奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示

彭洪; 潘雪

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示

比较医学教育 | 更新时间：2023-05-12

- 奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示
- Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2023年22卷第4期页码：489-493
- 作者机构：
  
  1.南充市中心医院/川北医学院第二临床医学院肛肠科，南充　637000
  2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院科技处，重庆　400016
- 作者简介：
  
  潘雪，Email：19563582@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  教育部产学合作协同育人项目(202101395068;202102647021;202102654069);西南医科大学教改项目(ZYTS-151)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231
  中图分类号： R33
- 纸质出版日期：2023-04-20，
  
  收稿日期：2021-01-22，
扫描看全文
彭洪, 潘雪. 奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 489-493.

Peng Hong, Pan Xue. Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(4):489-493.
彭洪, 潘雪. 奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 489-493. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231.

Peng Hong, Pan Xue. Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(4):489-493. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231.

摘要

医学生需要具备不同层次的能力，所以需要不同的考试形式来衡量能力的高低。不同考试方法的选择对于反映所选课程的学习效果至关重要。本文主要介绍了维也纳医科大学的考试设计及其作用，以及对我国医学教育评估的启示。通过学习奥地利先进的教学评估理念和方法，可为我国医学教育评估方式改革、培养高素质医学人才提供借鉴。

Abstract

Medical students need to have different levels of ability

so various examination forms are required to measure on levels of competency. The choice of different examination methods is very important to reflect the learning effect of the selected courses. The present work describes the examination design and its functions of the Medical University of Vienna

and the enlightenment to the evaluation of higher medical education of China. Learning from the advanced teaching evaluation concepts and methods in Austria may help to promote the reform of medical education evaluation methods and cultivate high-quality medical talents in our country.

关键词

医学考试形式医学教育奥地利

Keywords

Medical examination formMedical educationAustria

references

Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(4): 387-396. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra054784http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784.

Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference [J]. Med Teach, 2011, 33(3): 206-214. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.

Jünger J. Competence-based assessment in the national licensing examination in Germany [J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 2018, 61(2): 171-177. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2668-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2668-9.

Fischer MR, Holzer M, Jünger J. Exams at medical faculties- quality, responsibility and perspectives [J]. GMS Z Med Ausbild, 2010, 27(5): Doc66. DOI: 10.3205/zma000703http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000703.

Kazubke E, Schüttpelz-Brauns K. Review of multiple-choice-questions and group performance—a comparison of face-to-face and virtual groups with and without facilitation [J]. GMS Z Med Ausbild, 2010, 27(5): Doc68. DOI: 10.3205/zma000705http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000705.

Daniels VJ, Pugh D. Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what You want [J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(12): 1208-1213. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1390214http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1390214.

Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J, et al. Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluationof practical skills at different medical faculties [J]. Anat Anzeiger Off Organ Anat Gesellschaft, 2017, 212: 55-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006.

Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J, et al. Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam—a study at five medical schools [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2017, 17(1): 71. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0908-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0908-1.

Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: a qualitative synthesis [J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(4): 414-420. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901.

Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M, Shirazi M, et al. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a systematic review [J]. Syst Rev, 2017, 6(1): 146. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0539-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0539-y.

Barrett A, Galvin R, Steinert Y, et al. A BEME (Best Evidence in Medical Education) review of the use of workplace-based assessment in identifying and remediating underperformance among postgraduate medical trainees: BEME Guide No. 43 [J]. Med Teach, 2016, 38(12): 1188-1198. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215413http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215413.

Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, et al. Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education [J]. Perspect Med Educ, 2017, 6(5): 286-305. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7.

Levine RB, Cayea D. Defining and assessing the 21st-century physician in training [J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2015, 30(9): 1241-1242. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3427-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3427-y.

Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moeltner A, et al. Does medical students' preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance? [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2011, 11: 89. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-89http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-89.

Raupach T, Brown J, Anders S, et al. Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats [J]. BMC Med, 2013, 11: 61. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-61http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-61.

Bennett CR, Mawhood N, Platt MJ. The impact of medical school assessment on preparedness for practice [J]. Med Teach, 2019, 41(1): 112-114. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1425796http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1425796.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同类别研究生对《临床流行病学》的认知、学习习惯及学习效果的调查研究

新时代我国儿科医学教育面临的机遇与挑战

卫生系统科学——医学教育“第三支柱”：全球标准与国际进展

超声专业住院医师规范化培训中“精品课程”建设的实践与思考

置信职业行为在以胜任力为导向的院校医学教育中的应用与研究进展