
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院全科医学教研室,哈尔滨 150086
王永晨,Email:yongchenwang@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-10-20,
收稿日期:2021-12-10,
扫 描 看 全 文
郭凌波, 常广明, 王永晨. 全科医学基层实践基地师资综合评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1483-1488.
Guo Lingbo, Chang Guangming, Wang Yongchen. Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(10):1483-1488.
郭凌波, 常广明, 王永晨. 全科医学基层实践基地师资综合评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1483-1488. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211210-01445.
Guo Lingbo, Chang Guangming, Wang Yongchen. Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(10):1483-1488. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211210-01445.
目的
2
构建一套科学、系统的全科医学基层实践基地师资综合评价指标体系,为全科基层实践基地的师资遴选、评价和考核提供参考。
方法
2
在文献研究、专家咨询和小组讨论的基础上,初步构建全科基层实践基地师资原始指标体系。选择具有中级及以上职称,并长期从事医学教育管理、全科医疗与教学、基层医疗卫生服务与管理工作的32名专家,进行两轮德尔菲专家函询,并对函询结果进行统计分析,确定全科基层实践师资综合评价指标。运用层次分析法计算各指标权重并进行一致性检验。运用Yaahp统计学软件进行数据录入和处理。
结果
2
构建出包含3个一级指标、12个二级指标和61个三级指标的全科医学基层实践基地师资综合评价指标体系。3个一级指标分别为师资遴选纳入标准、教学能力评价标准、师资考核标准;权重系数分别为0.334、0.525、0.142。
结论
2
本研究构建的指标体系具有较好的科学性和系统性,为进一步加强全科基层实践基地师资队伍的建设和管理、提升全科住院医师培养质量,提供了理论依据。
Objective
2
To construct a scientific and systematic comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases
and to provide references for their selection
evaluation
and examination.
Methods
2
On the basis of literature research
expert consultation
and group discussion
the original index system of general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases was preliminarily constructed. A total of 32 experts with intermediate or above professional titles and who had long been engaged in medical education management
general practice and teaching
and grassroot medical services and management were selected for two rounds of Delphi expert letter consultations. Through the statistical analysis of the consultation results
the comprehensive evaluation indicators of general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases were determined. Analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each indicator and consistency test was performed. Data were imported and processed using the Yaahp software.
Results
2
A comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases was constructed
including 3 first-level indicators
12 second-level indicators
and 61 third-level indicators. The three first-class indicators were the criterion of teacher selection and inclusion
the criterion of teaching ability evaluation
and the criterion of teacher examination
with weights of 0.334
0.525
and 0.142
respectively.
Conclusion
2
The index system constructed in this study is scientific and systematic
which provides a theoretical basis for further strengthening the construction and management of the general practice teachers at grassroot practice bases and improving the quality of training resident general practitioners.
全科医学基层实践基地师资遴选指标体系
General practiceGrassroot practice baseTeacher selectionIndex system
张鹏思, 吴琼, 张明慧, 等. 全科住院医师规培现状及模式的探索研究[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2020, 12(17): 74-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.17.028http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.17.028.
赵轶明, 王永晨. 全科医学师资标准构建的现状与展望[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(31): 3855-3857. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.31.016http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.31.016.
全科医师规范化培训师资标准建议专家组. 关于建立全科医师规范化培训师资标准的建议[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2016, 15(11): 835-838. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2016.11.005http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2016.11.005.
赵轶明, 王永晨. 全科医学临床师资综合指标体系的初步构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020, 19(9): 1102-1107. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191208-00254http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191208-00254.
Salmon G, Tombs M. Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2018, 18(1): 315. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4.
Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G, Güleryüz S. Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology [J]. Expert Syst Appl, 2011, 38(8): 9407-9424. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.103http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.103.
夏慧玲, 江孙芳, 寿涓, 等. 上海市全科医生规范化培训社区教学基地评估指标权重的研究[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2017, 16(11): 846-850. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.11.007http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.11.007.
曾光. 现代流行病学方法与应用[M]. 北京: 北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社, 1994.
刘彦玲, 谢苗荣, 陈建军. 国内外全科医学师资建设研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(4): 388-393. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.04.003.
Ramanayake RP, de Silva AH, Perera DP, et al. Training medical students in general practice: a qualitative study among general practitioner trainers in Sri Lanka [J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2015, 4(2): 168-173. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.154623http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.154623.
杨辉, 韩建军, 许岩丽. 中国全科医生队伍建设的发展、挑战与展望[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(19): 2267-2279. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.351http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.351.
姚宝洪, 姜若菲, 张刚, 等. 医学院校附属医院兼职教师量化考评可行性的探讨[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2020, 12(1): 64-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.01.028http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.01.028.
战京燕, 娄景秋, 王少坤, 等. 我国全科住院医师规范化培训教学模式及应用效果研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(19): 2401-2407. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.201http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.201.
季燕, 严春泽, 孙艳格, 等. 全科医生继续医学教育开展形式及应用[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(1): 88-91. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.715http://dx.doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.715.
王荣英, 贺振银, 赵稳稳, 等. 全科医学师资培训研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(25): 3144-3148. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.25.017http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.25.017.
赵欣欣, 李觉, 吴恒璟. 社区全科医生科研培养路径的实践与思考[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(12): 1979-1981. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001107http://dx.doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001107.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621