
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 陆军军医大学第二附属医院疼痛康复科
2. 重庆市药品技术审评认证中心
纸质出版日期:2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]王珊珊,刘勇,曾昕.不同剂量利多卡因静脉滴注治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效和安全性及对镇痛药用量的影响[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2020,20(07):769-772+777.
WANG Shanshan, LIU Yong, ZENG Xin. Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion on Postherpetic Neuralgia and Its Effects on Dosage of Analgesic Drugs[J]. 2020,20(7):769-772.
[1]王珊珊,刘勇,曾昕.不同剂量利多卡因静脉滴注治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效和安全性及对镇痛药用量的影响[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2020,20(07):769-772+777. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2020.07.001.
WANG Shanshan, LIU Yong, ZENG Xin. Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion on Postherpetic Neuralgia and Its Effects on Dosage of Analgesic Drugs[J]. 2020,20(7):769-772. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2020.07.001.
目的:探讨不同剂量利多卡因静脉滴注治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效、安全性及对镇痛药用量的影响。方法:选取2018年1月至2019年6月陆军军医大学第二附属医院疼痛科确诊收治的带状疱疹神经痛患者为研究对象
共180例
按照随机数字表法分为常规组、利多卡因A组和利多卡因B组
每组60例。常规组患者给予常规药物治疗
利多卡因A组患者在常规药物治疗的基础上给予静脉滴注0.1%利多卡因100 ml/d
利多卡因B组患者在常规药物治疗的基础上给予静脉滴注0.1%利多卡因200 ml/d。观察两组患者入院时(D
0
)、治疗第1日(D
1
)、治疗第3日(D
3
)及治疗第7日(D
7
)的疼痛情况[视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale
VAS)]、睡眠情况[睡眠质量评分(quality of sleep
QS)]
、负性情绪情况[汉密尔顿焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety scale
HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Hamilton depression scale
HAMD)]、镇痛药使用情况及不良反应发生情况。结果:利多卡因A组、利多卡因B组患者在D
1
、D
3
及D
7
的VAS评分和QS评分明显低于常规组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05)
且利多卡因B组患者D
7
的VAS评分和D
1
、D
3
及D
7
的QS评分明显低于利多卡因A组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05)。利多卡因A组、利多卡因B组患者在D
1
、D
3
及D
7
的HAMA评分和D
3
、D
7
的HAMD评分明显低于常规组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05)
且利多卡因B组患者D
7
的HAMA评分和HAMD评分明显低于利多卡因A组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05)。利多卡因A组、利多卡因B组患者在D
3
、D
7
的氨酚羟考酮用量和D
7
的曲马多用量明显低于常规组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05);利多卡因B组患者D
3
的曲马多用量明显低于常规组
差异有统计学意义(P
<
0.05);利多卡因B组患者D
3
、D
7
的氨酚羟考酮用量和D
7
的曲马多用量明显低于利多卡因A组
差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05)。三组患者均未因严重不良反应无法完成治疗
三组间不良反应总发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P
>
0.05)。结论:利多卡因治疗带状疱疹后神经痛具有良好的临床疗效
可减少曲马多等镇痛药的用量
不增加药品不良反应
安全性好;且利多卡因200 ml/d的效果更优。
OBJECTIVE: To probe into the clinical efficacy and safety of different doses of lidocaine intravenous infusion on postherpetic neuralgia and its effects on dosage of analgesic drugs.METHODS: Totally 180 patients with postherpetic neuralgia diagnosed in the pain department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University from Jan.2018 to Jun.2019 were selected to be divided into the conventional group
the lidocaine group A and the lidocaine group B via the random number table
with 60 cases in each group.The conventional group were treated with conventional drugs
the lidocaine group A were given intravenous infusion of 0.1% lidocaine 100 ml/d on the basis of conventional drugs
and the lidocaine B group received intravenous infusion of 0.1% lidocaine 200 ml/d on the basis of conventional drugs.Pain status [visual analogue scale( VAS) ]
sleep status [quality of sleep score( QS) ]
negative mood status [Hamilton anxiety scale( HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale( HAMD) ]
the application of analgesics and adverse drug reactions were observed in admission( D
0
)
the treatment day 1( D
1
)
the treatment day 3( D
3
) and the treatment day 7( D
7
).RESULTS: The VAS score and QS score of lidocaine group A and lidocaine group B were significantly lower than those of the conventional group in D
1
D
3
and D
7
the difference was statistically significant( P
<
0.05).The VAS score in D
7
and QS score in D
1
D
3
and D
7
of lidocaine group B were significantly lower than those of lidocaine group A
the difference was statistically significant( P
<
0.05).The HAMA score in D
1
D
3
and D
7
and HAMD score in D
3
and D
7
of lidocaine group A and lidocaine group B were significantly lower than those of the conventional group( P
<
0.05)
and the HAMA score and HAMD score in D
7
of lidocaine group B were significantly lower than those of lidocaine group A
with statistically significant differences( P
<
0.05).The doses of oxycodone and acetaminophen in D
3
and D
7
and tramadol in D
7
in lidocaine group A and lidocaine group B in D
3
and D
7
were significantly lower than those in the conventional group
the differences were statistically significant( P
<
0.05); the doses of tramadol in D
3
in lidocaine group B were significantly lower than that in the conventional group
with statistically significant difference( P
<
0.05)
and the doses of oxycodone and acetaminophen in D
3
and D
7
and tramadol in D
7
in lidocaine group B were significantly lower than those in lidocaine group A
with statistically significant differences( P
<
0.05).None of the patients in three groups could not complete the treatment due to severe adverse drug reactions
and the difference in the total incidence of adverse drug reactions among three groups was not statistically significant( P
>
0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine has significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia
and can reduce the dosage of tramadol and other analgesic drugs
without increasing the adverse drug reactions and the safety is higher.Moreover
the effect of 200 ml/d lidocaine is better.
带状疱疹后神经痛疼痛利多卡因安全性
Postherpetic neuralgiaPainLidocaineSafety
0
浏览量
97
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621