ZHOU Caishan, CAI Qinfeng, WU Jiaying, et al. Comparative Study on Different Administration Method of Propofol in Breast Cancer Surgery[J]. 2022,(12):1472-1475.
ZHOU Caishan, CAI Qinfeng, WU Jiaying, et al. Comparative Study on Different Administration Method of Propofol in Breast Cancer Surgery[J]. 2022,(12):1472-1475. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2022.12.010.
OBJECTIVE: To probe into the effects of different administration methods of propofol on circulatory function
cerebral state index(CSI) and Th17/Treg level in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 130 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in this hospital from Jun. 2019 to Jun. 2021 were prospectively selected and divided into groups A and group B via random number table
with 65 cases in each group. Both groups were given propofol
group A was administrated by closed-loop target-controlled infusion(CLTCI)
and group B was administrated open-loop target-controlled infusion(OLTCI). The circulatory function [mean arterial pressure(MAP)
heart rate(HR)
respiratory rate(RR)
end-tidal carbon dioxide(P
ET
CO
2
)]
CSI value
postoperative Th17/Treg level
total dosage of propofol
wake-up time
extubation time
pain degree after extubation and incidence of adverse events in the two groups were observed before anesthesia induction(T
0
)
immediately after intubation(T
1
)
immediately after extubation(T
2
) and after extubation. RESULTS:(1) At T
1
T
2
and T
3
the MAP
HR and RR of group A were higher than those of group B
the CSI value and P
ET
CO
2
of group A were lower than those of group B
and the fluctuation range was smaller than that of group B
with statistically significant differences(P
<
0.05);(2) at 24 h and 72 h after surgery
the Th17 level of group A was higher than that of group B
the Treg level of group A was lower than that of group B
with statistically significant differences(P
<
0.05);(3) the total dosage of propofol in group A was less than that of group B
the wake-up time and extubation time of group A were shorter than group B
with statistically significant differences(P
<
0.05);(4) the difference in the incidences of adverse events between group A and group B [3.08%(2/65) vs. 7.69%(5/65)] was not statistically significant(P
>
0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol administrated by CLTCI is better than administrated by LTCI in terms of circulatory function
CSI and Th17/Treg levels
which can be used as one of the perioperative anesthesia management programs for breast cancer patients.
关键词
乳腺癌手术丙泊酚闭环靶控输注循环功能脑功能状态指数Th17/Treg
Keywords
Breast cancerSurgeryPropofolClosed-loop target-controlled infusionCirculatory functionCerebral state indexTh17/Treg