
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.唐山职业技术学院附属医院普外一科,河北 唐山 063000
2.唐山职业技术学院附属医院内镜室,河北 唐山 063000
3.唐山市人民医院乳腺外科,河北 唐山 063000
李昊楠,E-mail:Haonan1983Li@126.com
纸质出版日期:2024-10-25,
收稿日期:2023-11-23,
移动端阅览
李昊楠,王静,李润华等.以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路在腹腔镜解剖性右半肝切除术中的应用[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(10):854-858.
LI Hao-nan,WANG Jing,LI Run-hua,et al.Application of the Glisson hepatic pedicle priority approach marked by APR triangle in laparoscopic anatomic right hemihepatectomy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(10):854-858.
李昊楠,王静,李润华等.以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路在腹腔镜解剖性右半肝切除术中的应用[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(10):854-858. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.11E023103.
LI Hao-nan,WANG Jing,LI Run-hua,et al.Application of the Glisson hepatic pedicle priority approach marked by APR triangle in laparoscopic anatomic right hemihepatectomy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(10):854-858. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.11E023103.
目的
2
研究以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路在腹腔镜解剖性右半肝切除术(LARH)中的应用效果。
方法
2
回顾性分析唐山职业技术学院附属医院收治的66例行LARH的患者临床资料。根据手术入路将患者分为鞘外组和APR组,鞘外组35例患者采用经Glisson肝蒂鞘外解剖入路行LARH,APR组31例患者采用以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路行LARH。对2组患者的围术期相关指标、术后并发症情况、氧化应激及肝功能指标等临床资料进行统计学分析,并比较2组间的差异。
结果
2
APR组患者的手术时间及术中出血量较鞘外组短/少,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);而2组患者术中
输血比例、引流管留置时间、首次排气时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。2组患者术后各时间点的丙二醛(MDA)、皮质醇(Cor)及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),且APR组患者术后各时间点的MDA、Cor及SOD水平均显著优于鞘外组(
P
<
0.05)。2组患者术后各时间点的白蛋白(ALB)、总胆红素(TBil)、谷草转氨酶(AST)及谷丙转氨酶(ALT)水平与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),且APR组患者术后各时间点的ALB、TBil、AST及ALT水平均显著优于鞘外组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
与Glisson肝蒂鞘外解剖入路相比,在LARH中采用以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路手术时间短、出血少、氧化应激反应程度轻,有利于术后肝功能的恢复。
Objective
2
To study the application effect of Glisson hepatic pedicle priority approach marked by APR triangle in laparoscopic anatomic right hemihepatectomy (LARH).
Methods
2
The clinical data of 66 patients underwent LARH in the Affiliated Hospital of Tangshan Vocational and Technical College were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approaches,the patients were divided into the extrathecal group and the APR group.The 35 patients of the extrathecal group underwent LARH via Glisson hepatic pedicle extrathecal approach.The 31 patients of the APR group were treated with LARH through the Glisson hepatic pedicle priority approach marked by APR triangle. The clinical data including perioperative indexes,postoperative complications,oxidative stress and liver function indexes of patients in the two groups were statistically analyzed,and the differences between the two groups were compared.
Results
2
The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of patients in the APR group were significantly shorter/less than those in the extrathecal group,with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05). There was no significant differences in the intraoperative blood transfusion ratio,drainage tube indwelling time,first exhaust time,postoperative hospitalization time or postoperative complications of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA),cortisol (Cor) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) at each time point after surgery of patients in the two groups were significantly different from those before surgery (
P
<
0.05),and the levels of MDA,Cor and SOD at each time point after surgery of patients in the APR group were significantly better than those in the extrathecal group (
P
<
0.05). The levels of albumin (ALB),total bilirubin (TBil),aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at each time point after surgery of patients in the two groups were significantly different from those before surgery (
P
<
0.05).Moreover,the levels of ALB,TBil,AST and ALT at each time point after surgery of patients in the APR group were significantly better than those in the extrathecal group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with the Glisson hepatic pedicle extrathecal approach,the Glisson hepatic pedicle priority approach marked by APR triangle in LARH has shorter operation time,less bleeding and less oxidative stress reaction,which is beneficial to the recovery of liver function after surgery.
