LI Daixiao, YING Yingqiu, YANG Li, et al. Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone and Sulbactam in the Treatment of Lower Respiratory Infection[J]. 2022,22(1):59-63.
LI Daixiao, YING Yingqiu, YANG Li, et al. Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone and Sulbactam in the Treatment of Lower Respiratory Infection[J]. 2022,22(1):59-63. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2022.01.013.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of cefoperazone and sulbactam in the treatment of lower respiratory infection. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials on cefoperazone and sulbactam in the treatment of lower respiratory infection( the intervention group was given cefoperazone and sulbactam
no limits for dosage and courses; the control group was given other antibiotics
such as piperacillin tazobactam
ceftazidime
levofloxacin and moxifloxacin
also no limits for dosage and courses) were retrieved from the Cochrane Library
PubMed
Embase
CNKI and Wanfang Data
and the search date was up to Jun. 2021. After literature screening and data extracting
the literature quality was evaluated using the assessment tool of risk bias recommended in the Cochrane Systematic Assessor ’s Handbook 5. 1
and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. 3 software. RESULTS:Totally 16 studies were finally enrolled
including 1 347 patients. Results of Meta-analysis indicated that the difference in clinical effective rate between intervention group and control group had no statistical significance( OR = 1. 18
95%CI = 0. 87-1. 61
P>0. 05); in the subgroup analysis with piperacillin tazobactam as a control
the difference in clinical efficiency between intervention group and control group still had no statistical significance( OR = 0. 80
95%CI = 0. 39-1. 65
P>0. 05). The difference in bacterial clearance rate between intervention group and control group had no statistical significance( OR = 1. 13
95% CI = 0. 76-1. 68
P >0. 05); in the subgroup analysis with piperacillin tazobactam as control
the difference in bacterial clearance rate between intervention group and control group still had no statistical significance( OR = 0. 76
95%CI = 0. 31-1. 91
P>0. 05); There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between intervention group and control group( OR = 0. 97
95% CI = 0. 58-1. 62
P>0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: The cefoperazone and sulbactam has similar clinical efficacy and safety with control drugs in the treatment of lower respiratory infection.
关键词
头孢哌酮舒巴坦下呼吸道感染有效性安全性
Keywords
Cefoperazone and sulbactamLower respiratory infectionEfficacySafety