
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 山西医科大学第二医院超声科
2. 山西医科大学第三医院骨科
纸质出版日期:2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]马秀玲,郭泰,芦芳.二尖瓣环位移自动追踪技术评价阵发性心房颤动患者左房收缩功能[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(05):360-364.
MA Xiuling, GUO Tai, LU Fang. Evaluation of left atrial systolic function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by tracking of mitral annular displacement technology[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021,23(5):360-364.
[1]马秀玲,郭泰,芦芳.二尖瓣环位移自动追踪技术评价阵发性心房颤动患者左房收缩功能[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(05):360-364. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2021.05.012.
MA Xiuling, GUO Tai, LU Fang. Evaluation of left atrial systolic function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by tracking of mitral annular displacement technology[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021,23(5):360-364. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2021.05.012.
目的应用二尖瓣环位移自动追踪(TMAD)技术评价阵发性心房颤动(以下简称房颤)患者左房收缩功能。方法选取30例阵发性房颤患者(病例组)和30例正常对照组
应用二维斑点追踪超声心动图(2D-STE)技术获取左室收缩期、舒张早期、舒张晚期的左房平均峰值应变率(mSRs、mSRe、mSRa)
以及经标化的左房最大容积指数(LAVimax)、最小容积指数(LAVimin)、收缩前容积指数(LAVip)
并计算左房总排空分数(LATEF)、被动排空分数(LAPEF)、主动排空分数(LAAEF);同时TMAD技术获取时间-位移曲线
测量左室收缩期二尖瓣环位移(TMAD-D)、左房收缩期二尖瓣环位移(TMAD-S);比较两组上述各参数差异。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析应变率及TMAD参数对阵发性房颤患者的诊断效能;并对TMAD参数进行重复性检验。比较两种技术测量用时。结果病例组LAVimax、LAVimin及LAVip均较对照组增大
LATEF、LAPEF、LAAEF、mSRs、mSRe、mSRa、TMAD-D、TMAD-S均较对照组减小
差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。TMAD-D、TMAD-S、mSRs、mSRa预测阵发性房颤的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.867、0.808、0.944、0.850。TMAD-D和TMAD-S观察者内组内相关系数分别为0.964、0.888
观察者间组内相关系数分别为0.918、0.860。TMAD测量用时较2D-STE明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论 TMAD可评估阵发性房颤患者左房收缩功能
与2D-STE诊断效能相当
但TMAD较2D-STE检测时间更短。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the left atrial systolic function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation(PAF)by tracking of mitral annular displacement technology(TMAD).MethodsThirty patients with PAF(case group)and 30 normal controls(control group)were selected.The mean value of the peak strain rate of left ventricular systolic
early and late diastolic of left atrium(mSRs
mSRe
mSRa)
standardized left atrial maximal volume index(LAVimax)
minimal volume index(LAVimin)and pre systolic volume index(LAVip)were obtained by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography(2 D-STE)
and left atrial total emptying fraction(LATEF)
passive emptying fraction(LAPEF) and active emptying fraction(LAAEF) were calculated. Meanwhile
the time-displacement curve was obtained by TMAD
the left ventricular systolic mitral annular displacement(TMAD-D)and left atrial systolic mitral annular displacement(TMAD-S)were measured.And the differences of above parameters were compared between the two groups.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to analyze the values of strain rate and TMAD parameters in detecting PAF.And the repeatability test of TMAD parameters was conducted.The measurement time of TMAD and 2 D-STE was recorded.Results LAVip in case group were higher
and LATEF
LAPEF
LAAEF
mSRs
mSRe
mSRa
TMAD-D
TMAD-S in case group were lower
the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The area under the ROC curve of TMAD-D
TMAD-S
mSRs and mSRa in predicting PAF were about 0.867
0.808
0.944 and 0.850
respectively.The intra-observer correlation coefficients of TMAD-D and TMAD-S mean were 0.964 and 0.888
and the inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.918 and 0.860
respectively.The measurement time of TMAD was significantly shorter than that of 2 D-STE(P<0.05).ConclusionTMAD can detect the changes of left atrial systolic function in patients with PAF
and the detection time of TMAD is shorter than that of2 D-STE.
二尖瓣环位移自动追踪技术斑点追踪二维阵发性房颤收缩功能心房左
Tracking of mitral annular displacement technologySpeckle tracking imagingtwo-dimensionalParoxysmal atrial fibrillationSystolic functionatrialleft
0
浏览量
32
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621