
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.徐州医科大学第二附属医院院感管理科,徐州 221006
2.南京医科大学第一附属医院感染管理处,南京 210029
李占结,Email:1936290801@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2023-11-20,
收稿日期:2021-11-17,
扫 描 看 全 文
张煜, 孙佐君, 李占结. 基于ASK模型的四步培训法联合工作坊在医学生院感防控培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(11): 1676-1679.
Zhang Yu, Sun Zuojun, Li Zhanjie. Application of a ASK model-based four-step training method combined with workshops in training on the prevention and control of nosocomial infection for medical students[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(11):1676-1679.
张煜, 孙佐君, 李占结. 基于ASK模型的四步培训法联合工作坊在医学生院感防控培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(11): 1676-1679. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211117-01489.
Zhang Yu, Sun Zuojun, Li Zhanjie. Application of a ASK model-based four-step training method combined with workshops in training on the prevention and control of nosocomial infection for medical students[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(11):1676-1679. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211117-01489.
目的
2
探讨基于ASK模型[包括态度(attitude,A)、技能(skill,S)、知识(knowledge,K)]的四步培训法联合工作坊在实习生院感防控培训的应用效果,为医学生的院感防控培训模式改革及建立院感防控培训体系提供参考依据。
方法
2
选取2018至2020年进院实习的5所医学院校的医学生,分为对照组(2018至2019年208名医学生,进行院感防控常规培训)和试验组(2019至2020年216名医学生,实施基于ASK模型的四步培训法联合工作坊的院感防控培训),比较两组医学生手卫生依从率、院感防控理论及技能考核达标率、医疗废物处置正确率、职业暴露发生情况、教学满意度。运用SPSS 19.0统计软件进行卡方检验和
t
检验。
结果
2
试验组学生各项指标均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均
P
<
0.05)。试验组手卫生依从率(
χ
2
=4.92,
P
=0.027)、医疗废物处置正确率(
χ
2
=5.13,
P
=0.023)、院感防控理论达标率(
χ
2
=4.03,
P
=0.038)及技能达标率(
χ
2
=6.71,
P
=0.010)、教学满意度均高于对照组[(98.03±2.16)分 vs. (92.53±2.01)分]。试验组学生未发生职业暴露,对照组发生3例职业暴露。
结论
2
基于ASK模型的四步培训法联合工作坊对实习生院感防控培训模式有效,作为一种创新培训方法,提升了临床带教的满意度,为建立院感防控培训体系提供了依据。
Objective
2
To explore the effects of applying a four-step training method based on an attitude-skill-knowledge (ASK) model combined with workshops in training on the prevention and control of nosocomial infection among medical students
and to provide a reference for reforming nosocomial infection prevention and control training for medical students and establishing a nosocomial infection prevention and control training system.
Methods
2
Medical students from five medical schools entering clerkships during 2018 to 2020 were selected. They were divided into control group (218 medical students in 2018-2019 receiving conventional nosocomial infection control training) and experimental group (216 medical students in 2019-2020 receiving nosocomial infection control training based on the ASK model-based four-step method combined with workshops). The two groups were compared in terms of the compliance rate of hand hygiene
the pass rates of nosocomial infection control theory and skill examinations
the correct rate of medical waste disposal
the incidence of occupational exposure
and the degree of satisfaction with teaching.
Results
2
All the indices of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group: the compliance rate of hand hygiene (
χ
2
=4.92
P
=0.027)
the correct rate of medical waste disposal (
χ
2
=5.13
P
=0.023)
the pass rate of nosocomial infection control theory examination (
χ
2
=4.03
P
=0.038)
the pass rate of nosocomial infection control skill examination (
χ
2
=6.71
P
=0.010)
and the degree of satisfaction with teaching [(98.03±2.16) vs. (92.53±2.01)
P
<
0.001]. No one had occupational exposure in the experimental group
while there were three cases in the control group.
Conclusion
2
The ASK model-based four-step method combined with workshops is effective in nosocomial infection prevention and control training for medical students. This innovative training method improves students' satisfaction with clinical teaching
providing a basis for the establishment of a training system for the prevention and control of nosocomial infection.
感控培训ASK模型四步法工作坊
Infection control trainingAttitude-skill-knowledge modelFour-step methodWorkshop
隋友乐, 蹇蔚红, 梁贯洲, 等. 医学生医院感染知识需求调查[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2016, 15(1): 49-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2016.01.012http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2016.01.012.
李静, 胡爱香, 张越巍, 等. 医学生医院感染防控知识培训效果评价[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2018, 28(19): 3016-3018. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2018-182524http://dx.doi.org/10.11816/cn.ni.2018-182524.
李六亿, 刘玉村. 医院感染管理学[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2010: 291.
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.医院感染管理专业人员培训指南:WS/T525-2016[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2017, 16(1): 94-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2017.01.023http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2017.01.023.
周璟, 尹洁洁, 肖丹. 基于思维导图的培训对感染科医护人员职业暴露防护知信行水平的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2021,18(24): 3761-3765. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.24.033http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.24.033.
丁娟, 张凤勤, 陈红宇, 等. 基于ASK模型的培训体系在新护士规范化培训中的应用效果[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2018, 24(17): 2105-2108. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.17.029http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.17.029.
王燕, 吴利平, 易敏, 等. 工作坊在护理本科实习生儿科静脉留置针培训中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020, 19(4): 476-481. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20190606-00109http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20190606-00109.
黄靓, 邓宏军, 何振华, 等. 从临床医院感染学案例式教学看医学高等教育中该课程设置的必要性[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2018, 17(2): 151-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2018.02.013http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2018.02.013.
吴安华. 医院感染控制当前面临的严峻挑战及对策[J]. 华西医学, 2019, 34(3): 227-232.
Schneider A, Coope C, Michie S, et al. Implementing a toolkit for the prevention, management and control of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in English acute hospitals trusts: a qualitative evaluation [J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2019, 19(1): 689. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4492-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4492-4.
van Huizen P, Kuhn L, Russo PL, et al. The nurses' role in antimicrobial stewardship: a scoping review [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2021, 113: 103772. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103772http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103772.
叶青, 徐亚青, 雷幼蓉, 等. 中国医院感染培训研究热点与前沿的可视化分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2019, 18(9): 848-853. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20195357http://dx.doi.org/10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20195357.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621