Objective

2

To explore the intervention effect of humanistic management on anxiety and depression tendency of visiting physicians.

Methods

2

The visiting physicians who began to further study in Beijing Anzhen Hospital

Capital Medical University from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected for humanistic management

and the visiting physicians from April 2013 to December 2015 were set as reference to conduct a questionnaire survey before and after the refresher training with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Therefore

the visiting doctors all had the conventional refresher study management mode. On this basis

the intervention group established an individualized refresher study schedule

equipped the doctors with tutors

regularly visited the doctors and organized symposiums for them

assisted them to join the academic groups of the department

organized and coordinated the doctors to participate in the multi-disciplinary academic ward rounds

conducted negative emotional relief through the Balint groups

and integrated the cultural life of the refresher doctors into the cultural construction of the hospital and follow up the refresher doctors after the refresher training. SPSS 16.0 was used to perform

t

-test and variance analysis.

Results

2

There was no difference in anxiety and depression scores between the two groups according to gender

type of refresher department

level of source hospital and length of study (

P

>

0.05). Compared with the two evaluations in the intervention group

the second scores of anxiety for men and women [(5.90±1.37) vs

.

(6.48±1.87)

(5.92±1.45) vs

.

(6.73±2.12)]

doctors in each department [(5.50±1.23) vs

.

(6.76±2.35)

(6.03±1.36) vs

.

(6.64±1.75)

(5.98±1.50) vs

.

(6.64±2.15)]

doctors from secondary and tertiary hospitals [(5.85±1.29) vs

.

(6.64±2.02)

(6.00±1.50) vs

.

(6.78± 2.14)]

the total score of doctors [(5.92±1.37) vs

.

(6.64±2.15)

(5.92±1.47)

vs

.

(6.68±1.98)] and the total score [(5.92±1.42) vs. (6.66±2.05)]

were lower than the first evaluation score (

P

<

0.05). The second scores of depression for female doctors [(6.15±1.37)

vs

.

(6.68±2.06)]

doctors in medical laboratory department [(6.02±1.40) vs

.

(6.69±1.88)]

doctors from tertiary hospital [(6.13±1.41) vs. (6.51±1.90)]

doctor with different training durations [(6.04±1.42)

vs

.

(6.50±2.02)

(6.12±1.34)

vs

.

(6.57±1.97)] and the total score of doctors [(6.09±1.37) vs

.

(6.54±1.99)] were lower than those of the first evaluation (

P

<

0.05). The anxiety score of the second evaluation in the control group was higher in male physicians [(6.63±1.15)

vs

.

(6.11±1.76)] than the first evaluation (

P

<

0.05). Compared with the second evaluation data of doctors in the two groups

in terms of anxiety scores

the scores of doctors at all levels and total scores in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (

P

<

0.05); in terms of depression score

the scores of female visiting doctors

doctors from tertiary hospitals

doctors with refresher training duration of 6 months and total score were lower than those of the control group (

P

<

0.05).

Conclusion

2

The application of humanistic management to strengthen the management of refresher physicians can improve the psychological state of refresher doctors to a certain extent

especially alleviate the anxiety state

which is a worthy promotion of refresher management mode.