浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
癫痫诊断技术的研究进展
Advances in diagnosis technology of epilepsy
- 重庆医科大学学报 2021年46卷第7期 页码：744-749
- 作者机构：
四川大学华西医院医院神经内科，成都 610000
- 作者简介：
[ "郭昆典，Email：93502563@qq.com，研究方向：癫痫及自身免疫性脑炎。" ]
洪桢，博士，博导，教授，华西医院神经内科副主任、华西医院上锦分院神经内科主任。留学美国华盛顿大学及克利夫兰医学中心。中国医师协会神经病学分会感染及脑脊液学组委员，中国医师协会神经病学分会青年委员会委员，中华医学会神经病学分会感染性疾病及脑脊液细胞学组委员，四川省癫痫协会常务理事，四川省医学会青年委员会副主任委员，四川省康复医学会认知障碍学组组长。主持国家自然科学基金项目3项，科技部重点项目子课题、博士后面上基金、四川省科技厅支撑项目等多项；以第一作者或通讯作者发表SCI论文30余篇，包括Brain、Neurology、Epilepsia等专业知名杂志，单篇引用率500余次，国内外论文共50余篇；国家发明专利1项，参与国家统编教材编写主编专著1部；获ESI高被引论文、上海市优秀博士论文奖，上海市明治乳液生命科学奖，获华西医院杰出青年科学家称号、四川省学术和技术带头人后备人选，获中国医师协会杰出神经病学青年医师奖、四川省医学会科技奖一等奖（排名第一）。研究方向：癫痫及其相关疾病，特别是神经感染性疾病、自身免疫性脑炎的诊疗。Email：45713152@qq.com。
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002855
中图分类号： R749.1+5纸质出版日期：2021-07-28，
收稿日期：2021-02-27，
扫 描 看 全 文
郭昆典, 洪桢. 癫痫诊断技术的研究进展[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2021,46(7):744-749.
Kundian Guo, Zhen Hong. Advances in diagnosis technology of epilepsy[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021,46(7):744-749.
郭昆典, 洪桢. 癫痫诊断技术的研究进展[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2021,46(7):744-749. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002855.
Kundian Guo, Zhen Hong. Advances in diagnosis technology of epilepsy[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021,46(7):744-749. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002855.
摘要
癫痫作为世界上最常见的神经系统疾病之一，对患者造成神经生物学、认知和社会心理等方面的不良影响。因此及时明确癫痫的诊断并给予相应的治疗对改善患者的预后具有重大意义。随着科学技术的不断进步，癫痫的诊断技术日渐完善。本文从神经影像学、神经电生理、遗传学、体液检查、神经心理学、免疫学和人工智能等方面入手，就近年来癫痫诊断技术的研究进展作一综述，并展望未来，力图阐释临床上癫痫诊断的现状和进展。
Abstract
As one of the most common neurological diseases in the world
epilepsy has numerous neurobiological
cognitive and psychosocial consequences. Timely diagnosis of epilepsy and appropriate treatment is of great significance to improve patient outcomes. As science and technology advances
diagnosis of epilepsy is being increasingly improved. This article will start with aspects of neuroimaging
nerve electrophysiology
genetics
body fluid examination
neuropsychology
immunology and artificial intelligence
review advances in the diagnosis of epilepsy and look forward to the future. We are trying to explain the status and progress of clinical diagnosis of epilepsy.
关键词
癫痫诊断进展
Keywords
epilepsydiagnosisadvance
references
Thijs RD, Surges R, O’Brien TJ, et al. Epilepsy in adults[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10172):689-701.
何晨敏, 金搏, 汪珊, 等. 磁共振阴性局灶性癫痫的常用影像学后处理技术研究进展[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2020, 53(6):469-474.
Chaudhary UJ, Duncan JS. Applications of blood-oxygen-leveldependent functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in epilepsy[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2014, 24(4):671-694.
