生教学应用现状及策略分析[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2018, 29(9): 2277-2278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2018.09.075http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2018.09.075.
Chen Y, Qi H, Qiu Y, et al. Bullet screen in pre-clinical undergraduate pharmacology education: a survey study [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1): 813. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03906-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03906-6.
Yi S, Yun R, Duan X, et al. Similar or different? A comparison of traditional classroom and smart classroom's teaching behavior in China [J]. J Educ Technol Syst, 2021, 49: 461-486. DOI: 10.1177/0047239521988999http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047239521988999.
艾智森, 赵林勇, 熊维希. 弹幕互动引入临床医学本科教学的可行性分析[J]. 癫痫杂志, 2021, 7(5): 457-461. DOI: 10.7507/2096-0247.20210075http://dx.doi.org/10.7507/2096-0247.20210075.
程潇, 黄正正. “弹幕”辅助课堂教学对中医药管理类专业学生学习倦怠的影响研究: 班级氛围的中介作用[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2019, 30(3): 686-688. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2019.03.062http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2019.03.062.
唐艳. 混合式教学中弹幕在线性代数教学中的应用研究[J]. 大学教育, 2019, 8(1): 99-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3437.2019.01.032http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-3437.2019.01.032.
杨海超. FIAS在开放教育远程实时教学中的应用研究: 基于云教室课堂教学案例[J]. 湖南广播电视大学学报, 2019(1): 15-23. DOI: 10.19785/j.cnki.hnddxb.2019.01.003http://dx.doi.org/10.19785/j.cnki.hnddxb.2019.01.003.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621