Wang Tao, Fei Jiandong, Nie Shuangfa, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus traditional transanal excision for rectal neoplasms:systematic review[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2016,41(3):307-310.
Wang Tao, Fei Jiandong, Nie Shuangfa, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus traditional transanal excision for rectal neoplasms:systematic review[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2016,41(3):307-310. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.000869.
目的:比较肛门内镜微创手术和标准经肛门局切术治疗直肠肿瘤的疗效及安全性。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase、The Cochrane Library和中国期刊全文数据库及万方数据库中1990至2015年比较肛门内镜微创手术和标准经肛门局切术治疗直肠肿瘤的随机对照试验或对照试验。使用Rev Man 5.3软件对术后并发症发生率、切缘阴性率、样本破碎率及复发率进行meta分析。结果:共6篇文献927例患者入选研究
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM)and traditional transanal excision(TAE)for rectal neoplasms. Methods:Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)or comparative studies comparing TEM with TAE for rectal neoplasms published from 1990 to 2015 were searched in Pubmed
Embase
The Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
Wanfang Data. Review manager 5.3 was used for Meta-analysis and postoperative complication rate
negative microscopic margins
specimen fragmentation and lesion recurrence were analyzed and compared. Results:A total of 6 studies including 927 patients were identified and analyzed. The results showed no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate(RR=0.92
95%CI=0.65 to 1.31
P=0.660). The rate of negative microscopic margins was higher in TEM(RR=1.30
95%CI=1.06 to1.58
P=0.010). However
specimen fragmentation(RR=0.16
95%CI=0.08 to 0.29
P=0.000)and lesion recurrence(RR=0.32
95%CI=0.22 to 0.46
P=0.000)were more frequently observed in TAE group. Conclusion:TEM is superior to TAE in increasing negative microscopic margins and reducing specimen fragmentation and lesion recurrence.