QIU Junfeng, et al. Comparison between Automation Urine Analyzer and Results of Handwork of Testing Hydrothorax and Hydroperitonium[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2005,(6):852-853.
QIU Junfeng, et al. Comparison between Automation Urine Analyzer and Results of Handwork of Testing Hydrothorax and Hydroperitonium[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2005,(6):852-853. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2005.06.020.
Objective;Discussing clinical utilization of Automation Urine Analyszer in the testing Hydrothorax and Hydroperitonium. Methods:Testing 80 specimen got from our clinci and patient by using Uritest-200 equipemnt to get the results of PRO and SC
using UF - 100 to get the results of RBC
WBC
EC which can be compared with the results which got by handwork. Results:Comparison between Uritest-200 and handwork method
PRO and SG usex2 examination
the results have very siginficant differ( P <0. 01) ; Comparison between UF - 100 and handwork method
the results use t examination
RBC have no significant differ (P < 0. 05)
WBC have significant differ(P <0. 05). Conclusions: Uritest-200 can not be used in examine hydrothorax and hydroperitonium’ s Pro and SG; UF -100 can be used in examine the RBC with hydrothorax and hydroperitouium
but can not be used in examine the WBC. EC can be as the reference indicator with perform cells group and desguamate cells examine.
关键词
常规检测胸腹水自动化尿液分析仪
Keywords
Normal regulations checksHydrothorax and HydroperitoniumAutomation Urine Analyzer