
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.苏州大学附属儿童医院血液科,苏州 215003
2.苏州市吴江区儿童医院儿内科,苏州 215200
郭宏卿,Email:782016130@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2023-07-20,
收稿日期:2021-03-01,
扫 描 看 全 文
孔令军, 褚培培, 黄洁, 等. 以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学在儿童血液科沟通能力培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(7): 1047-1050.
Kong Lingjun, Chu Peipei, Huang Jie, et al. Application of scenario simulation teaching based on PBL in communication ability training of Pediatric Hematology Department[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(7):1047-1050.
孔令军, 褚培培, 黄洁, 等. 以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学在儿童血液科沟通能力培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(7): 1047-1050. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210301-01352.
Kong Lingjun, Chu Peipei, Huang Jie, et al. Application of scenario simulation teaching based on PBL in communication ability training of Pediatric Hematology Department[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(7):1047-1050. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210301-01352.
目的
2
探讨以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学在儿童血液科沟通能力培训中的应用。
方法
2
对在苏州大学附属儿童医院血液科进行住院医师规范化培训的学员进行医患沟通能力的培训。所有学员采用抽签的方式随机分为对照组24人及观察组24人。对照组采用传统的讲述式教学;观察组采用PBL联合情景模拟教学。应用利物浦医师沟通能力评价量表(Liverpool communication skills assessment scale,LCSAS)中文修订版评估比较两组自身在培训前及培训后的差异,以及两组在培训后的差异;并调查学员对这两种教学方法的认可程度;最后通过出科考试成绩评估医师对儿童血液科知识的掌握程度。通过SPSS 20.0软件进行卡方检验和
t
检验。
结果
2
培训前两组的LCSAS评分分别为(11.61±2.21)、(11.95±2.22),差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05);观察组采用以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学培训后,观察组的LCSAS评分为(27.41±2.53)、对照组为(23.30±1.81),两组差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。问卷调查结果显示,以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学的好评率为91.67%(22/24),较传统讲述式教学高[62.50%(15/24)],差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。出科考试显示,学员经过以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学培训后,对知识的掌握程度更好,分数更高,优秀率为91.67%(22/24),较对照组高[66.67%(16/24)],差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
采用以PBL为基础的情景模拟教学更能提高儿童血液科住院医师规范化培训学员的沟通能力,提高其对于专业知识的掌握程度,学员对此教学方法的满意度较高。
Objective
2
To explore the application of scenario simulation teaching based on PBL in communication skills training of hematology students in Children's Hospital.
Methods
2
The training of doctor-patient communication skills was conducted among trainees who had the standardized residency training at the Department of Hematology of the Children's Hospital of Soochow University. All the residents were randomized into the control group and observation group by lottery
with 24 residents in each group. The control group adopted the traditional narrative teaching method
and the observation group adopted PBL combined with scenario simulation teaching method. The Liverpool communication skills assessment scale (LCSAS) was used to compare the differences between the two groups before and after training
and the differences between the two groups after training. Then the degree of residents' recognition of these two teaching methods was investigated. Finally
the examination results were used to evaluate knowledge mastery of doctors in department of hematology. SPSS 20.0 was used for Chi-square test and
t
-test.
Results
2
LCSAS scores of the two groups before training were respectively (11.61±2.21) and (11.95±2.22)
with no statistically significant difference (
P
>
0.05). After PBL-based scenario simulation teaching and training in the observation group
the LCSAS score of the observation group (27.41±2.53) was higher than that of the control group (23.30±1.81)
and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). Questionnaire survey results showed that the favorable rating rate of PBL-based scenario simulation teaching was 91.67% (22/24)
higher than that of the traditional narrative teaching method [62.50% (15/24)]
and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). The examination of students' mastery of professional knowledge showed that after the PBL-based scenario simulation teaching and training
the trainees had a better grasp of knowledge and a higher score
with excellence rate of 91.67% (22/24)
which was higher than 66.67% (16/24) of the control group
with a statistically significant difference (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The scenario simulation teaching based on PBL could improve the communication ability and professional knowledge of trainees taking standardized residency training in the department of hematology
and the trainees are highly satisfied with this teaching method.
PBL情景模拟血液科沟通能力
Problem-based learningScenario simulationDepartment of HematologyCommunication ability
Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why [J]. Med Educ, 2011, 45(8): 792-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
沈安娜, 王锦鸿. PBL结合统筹法在心内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2020, 24(7): 1227-1230.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2020.07.055http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2020.07.055.
刘华. PBL联合CBS教学法在血液净化科教学中的应用及体会[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2018, 10(6): 11-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.06.006http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.06.006.
董菲, 张朕豪, 高爽, 等. 血液科住院医师缓和医疗临床教学培养[J]. 中国病案, 2020, 21(7): 71-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2020.07.026http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2020.07.026.
潘彬. 病案导学式教学法在血液科教学中的效果分析[J]. 科技视界, 2018(28): 175-176. DOI: 10.19694/j.cnki.issn2095-2457.2018.28.080http://dx.doi.org/10.19694/j.cnki.issn2095-2457.2018.28.080.
郝建萍, 秦玉婷, 哈力达·亚森, 等. 血液科教学中医学员医患沟通能力培养探析[J]. 继续医学教育, 2016, 30(2): 64-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2016.02.042http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2016.02.042.
刘晓, 秦兰. 病案导学式教学法在血液科教学中的效果分析[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2014, 6(4): 97-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2014.04.063http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2014.04.063.
靳嘉铭. 当前我国医患沟通的伦理困境研究[D]. 锦州: 锦州医科大学, 2019.
时志民, 李海涛, 郭兰凯, 等. 临床教学中医学生的医患关系意识的培养[J]. 河北工程大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 37(2): 105-109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9477.2020.02.021http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9477.2020.02.021.
吴瑜, 陈东亮. 浅谈儿科住院医师规范化培训中医患沟通能力的培养[J]. 名医, 2020(11): 391-392.
Paternotte E, Scheele F, Seeleman CM, et al. Intercultural doctor-patient communication in daily outpatient care: relevant communication skills [J]. Perspect Med Educ, 2016, 5(5): 268-275. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-016-0288-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0288-y.
宁德煌, 魏珊珊. 近10年来国内医患沟通研究综述[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 15(6): 6-11. DOI: 10.16112/j.cnki.53-1160/c.2015.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.16112/j.cnki.53-1160/c.2015.06.002.
黄惠君, 黄瑛, 杨军, 等. 儿科规范化培训医师医患沟通能力培养初探[J]. 继续医学教育, 2018, 32(3): 77-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2018.03.037http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2018.03.037.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621