
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 陕西中医药大学药学院
2. 上海市宝山区中西医结合医院神经内科
3. 中国中医科学院医学实验中心
纸质出版日期:2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
王卓媛, 黄颖, 苟小军, 等. 拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫疗效与安全性的系统评价[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2021,21(11):1371-1376.
WANG Zhuoyuan, HUANG Ying, Gou Xiaojun, et al. Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Lamotrigine Combined with Sodium Valproate in the Treatment of Seizure[J]. 2021,21(11):1371-1376.
王卓媛, 黄颖, 苟小军, 等. 拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫疗效与安全性的系统评价[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2021,21(11):1371-1376. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.11.021.
WANG Zhuoyuan, HUANG Ying, Gou Xiaojun, et al. Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Lamotrigine Combined with Sodium Valproate in the Treatment of Seizure[J]. 2021,21(11):1371-1376. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.11.021.
目的:系统评价拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的临床疗效与安全性。方法:通过计算机检索Pub Med、the Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库和维普数据库
检索建库至2021年1月发表的拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的随机对照研究文献(研究组患者服用拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠
对照组患者服用丙戊酸钠)
采用改良Jadad评分表进行文献质量评价
提取有效率、癫痫发作频率、癫痫发作时间以及超敏C反应蛋白水平为参数
应用Rev Man 5.3软件进行荟萃分析(Meta分析)、敏感性分析及发表偏倚检测。结果:共纳入18篇符合标准的随机对照研究文献
总病例数为1 430例(研究组713例
对照组717例)。Meta分析结果显示
两组患者的总有效率(OR=3.90
95%CI=2.85~5.33
Z=8.51
P <0.000 01)、癫痫发作持续时间(MD=-3.27
95%CI=-3.59~-2.95
Z=20.16
P <0.000 01)、癫痫发作频率(MD=-1.82
95%CI=-2.21~-1.43
Z=9.17
P <0.000 01)和超敏C反应蛋白水平(MD=-3.79
95%CI=-4.05~-3.53
Z=28.65
P <0.000 01)比较
差异均有统计学意义
研究组患者上述指标水平明显优于对照组;研究组患者的不良反应发生情况明显比对照组少
差异有统计学意义(OR=0.45
95%CI=0.33~0.62
Z=4.99
P <0.000 01)。结论:拉莫三嗪联合丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的综合疗效以及不良反应发生情况优于单独使用丙戊酸钠治疗
且在减少癫痫发作频率、缩短癫痫发作持续时间和降低超敏C反应蛋白水平方面的效果明显优于单独使用丙戊酸钠治疗。
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of lamotrigine combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of seizure. METHODS: PubMed
the Cochrane Library
Embase
CNKI
Wanfang database and VIP database were retrieved to collect the randomized controlled trials of lamotrigine combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of seizure( the study group was treated with lamotrigine combined with sodium valproate
while the control group received sodium valproate). The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to Jan. 2021. The modified Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the literature
efficiency
seizure frequency
seizure duration and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were extracted as the parameters. Meta-analysis
sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were performed by using Rev Man 5. 3 software. RESULTS: A total of 18 randomized controlled trials that met the criteria were included in the literature
with a total of 1 430 cases( 713 in the study group and 717 in the control group). Meta-analysis results showed that the differences of total effective rate( OR = 3. 90
95% CI = 2. 85-5. 33
Z = 8. 51
P < 0. 000 01) and seizure duration( MD =-3. 27
95% CI =-3. 59--2. 95
Z = 20. 16
P <0. 000 01)
seizure frequency( MD =-1. 82
95% CI =-2. 21--1. 43
Z = 9. 17
P < 0. 000 01) and high-sensitivity Creactive protein level( MD =-3. 79
95% CI =-4. 05--3. 53
Z = 28. 65
P < 0. 000 01) in two groups were statistically significant
and the levels of above indicators in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse drug reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group
and the difference was statistically significant( OR = 0. 45
95% CI = 0. 33-0. 62
Z = 4. 99
P < 0. 000 01).CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of seizure is better than valproate alone in the comprehensive efficacy and adverse drug reactions
and significantly better than that of valproate alone in reducing seizure frequency
shortening seizure duration
and lowering hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels.
拉莫三嗪丙戊酸钠癫痫系统评价
LamotrigineSodium valproateSeizureSystematic review
0
浏览量
162
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621