美国匹兹堡大学医学中心机器人手术培训课程经验介绍与启示

唐浩; 陈勇

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200914-01232

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

美国匹兹堡大学医学中心机器人手术培训课程经验介绍与启示

比较医学教育 | 更新时间：2023-05-12

- 美国匹兹堡大学医学中心机器人手术培训课程经验介绍与启示
- The experience and enlightenment of robotic surgery training course in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2023年22卷第4期页码：494-499
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆医科大学附属第一医院肝胆外科，重庆　400042
- 作者简介：
  
  陈勇，Email：chenyong61@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目(yjg173078);重庆市中青年医学高端人才培养项目
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200914-01232
  中图分类号： R33
- 纸质出版日期：2023-04-20，
  
  收稿日期：2020-09-14，
扫描看全文
唐浩, 陈勇. 美国匹兹堡大学医学中心机器人手术培训课程经验介绍与启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 494-499.

Tang Hao, Chen Yong. The experience and enlightenment of robotic surgery training course in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(4):494-499.
唐浩, 陈勇. 美国匹兹堡大学医学中心机器人手术培训课程经验介绍与启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 494-499. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200914-01232.

Tang Hao, Chen Yong. The experience and enlightenment of robotic surgery training course in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2023,22(4):494-499. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200914-01232.

摘要

目的

介绍美国匹兹堡大学开展的机器人手术培训课程经验。

方法

详细介绍培训课程的具体流程，同时对培训结果进行总结分析。共有15位学员完成了第一阶段培训（操作台模拟训练），14位（93.3％）完成了第二阶段（胰十二指肠切除组织吻合模拟训练），累计完成196例组织吻合模拟训练。采用STATA和SPSS软件进行统计分析，对得分进行Wilcoxon秩和检验。

结果

吻合模拟训练的表面效度Likert量表平均分分别为：胰空肠吻合（Pancreaticojejunostomy，PJ）（15/20），胃空肠吻合（Gastrojejunostomy，GJ）（15/20）和胆空肠吻合（Hepatocholangiojejunostomy，HJ）（17/20）。在PJ和GJ模拟训练中，与金标准相比，失误率和OSATS得分均改善（

0.05），操作用时无减少（

0.05）；在HJ模拟培训中，失误率、OSATS得分和操作用时均未见改善（

0.05）。但将学员重复进行的吻合训练结果作为一个整体进行线性回归和二次拟合模型分析显示，学员培训后的所有模拟操作均较首次表现得更好。

结论

美国匹兹堡大学医学中心开展的培训课程是行之有效的，对探索出一条符合我国国情的机器人外科发展之路具有借鉴意义。

Abstract

Objective

To introduce the experience of robotic surgery training course in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Methods

The specific process of the training course was introduced in detail

and the results of the training course were summarized and analyzed. A total of 15 surgeons completed the first step of the training (operation table simulation training)

14 (93.3%) completed the second step (pancreatoduodenectomy tissue anastomosis simulation training)

and 196 cases of tissue anastomosis simulation training were completed. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA and SPSS software. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze the data.

Results

The average scores of the surface validity Likert scale for anastomosis simulation training were: (15/20) for Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ)

(15/20) for Gastrojejunostomy (GJ)

and (17/20) for Hepatocholangiojejunostomy (HJ). In the PJ and GJ simulation training

compared with the gold standard

the error rate and OSATS score were significantly improved (

0.05)

and the operation time was not significantly reduced (

0.05). In HJ simulation training

the error rate

OSATS score and operation time did not show significant improvement (

0.05). However

it could be concluded that all the simulation operations performed by the trainees after the training were better than the first time

when linear regression and quadratic fitting models were performed to analyze continuous trainings of the trainees as a group.

Conclusion

The training course carried out by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is valid and effective

and it can be used for reference to explore a way for the development of robotic surgery fitting to the real conditions of our country.

关键词

外科教育机器人手术胰十二指肠切除经验介绍

Keywords

Surgical educationRobotic surgeryPancreaticoduodenectomyExperience introduction

references

Fecso AB, Szasz P, Kerezov G, et al. The effect of technical performance on patient outcomes in surgery : a systematic review[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(3): 492-501. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001959http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001959.

Hogg ME, Zenati M, Novak S, et al. Grading of surgeon technical performance predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula for pancreaticoduodenectomy independent of patient-related variables [J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(3): 482-491. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001862http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001862.

Helling TS, Khandelwal A. The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008, 12(1): 153-158. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0378-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0378-6.

Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy biotissue curriculum has validity and improves technical performance for surgical oncology fellows [J]. J Surg Educ, 2017, 74(6): 1057-1065. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.016.

Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, et al. Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency [J]. J Surg Educ, 2017, 74(3): 477-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.015.

Broholm M , Rosenberg J . Surgical residents are excluded from robot-assisted surgery [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(5): 449-450. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000190http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000190.

Vitish-Sharma P, Knowles J, Patel B. Acquisition of fundamental laparoscopic skills: is a box really as good as a virtual reality trainer? [J]. Int J Surg, 2011, 9(8): 659-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.009http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.009.

Sheckter CC, Kane JT, Minneti M, et al. Incorporation of fresh tissue surgical simulation into plastic surgery education: maximizing extraclinical surgical experience [J]. J Surg Educ, 2013, 70(4): 466-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.02.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.02.008.

Carey JN, Rommer E, Sheckter C, et al. Simulation of plastic surgery and microvascular procedures using perfused fresh human cadavers [J]. J Plast, Reconst Aesthet Surg, 2014, 67(2): e42-e48. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.09.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.09.026.

刘意抒，蔡丽萍，李建萍，等. 达芬奇手术机器人培训开展情况分析[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志， 2018， 25（7）： 652-654. DOI: 10.16770/J.cnki.1008-9985.2018.07.016http://dx.doi.org/10.16770/J.cnki.1008-9985.2018.07.016.

杨琨，张林，王行环，等. 浅论基于机器人手术辅助培训系统的“初、中、高”级培训体系[J]. 中华医学杂志， 2016， 96（18）： 1396-1398. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.18.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.18.002.

周宁新，刘全达，陈军周，等. 机器人外科时代的医师培训与教育[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志， 2011， 18（7）： 677-681.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据