Objective

2

To explore the methods of improving the clinical thinking ability of clinical medical interns in neurology department.

Methods

2

Clinical medical interns from 2017 to 2018 were selected as the research subjects. The clinical medical interns in 2018 and in 2017 were set as the experimental group (98 people) and the control group (95 people). In the clinical practice of the neurology department

the experimental group was trained in clinical thinking ability

and the control group was trained by the traditional methods. Before the end of the internship

the self-made Clinical Medical Interns Clinical Thinking Ability Questionnaire was used to evaluate the teaching effect. SPSS 14.0 was used for

t

-test and Chi-square test.

Results

2

The experimental group and the control group had the problems of one-sidedness

appearance

fixedness

passivity

laziness

simplification

confusion of clinical thinking. The clinical thinking problems in the experimental group were significantly improved than those in the control group (

P

<

0.001). There were significant differences in clinical thinking between the experimental group and the control group in terms of one-sidedness

appearance

fixedness

passivity and laziness (

P

<

0.05). In addition to language communication and expression ability

the self-assessment score of clinical thinking ability in the experimental group was statistically different from that in the control group (

P

<

0.05). Compared with the control group

there were also significant differences in the examination results of the experimental group (

P

<

0.05).

Conclusion

2

The implementation of clinical thinking training in neurology practice is conducive to cultivating students' clinical thinking ability and improving the quality of personnel training.