
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.陆军军医大学西南医院普通外科,重庆 400038
2.陆军军医大学西南医院消化内科,重庆 400038
彭志红,Email:1824880790@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2023-12-20,
收稿日期:2022-04-01,
扫 描 看 全 文
唐波, 高林丰, 刘洪昌, 等. 创建“专病群”协同负责制结合打卡式学习教学在专硕研究生培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1859-1862.
Tang Bo, Gao Linfeng, Liu Hongchang, et al. Application of subspecialty group collaboration combined with disease checklist-driven learning for professional postgraduate training[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(12):1859-1862.
唐波, 高林丰, 刘洪昌, 等. 创建“专病群”协同负责制结合打卡式学习教学在专硕研究生培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1859-1862. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220401-01513.
Tang Bo, Gao Linfeng, Liu Hongchang, et al. Application of subspecialty group collaboration combined with disease checklist-driven learning for professional postgraduate training[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(12):1859-1862. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220401-01513.
目的
2
探索“专病群”协同负责制结合打卡式学习克服亚专科建设中“专病化”治疗模式对专业学位硕士研究生培养影响的价值。
方法
2
以普通外科、消化内科为研究实践学科,将2019级专硕生60人随机分为对照组和试验组(每组30人),对照组采用传统教学,试验组采用“专病群”协同负责结合病种卡打卡学习模式。对教学效果及教学满意度进行组间比较分析。数据采用SPSS 20.0进行
t
检验和卡方检验。
结果
2
在实际教学过程中,试验组专硕生理论考核成绩和病例分析成绩分别为(87.23±10.51)、(92.37±6.87);高于对照组的(71.51±11.32)、(73.61±6.82),差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);试验组专硕生在理论知识掌握、相关疾病临床诊疗思辨能力的应用、教学组织形式、教学效果上满意度分别为90.00%(27/30)、86.67%(26/30)、96.67%(29/30)、93.33%(28/30),明显高于对照组的40.00%(12/30)、23.33%(7/30)、40.00%(12/30)、46.67%(14/30),差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
“专病群”协同负责制结合打卡式学习教学克服了专硕培养“病种学习单一,知识面窄”的问题,引导学生打破了亚专业建设产生的教学壁垒,形成了“全面学习,多病种学习”的新局面,具有较好的推广应用前景。
Objective
2
To explore the value of subspecialty group collaboration combined with disease checklist-driven learning in overcoming the impact of the specialized disease treatment mode in subspecialty establishment on the cultivation of professional postgraduate students.
Methods
2
In the teaching of general surgery and gastroenterology
sixty professional postgraduate students of grade 2019 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group
with 30 students in each group. The control group received traditional teaching
while the experimental group received the teaching mode of subspecialty group collaboration combined with disease checklist-driven learning. The teaching effectiveness and the degree of satisfaction with teaching were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed using the
t
test and the chi-squared test using SPSS 20.0.
Results
2
In actual teaching
compared with the control group
the experimental group showed significantly higher scores of theoretical assessment (71.51±11.32 vs. 87.23±10.51
P
<
0.05) and case analysis (73.61±6.82 vs. 92.37±6.87
P
<
0.05). The rates of satisfaction with theoretical knowledge learning
application of clinical thinking ability for diseases
teaching organization forms
and teaching effectiveness were 90.00%(27/30)
86.67%(26/30)
96.67%(29/30)
and 93.33%(28/30) in the experimental group
respectively
which were significantly higher than those of the control group [40.00%(12/30)
23.33%(7/30)
40.00%(12/30)
and 46.67%(14/30)
respectively; all
P
<
0.05].
Conclusions
2
The subspecialty group collaboration combined with disease checklist-driven learning mode can overcome the problems of "narrow disease spectrum and narrow knowledge scope" in specialized postgraduate education
and guide students to break the teaching barriers generated by subspecialty construction to create a new form of comprehensive and multi-disease learning
with good prospects for promotion and application.
研究生教育专业学位临床技能亚专业
Graduate educationProfessional degreeClinical skillSubspecialty
刘懿萱, 徐明, 段丽萍. 医学研究生教育质量分类评价指标体系构建初探[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2020, 41(3): 20-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2020.03.010http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2020.03.010.
郑雨蒙, 李欣, 周文轲, 等. 临床医学专业学位研究生培养模式的探索[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2020, 12(7): 63-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.07.025http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.07.025.
梁传杰. 专业学位研究生教育质量保障模式: 现实状态与未来走向[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2020, 57(3): 23-28. DOI: 10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2020.03.05http://dx.doi.org/10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2020.03.05.
张伟, 潘沛, 王欣倍, 等. 临床医学专业学位硕士研究生导师考核指标的制订与初步应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2019, 18(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.01.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.01.001.
王凤清, 王青, 段丽萍. 高层次医学应用型人才培养实践[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018, 17(3): 225-228. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2018.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2018.03.002.
畅朋康, 古亚楠, 孙文娟, 等. 专科亚专业发展对传统临床实习的影响及应对策略[J]. 西北医学教育, 2016, 24(1): 160-162. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2016.01.051http://dx.doi.org/10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2016.01.051.
杨莜凤, 杨婷, 赵娟, 等. 阶段性考核在妇产科专业学位研究生专业技能培训中的作用[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2016, 30(4): 469-472. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.201604029http://dx.doi.org/10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.201604029.
樊俊杰, 刘琼, 贺大林, 等. 专科亚专业发展背景下多学科诊疗模式在临床实习教学中的应用及意义[J]. 医学教育研究与实践, 2020, 28(4): 725-728. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.04.043http://dx.doi.org/10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.04.043.
梁思敏, 李茂, 朱瑞, 等. 泌尿外科专业学位硕士研究生培养策略思考[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2019, 18(4): 390-394. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.04.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.04.014.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621