Tae WS, Ham BJ, Pyun SB, et al. Current clinical applications of diffusion-tensor imaging in neurological disorders[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2018, 14(2):129-140.
Eryurt B, Oner AY, Ucar M, et al. Presurgical evaluation of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with multiple advanced MR techniques at 3 T[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2015, 42(5):283-290.
Xu MY, Ergene E, Zagardo M, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in patients with structural MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. J Neuroimaging, 2015, 25(6):1030-1037.
Reyes A, Thesen T, Wang X, et al. Resting-state functional MRI distinguishes temporal lobe epilepsy subtypes[J]. Epilepsia, 2016, 57(9):1475-1484.
Shah MN, Nguyen RD, Pao LP, et al. Role of resting state MRI temporal latency in refractory pediatric extratemporal epilepsy lateralization[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 49(5):1347-1355.
Koster I, Ossenblok P, Brekelmans GJ, et al. Sensitivity of magnetoencephalography as a diagnostic tool for epilepsy: a prospective study[J]. Epileptic Disord, 2020, 22(3):264-272.
Duez L, Tankisi H, Hansen PO, et al. Electromagnetic source imaging in presurgical workup of patients with epilepsy: a prospective study[J]. Neurology, 2019, 92(6):e576-e586.
Zijlmans M, Zweiphenning W, Van Klink N. Changing concepts in presurgical assessment for epilepsy surgery[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2019, 15(10):594-606.
Muhlhofer W, Tan YL, Mueller SG, et al. MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: what do we know?[J]. Epilepsia, 2017, 58(5):727-742.
Ding Y, Zhu Y, Jiang B, et al. 18F-FDG PET and high-resolution MRI co-registration for pre-surgical evaluation of patients with conventional MRI-negative refractory extra-temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2018, 45(9):1567-1572.
Krsek P, Kudr M, Jahodova A, et al. Localizing value of ictal SPECT is comparable to MRI and EEG in children with focal cortical dysplasia[J]. Epilepsia, 2013, 54(2):351-358.
Von Oertzen TJ, Mormann F, Urbach H, et al. Prospective use of subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI(SISCOM)in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2011, 52(12):2239-2248.
Jones AL, Cascino GD. Evidence on use of neuroimaging for surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2016, 73(4):464-470.
Wang I, Oh S, Blumcke I, et al. Value of 7 T MRI and post-processing in patients with nonlesional 3 T MRI undergoing epilepsy presurgical evaluation[J]. Epilepsia, 2020, 61(11):2509-2520.
De Ciantis A, Barba C, Tassi L, et al. 7 T MRI in focal epilepsy with unrevealing conventional field strength imaging[J]. Epilepsia, 2016, 57(3):445-454.
Feyissa AM, Britton JW, Van Gompel J, et al. High density scalp EEG in frontal lobe epilepsy[J]. Epilepsy Res, 2017, 129:157-161.
Hamaneh MB, Limotai C, Luders HO. Sphenoidal electrodes significantly change the results of source localization of interictal spikes for a large percentage of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 28(4):373-379.
Jobst BC, Bartolomei F, Diehl B, et al. Intracranial EEG in the 21st century[J]. Epilepsy Curr, 2020, 20(7):180-188.
Skoch J, Adelson PD, Bhatia S, et al. Subdural grid and depth electrode monitoring in pediatric patients[J]. Epilepsia, 2017, 58 S1:56-65.
Yan H, Katz JS, Anderson M, et al. Method of invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery and seizure freedom and morbidity: a systematic review[J]. Epilepsia, 2019, 60(9):1960-1972.
Sueri C, Gasparini S, Balestrini S, et al. Diagnostic biomarkers of epilepsy[J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2018, 19(6):440-450.
Roehri N, Pizzo F, Lagarde S, et al. High-frequency oscillations are not better biomarkers of epileptogenic tissues than spikes[J]. Ann Neurol, 2018, 83(1):84-97.