Glisson肝蒂腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术手术入路
Glisson hepatic pediclelaparoscopeanatomic hepatectomysurgical approach
Reich H,McGlynn F,DeCaprio J,et al.Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions[J].Obstet Gynecol,1991,78(5 Pt 2):956-958.
刘景丰,黄尧,曾永毅,等.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术切面确定原则[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(3):220-223.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.03.002.
刘杰,成剑.肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术的若干问题再议[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2020,32(5):265-269.doi:10.11952/j.issn. 1007-1954.2020.05.003http://dx.doi.org/10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2020.05.003.
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会,《中华消化外科杂志》编辑委员会.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术操作流程及技术标准中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023,22(7):810-823. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230714-00410http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230714-00410.
Zheng K,Liao A,Yan L,et al.Laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy (S3 and S4b) using the Glisson's pedicle-first and intrahepatic anatomic markers approach[J].Surg Endosc,2022,36(10):7859-7860.doi:10.1007/s00464-022-09448-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09448-8.
肖亮,周乐杜.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术入路选择[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(1):9-15.doi:10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947. 2021.01.002http://dx.doi.org/10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2021.01.002.
Chen J,Zhang Z,Zhou R,et al.The APR triangle:a practical zone in the Glissonean approach to laparoscopic anatomical right hepatectomy[J].iLIVER,2022,1(3):176-180.doi:10.1016/J.ILIVER.2022. 08.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ILIVER.2022.08.004.
曹君,陈亚进.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除治疗肝癌的规范与思考[J].外科理论与实践,2022,27(2):123-127.doi:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2022.02.007http://dx.doi.org/10.16139/j.1007-9610.2022.02.007.
Zheng J,Liang X.Laparoscopic anatomic portal territory hepatectomy:a trend toward a personalized liver surgery[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2020,7(13):5181-5182.doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08596-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08596-2.
陈义发,梁宾勇,窦磊.肝切除血流控制技术的合理化选择[J].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2019,8(1):17-19.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.01.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.01.003.
Ciria R,Berardi G,Nishino H,et al.A snapshot of the 2020 conception of anatomic liver resections and their applicability on minimally invasive liver surgery.A preparatory survey for the expert consensus meeting on precision anatomy for minimally invasive HBP surgery[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2022,29(1):41-50.doi:10.1002/jhbp.959http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.959.
Chiba N,Shimazu M,Ochiai S,et al.Handling of hilar vasculature in living donor right hepatectomy using extrahepatic glissonean approach[J].Dig Surg,2022,39(1):1-5.doi:10.1159/000521240http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000521240.
谭志国,朱岱阳,孙增鹏,等.右肝蒂Glisson鞘外阻断在腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用初探[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2020,32(8):449-452.doi:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2020.08.001http://dx.doi.org/10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2020.08.001.
肖永刚,张吉祥,王黎明,等.基于右前肝蒂、右后肝蒂和肝右静脉之间类三角区域的Glisson蒂入路在腹腔镜解剖性右侧肝段切除术中的应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2022,28(8):592-596.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20220330-00137http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20220330-00137.
Campos C,Turck P,Tavares AMV,et al.Effects of copaiba oil in peripheral markers of oxidative stress in a model of cor pulmonale in rats[J].Arq Bras Cardiol,2021,117(6):1106-1112.doi:10.36660/abc.20200929http://dx.doi.org/10.36660/abc.20200929.
Özer Ö,Topal U,Şen M.The effects of specific and non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors and N-acetylcysteine on oxidative stress and remote organ injury in two-hit trauma model[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2020,26(4):517-525.doi:10.14744/tjtes. 2019. 00570http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.00570.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621