
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院麻醉学与疼痛医学科/老年麻醉与围术期脑健康湖北省重点实验室/武汉市老年麻醉临床医学研究中心,湖北 武汉 430022
迟晓慧,E-mail:xh_chi@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-11-25,
收稿日期:2023-10-25,
移动端阅览
陈红,廖明锋,李世勇等.领结征髂筋膜阻滞的髋关节置换术中舒芬太尼不同剂量预测模型的效果[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(11):949-954.
CHEN Hong,LIAO Ming-feng,LI Shi-yong,et al.Effects of different dose prediction models of sufentanil during hip arthroplasty with bow tie fascia iliac block[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(11):949-954.
陈红,廖明锋,李世勇等.领结征髂筋膜阻滞的髋关节置换术中舒芬太尼不同剂量预测模型的效果[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(11):949-954. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.10E023110.
CHEN Hong,LIAO Ming-feng,LI Shi-yong,et al.Effects of different dose prediction models of sufentanil during hip arthroplasty with bow tie fascia iliac block[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(11):949-954. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.10E023110.
目的
2
比较行超声引导下领结征髂筋膜阻滞的老年髋关节置换术中舒芬太尼不同剂量预测模型的效果。
方法
2
选择2018年6月至2022年6月于本院行超声引导下领结征髂筋膜阻滞的老年髋关节置换术患者90例为研究对象。采用一元线性回归方程模型(ALR)、多元线性回归方程模型(MLR)或人工神经网络模型(DBN)确定舒芬太尼剂量,患者按单盲法随机分为ALR组、MLR组和DBN组,每组30例。比较各组患者镇痛效果、血流动力学指标、炎症因子水平、手术指标。采用
Kaplan
-
Meier
法分析各组患者术后2周髋部感染发生情况。
结果
2
各组患者性别、年龄、体质量、美国麻醉医师协会分级和合并症情况比较差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。DBN组患者术后24 h的Harris评分、感觉阻滞持续时间高/长于ALR组,术后24 h疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)、手术开始时和手术开始后30 min的平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR)、术后24 h白细胞介素-17(IL-17)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)水平、感觉阻滞起效时间、患者自控镇痛(PCA)按压次数低/早/少于ALR组,术后24 h的改良警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)显著低于ALR组和MLR组,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。MLR组患者术后24 h的Harris评分、感觉阻滞持续时间高/长于ALR组,术后12 h的改良OAA/S评分、手术开始后30 min的MAP、术后24 h IL-17和TNF-α水平、感觉阻滞起效时间、PCA按压次数低/长/少于ALR组,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
Kaplan
-
Meier
分析结果显示,各组患者术后2周髋部感染发生率比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);ALR组和DBN组患者术后2周髋部感染发生率比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
在领结征髂筋膜阻滞老年髋关节置换术中使用MLR和DBN计算舒芬太尼剂量的有效性优于ALR,且DBN优势更明显。
Objective
2
To compare the effects of different dose prediction models of sufentanil in elderly hip arthroplasty with ultrasound-guided bow tie fascia iliac block.
Methods
2
A total of 90 elderly patients who underwent ultrasound-guided bow tie fascia iliac during hip arthroplasty in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2022 were selected.The dose of sufentanil was determined by a linear regression (ALR), multiple linear regression (MLR) or deep belief networks (DBN). Patients were randomly divided into the ALR group, the MLR group and the DBN group, with 30 cases in each group. The analgesic effect, hemodynamic index, inflammatory factor level and surgical index were compared among all groups.
Kaplan-Meier
method was used to analyze the incidence of hip infection 2 weeks after surgery in each group.
Results
2
There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification or complications among all groups (
P
>
0.05). The Harris score 24 hours after surgery and duration of sensory block in the DBN group were higher/longer than those in the ALR group, numerical rating scale (NRS) score 24 hours after surgery, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at the beginning of surgery and 30 minutes after surgery, levels of interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) 24 hours after surgery, onset time of sensory block, and number of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) compression were lower/earlier/less than those in the ALR group, the modified observer´s assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) score 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower than those in the ALR group and the MLR group, with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05). Harris score 24 hours after surgery and duration of sensory block in the MLR group were higher/longer than those in the ALR group, modified OAA/S score 12 hours after surgery, MAP 30 minutes after surgery, levels of IL-17 and TNF-α 24 hours after surgery, onset time of sensory block, and the number of PCA compressions were lower/longer/less than those in the ALR group, with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05).
Kaplan
-
Meier
analysis showed that there were significant differences in the incidences of hip infection 2 weeks after surgery among all groups (
P
<
0.05), and there were significant differences in the incidences of hip infection 2 weeks after surgery between the ALR group and the DBN group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The effectiveness of calculating the dose of sufentanil using the MLR and DBN in elderly hip arthroplasty with bow tie fascia iliac block is better than that of ALR, and the advantage of DBN is more obvious.
预测模型领结征髂筋膜阻滞髋关节置换术舒芬太尼超声
prediction modelbow tie fascia iliac blockhip arthroplastysufentanilultrasound
周润芳, 傅洪, 薛张纲, 等. 肝硬化失代偿超高龄患者右半髋关节置换术的麻醉与围术期管理[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2021, 41(5): 516-518. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20210414.00502http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20210414.00502.
王标, 王雷原, 纪木火. 老年患者髋关节置换术后谵妄的危险因素[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(7): 688-692. doi:10.12089/jca.2022.07.003http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2022.07.003.
Karsten K, Lukas H, Stefano B, et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized for hip joint replacement surgery[J]. Thromb Res, 2020, 190(3): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.03.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.03.019.
郑煜丽, 高晓曼, 李咸鹏, 等. 超声引导下髂腰肌平面阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞在髋关节置换围术期镇痛效果的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(4): 346-350. doi: 10.12089/jca.2023.04.002http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2023.04.002.
单玉兰, 周晓林, 徐小青. 超声引导髂筋膜阻滞与股神经阻滞治疗全膝关节置换后疼痛的疗效比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29(12):1244-1248.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2020.12.015http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2020.12.015.
胡婕,汪欢,陈士寿,等.超声引导下“领结征”髂筋膜联合骶丛神经阻滞应用于人工髋关节置换术的效果[J].实用医学杂志,2021,37(6):763-767.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021. 06.015http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.06.015.
邓红波, 封享兰, 张宗泽, 等. 舒芬太尼或羟考酮自控静脉镇痛联合腰方肌阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(2): 124-127. doi: 10.12089/jca.2020.02.004http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2020.02.004.
王园,李勇,崔爱武,等.低剂量右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼对老年髋部骨折手术患者术后疼痛应激及认知损伤的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2021,41(4):790-793.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202. 2021.04.037http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.04.037.
侯艳华, 张加强, 武江霞. CYP3A41G不同基因型对髋关节置换术后地佐辛复合舒芬太尼自控镇痛效应的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(3): 239-243. doi: 10.12089/jca.2020.03.006http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2020.03.006.
石军, 刘明红, 薛敏, 等. 舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛联合前路腰方肌阻滞对老年全髋关节置换患者术后镇痛和术后谵妄的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2020,36(3):334-338.doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-5725.2020.03.012http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.03.012.
Taylor G,Oresanya L,Kling S,et al.Rethinking the routine: preoperative laboratory testing among American society of anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery in the 2017 national surgical quality improvement program cohort[J].Surgery,2022,171(2):267-274.doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.036http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.036.
丁声双,张杰,黄伟华,等.髋关节囊周围神经阻滞对全髋关节置换患者围术期镇痛疗效的meta分析[J].重庆医学,2023,52(7): 1052-1056. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.07.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.07.019.
Micu M,Micu A,Bolboac S.AB0873 ultrasound guided intra-articular injection with hyaluronic acid agents in moderate hip osteoarthritis[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2020,79(1):1742-1743.doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1619http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1619.
潘敏, 蒋轶岭, 夏瑜秦, 等. 芬太尼和舒芬太尼对肝癌患者射频消融术后肝功能的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(1): 54-58. doi: 10.12089/jca.2023.01.011http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2023.01.011.
Fröschen FS, Schell S, Schildberg FA, et al. Analysis of synovial biomarkers with a multiplex protein microarray in patients with PJI undergoing revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee joint[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020, 140(12): 1883-1890. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03388-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03388-5.
Tong SX, Li RS, Wang D, et al. Artificial intelligence technology and ultrasound-guided nerve block for analgesia in total knee arthroplasty[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(29): 7026-7033. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.7026http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.7026.
罗铁山, 黄建成, 赵涛, 等.不同剂量右美托咪定用于罗哌卡因复合利多卡因臂丛神经阻滞的效果观察[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(14): 2463-2468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.14.027http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.14.027.
董晓西, 厉永亮, 赵敏, 等. 不同脉冲间隔时间程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入模式对分娩镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(10): 1031-1035. doi: 10.12089/jca.2022.10.004http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2022.10.004.
Lim H, Kim B, Noh GJ, et al. A deep neural network-based pain classifier using a photoplethysmography signal[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2019, 19(2): 384-400. doi: 10.3390/s19020384http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19020384.
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621