
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
重庆医科大学附属第一医院耳鼻咽喉科
纸质出版日期:2016,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]雷艳,康厚墉,胡国华,李伟,钱怡,潘小燕,马国庭.耳蜗电图SP/AP面积比在梅尼埃病诊断中的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(06):632-636.
Lei Yan, Kang Houyong, Hu Guohua, et al. Application of SP/AP area ratio of electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2016,41(6):632-636.
[1]雷艳,康厚墉,胡国华,李伟,钱怡,潘小燕,马国庭.耳蜗电图SP/AP面积比在梅尼埃病诊断中的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2016,41(06):632-636. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000981.
Lei Yan, Kang Houyong, Hu Guohua, et al. Application of SP/AP area ratio of electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2016,41(6):632-636. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000981.
目的:分析比较耳蜗电图(electrocochleography
ECoch G)中总和电位(summating potential
SP)与动作电位(action potential
AP)的幅度比和面积比两种方法在梅尼埃病(Meniere’s disease
MD)诊断中的应用价值。方法:样本总量为96名成人受试者(共测试123耳)。将其分为3组:对照组由56名听功能正常的受试者组成(共测试76耳)
确诊MD组25人(单耳21人
双耳4人
共测试29耳);疑似MD组15人(单耳12人
双耳3人
共18耳)。将对照组的SP/AP幅度比与面积比的95%参考值上限作为阳性参考值
分别计算确诊MD组和可疑MD组的振幅比和面积比阳性率
比较两种方法阳性率的差异性及统计学意义。结果:对照组所得SP/AP幅度比95%参考值范围为:0.01
0
.32
以
>
0.32为阳性标准;SP/AP面积比95%参考值范围为:0.68
1
.82
以
>
1.82为阳性标准。确诊MD组中
幅度比的阳性检出率为14.29%(15/105)
面积比的阳性检出率为25.71%(27/105)
面积比阳性率高于振幅比阳性率(χ
2
=6.050
P=0.014)。可疑MD组中
幅度比阳性率为16.67%(3/18);面积比阳性率为77.78%(14/18)。两者阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ
2
=9.091
P=0.003)
其面积比阳性率高于振幅比阳性率。结论:同SP/AP幅度比相比较
面积比在梅尼埃疾病的诊断中更具有优势。
Objective:To analyze and compare summating potential(SP)and action potential(AP)in electrocochleogram for diagnosing Meniere’s disease(MD). Methods:All 96 adults(123 ears)were divided into three groups:control group
MD diagnosed group
MD suspected group. Control group was consisted of 56 subjects with normal function of hearing(76 ears were tested);MD diagnosed group was consisted of 25 subjects(29 ears from 21 subjects with single ear and 4 subjects with double ears);MD suspected group was composed of 15 subjects(18 ears from 12 subjects with single ear and 3 subjects with double ears). The SP/AP amplitude ratio and SP/AP area ratio of MD suspected group and MD diagnosed group were compared. Results:The SP/AP amplitude ratio from 95%reference of control group ranged from 0.01 to 0.32
and the positive standard was higher than 0.32;the SP/AP area ratio from 95%reference was 0. 68-1. 82
and the positive standard was higher than 1.82. In MD diagnosed group
the positive rate of the SP/AP amplitude ratio was 14.29%(15 out of 105);the positive rate of SP/AP area ratio was 25.71%(27 out of 105);the positive ratio of SP/AP area ratio was higher than that of amplitude ratio(χ2=6.050
P=0.014). In MD suspected group
the positive rate of SP/AP amplitude ratio was 16.67%(3 out of 18)and the positive rate of SP/AP area ratio was 77.78%(14 out of 18). There were statistical differences between SP/AP area ratio and amplitude ratio(χ2=9.091
P=0.003);the positive ratio of SP/AP area ratio was higher than that of SP/AP amplitude ratio. Conclusion:SP/AP area ratio is superior to SP/AP amplitude ratio in diagnozing MD.
耳蜗电图梅尼埃病总和电位/动作电位幅度比面积比
electrocochleographyMeniere’s diseasesummating potential/action potentialamplitude ratioarea ratio
0
浏览量
231
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621