Sharma P, Hussain A, Greenwood R. Precision in pediatric epilepsy[J]. F1000Res, 2019, 2019:8(F1000 Faculty Rev):163.
Striano P, Minassian BA. From genetic testing to precision medicine in epilepsy[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2020, 17(2):609-615.
Ko A, Youn SE, Kim SH, et al. Targeted gene panel and genotype-phenotype correlation in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy[J]. Epilepsy Res, 2018, 141:48-55.
Xiao W, Liu C, Zhong K, et al. CpG methylation signature defines human temporal lobe epilepsy and predicts drug-resistant[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2020, 26(10):1021-1030.
Kobow K, Ziemann M, Kaipananickal H, et al. Genomic DNA methylation distinguishes subtypes of human focal cortical dysplasia[J]. Epilepsia, 2019, 60(6):1091-1103.
Asadi-Pooya AA, Tajbakhsh A, Savardashtaki A. MicroRNAs in temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review[J]. Neurol Sci, 2021, 42(2):571-578.
莫若, 杨艳玲, 张尧. 常以癫痫形式发病的遗传代谢病[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2020, 35(7):506-510.
De Vries EE, Van Den Munckhof B, Braun KP, et al. Inflammatory mediators in human epilepsy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016, 63:177-190.
Alapirtti T, Lehtimaki K, Nieminen R, et al. The production of IL-6 in acute epileptic seizure: a video-EEG study[J]. J Neuroimmunol, 2018, 316:50-55.
Zhang H, Tan JZ, Luo J, et al. Chitinase-3-like protein 1 may be a potential biomarker in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy[J]. Neurochem Int, 2019, 124:62-67.
Sundararajan T, Tesar GE, Jimenez XF. Biomarkers in the diagnosis and study of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a systematic review[J]. Seizure, 2016, 35:11-22.
Shi LM, Chen RJ, Zhang H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neuron specific enolase, interleukin-1beta and erythropoietin concentrations in children after seizures[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2017, 33(5):805-811.
Wang R, Zeng GQ, Liu X, et al. Evaluation of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 as a biomarker for diagnosis of epilepsy[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2016, 367:291-297.
Asadollahi M, Simani L. The diagnostic value of serum UCHL-1 and S100-B levels in differentiate epileptic seizures from psychogenic attacks[J]. Brain Res, 2019, 1704:11-15.
Hamberger MJ, MacAllister WS, Seidel WT, et al. Noninvasive identification of seizure lateralization in children: name that thing[J]. Neurology, 2019, 92(1):e1-e8.
Umfleet LG, Janecek JK, Quasney E, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of memory and naming tests for identifying left temporal-lobe epilepsy[J]. Appl Neuropsychol Adult, 2015, 22(3):189-196.
Norrelgen F, Lilja A, Ingvar M, et al. Presurgical language lateralization assessment by fMRI and dichotic listening of pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy[J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2015, 7:230-239.
Brown FC, Hirsch LJ, Spencer DD. Spatial memory for asymmetrical dot locations predicts lateralization among patients with presurgical mesial temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2015, 52(Pt A):19-24.
Soble JR, Eichstaedt KE, Waseem H, et al. Clinical utility of the Wechsler Memory Scale—Fourth Edition(WMS-Ⅳ)in predicting laterality of temporal lobe epilepsy among surgical candidates[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2014, 41:232-237.
李艾青, 周东, 洪桢. 解读ILAE关于“继发于自身免疫性脑炎的急性症状性痫性发作和自身免疫相关性癫痫”最新概念[J]. 癫痫杂志, 2020, 6(6):507-509.
Dalmau J, Geis C, Graus F. Autoantibodies to synaptic receptors and neuronal cell surface proteins in autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system[J]. Physiol Rev, 2017, 97(2):839-887.
张莉莉, 朱洁. 神经系统自身免疫性疾病的抗体检测及临床意义[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(4):396-402.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- 网络PDF下载
- XML下载
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies
