Objective:We comparison and evaluation four methods of urinary sediment

there are DiaSys（R/S 2003）urinary sediment quantitative analysis workstation

Fast Read

102

urinary sediment quantitative counting plate

improved blood cell counting chamber

UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer.Methods:Treated the urine sample with standard operation process

quantitative analyzed the sample with four methods as above

then compared the result and evaluated those methods. Results:we got good reproducibility with each method

compared to the result of Read

102

urinary sediment quantitative counting plate

only that of UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had difference significantly

P

<

0.05;and the reference range existed signifi- cant difference too

compared with others methods.Conclusion:UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had important role in the scanning test of urinary sediment

but it can not replace the manual microscopy inspection.