
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 江苏省宜兴市人民医院超声科
2. 江苏省宜兴市人民医院重症医学科
纸质出版日期:2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]邹健,戴吉,钱晴,强秋锋,陈俊杰.肺部超声评分与重症肺炎患者病情进展的相关性[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(03):208-211.
ZOU Jian, DAI Ji, QIAN Qing, et al. Correlation between lung ultrasound score and disease progression in patients with severe pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021,23(3):208-211.
[1]邹健,戴吉,钱晴,强秋锋,陈俊杰.肺部超声评分与重症肺炎患者病情进展的相关性[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(03):208-211. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2021.03.017.
ZOU Jian, DAI Ji, QIAN Qing, et al. Correlation between lung ultrasound score and disease progression in patients with severe pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021,23(3):208-211. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2021.03.017.
目的探讨肺部超声评分(LUS)与不同程度重症肺炎患者病情进展的相关性。方法选取189例重症肺炎患者为研究对象
根据急性生理与慢性健康(APACHEⅡ)评分分为非危重症组(53例)、危重症组(86例)及极危重症组(50例)
随访3个月
比较各组LUS、临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、氧合指数(OI)、肺泡-动脉氧分压差(A-aDO
2
)、机械通气时间的差异;根据LUS是否
>
16分将患者分为低LUS组108例和高LUS组81例
比较两组上述参数的差异。应用Pearson相关分析法分析LUS与CPIS、SOFA、OI、A-aDO
2
、机械通气时间的相关性。结果极危重症组LUS(21.38±6.84)分、CPIS(8.02±2.43)分、SOFA(6.72±2.24)分
均高于危重症组[(19.15±6.23)分、(7.21±2.16)分、(5.93±2.11)分]和非危重症组[(14.26±4.72)分、(6.58±2.07)分、(5.18±2.06分)]
且危重症组高于非危重症组(均P
<
0.05)。极危重症组OI(103.27±41.36)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)低于危重症组(131.45±52.41)mm Hg和非危重组(157.53±60.52)mm Hg
且危重症组低于非危重症组(均P
<
0.05);极危重症组A-aDO
2
和机械通气时间分别为(350.16±137.23)mm Hg、(7.02±1.45)d
均高于危重症组[(306.24±125.84)mm Hg、(6.23±1.36)d]和非危重症组[(238.47±107.16)mm Hg、(5.34±1.27)d]
且危重症组高于非危重症组(均P
<
0.05)。高LUS组CPIS(8.00±2.33)分、SOFA(6.79±1.41)分
均高于低LUS组(6.68±2.11)分、(5.74±1.32分)
差异均有统计学意义(均P
<
0.05)。高LUS组OI(106.08±43.21)mm Hg低于低LUS组(150.23±58.17)mm Hg
A-aDO
2
和机械通气时间[(363.78±141.39)mm Hg、(6.76±1.40)d]均高于低LUS组[(250.16±110.28)mm Hg、(5.76±1.33)d]
差异均有统计学意义(均P
<
0.05)。Pearson相关分析显示
LUS与CPIS、SOFA、A-aDO
2
、机械通气时间均呈正相关(r=0.587、0.591、0.651、0.321
P=0.002、0.003、0.000、0.041)
与OI呈负相关(r=-0.753
P=0.000)。结论 LUS与重症肺炎患者病情严重程度具有一定相关性
对临床评估肺炎疗效有一定指导价值。
Objective To explore the correlation of lung ultrasound score(LUS) and the progression of severe pneumonia patients with different severity.Methods A total of 189 patients with severe pneumonia were selected
they were divided into non-critically ill group(53 cases)
critically ill group(86 cases)
very critically ill group(50 cases)according to the acute physiology and chronic health(APACHEⅡ)score.All patients in each group was followed up for 3 months
and the LUS
clinical pulmonary infection score(CPIS)
trans-organ failure score(SOFA)
oxygenation index(OI)
alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference(A-aDO
2
)
and mechanical ventilation time among the groups were compared. The patients were divided into low LUS group(108 cases)and high LUS group(81 cases)according to whether LUS
>
16
and the differences of above parameters were compared between the two groups. The correlation between LUS and CPIS
SOFA
OI
A-aDO
2
mechanical ventilation time was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results The LUS
CPIS and SOFA of very critically ill group were(21.38±6.84)points
(8.02±2.43)points
(6.72±2.24)points
which were higher than those of critically ill group[(19.15±6.23)points
(7.21±2.16)points
(5.93±2.11)points]and non-critically ill group[(14.26±4.72)points
(6.58±2.07)points
(5.18±2.06)points]
.And the parameters of critically ill group were higher than those of non-critically ill group(all P
<
0.05).The OI of very critically ill group was(103.27±41.36)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)
which was lower than that of critically ill group(131.45 ± 52.41)mm Hg and non-critical ill group(157.53 ± 60.52)mm Hg
and the parameter of critically ill group was lower than that of non-critically ill group(all P
<
0.05).The A-aDO
2
and mechanical ventilation time of very critically ill group were(350.16 ± 137.23)mm Hg and(7.02 ± 1.45)d
which were higher than those of critical group[(306.24 ± 125.84)mm Hg
(6.23 ± 1.36)d]and non-critical group[(238.47 ± 107.16)mm Hg
(5.34 ± 1.27)d]
and the parameters of critically ill group were higher than those of the non-critically ill group(all P
<
0.05).The scores of CPIS and SOFA of high LUS group were(8.00±2.33)points and(6.79±1.41)points
which were higher than those of low LUS group[(6.68±2.11)points
(5.74±1.32)points]
the differences were statistically significant(both P
<
0.05).The OI of high LUS group was(106.08±43.21)mm Hg
which was lower than that of low LUS group(150.23±58.17)mm Hg.The A-aDO
2
and mechanical ventilation time of high LUS group were(363.78±141.39)mm Hg and(6.76±1.40)d
which were higher than those of low LUS group[(250.16±110.28)mm Hg
(5.76±1.33)d]
the differences were statistically significant(all P
<
0.05).Pearson correlation analysis showed that LUS was positively correlated with CPIS
SOFA
A-aDO
2
and mechanical ventilation time(r=0.587
0.591
0.651
0.321
P=0.002
0.003
0.000
0.041)
but negatively correlated with OI(r=-0.753
P=0.000).Conclusion LUS score is correlated with the severity of patients with severe pneumonia
which has a certain guiding value for clinical evaluation of curative effect of pneumonia.
肺部超声评分重症肺炎病情评估相关性
Lung ultrasound scoreSevere pneumoniaPrognostic assessmentCorrelation
0
浏览量
56
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621