
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
山西白求恩医院放射科,山西 太原 030032
孙海平,E-mail:pingeraaaaa_ok@126.com
纸质出版日期:2023-05-25,
收稿日期:2022-10-21,
扫 描 看 全 文
孙海平,孙栋.骨质疏松性腰椎压缩性骨折的椎间盘和椎旁肌肉MRI变化及意义[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(05):424-427.
SUN Hai-ping,SUN Dong.MRI changes of intervertebral disc and paravertebral muscle in osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture and its significance[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(05):424-427.
孙海平,孙栋.骨质疏松性腰椎压缩性骨折的椎间盘和椎旁肌肉MRI变化及意义[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(05):424-427. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.10E022119.
SUN Hai-ping,SUN Dong.MRI changes of intervertebral disc and paravertebral muscle in osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture and its significance[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2023,32(05):424-427. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.10E022119.
目的
2
研究骨质疏松性腰椎压缩性骨折的椎间盘、椎旁肌肉磁共振成像(MRI)变化及意义。
方法
2
回顾性分析我院85例腰椎压缩性骨折患者的临床资料,将45例存在骨质疏松的患者纳入观察组,40例无骨质疏松的患者纳入对照组。比较2组患者的Pfirrmann分级、L
1
~L
5
椎旁肌肉的相关指标,包括双侧多裂肌横截面积、双侧竖脊肌横截面积、椎体横截面积、脂肪变性比例。
结果
2
2组Pfirrmann 分级比较,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。对照组L
1
~L
5
双侧多裂肌横截面积、双侧竖脊肌横截面积显著大于观察组,L
1
~L
5
脂肪变性比例显著低于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);2组L
1
~L
5
椎体横截面积比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
骨质疏松性腰椎压缩性骨折患者的腰椎间盘退变程度明显高于单纯腰椎压缩性骨折患者,其椎旁肌肉MRI变化主要表现为双侧多裂肌、竖脊肌横截面积减小和脂肪变性比例升高。
Objective
2
To study the changes and significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of intervertebral disc and paravertebral muscle in osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture.
Methods
2
The clinical data of 85 patients with lumbar compression fracture in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed.A total of 45 patients combined with osteoporosis were included in the observation group
and 40 patients without osteoporosis were included in the control group.The Pfirrmann grading and related indexes of paravertebral muscles from L
1
to L
5
including cross-sectional area of bilateral multifidus muscle
cross-sectional area of bilateral erector spinae
cross-sectional area of vertebral body and steatosis ratio were compared between the two groups.
Results
2
There was significant difference in the Pfirrmann grading between the two groups (
P
<
0.05).The cross-sectional areas of bilateral multifidus muscle and bilateral erector spinae from L
1
to L
5
in the control group were significantly greater than those in the observation group
and the steatosis ratios from L
1
to L
5
were significantly lower than those in the observation group
with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05).There was no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of vertebral bodies from L
1
to L
5
between the two groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with patients with simple lumbar compression fracture
patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture have significantly higher degenerative degree of lumbar intervertebral disc
whose MRI changes of paraspinal muscles are mainly manifested as the decrease of cross-sectional areas of bilateral multifidus muscle and bilateral erector spinae and the increase of steatosis ratio.
骨质疏松腰椎压缩性骨折椎旁肌肉Pfirrmann分级MRI非对称回波最小二乘估算法迭代水脂分离序列
osteoporosislumbar vertebral compression fractureparaspinal musclesPfirrmann gradingMRIIDEAL-IQ
刘斌,刘向阳,王国平,等.腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者椎旁肌肉MRI指标测量及临床意义[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(4):578-583.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1040http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1040.
Marques JP,Simonis FFJ,Webb AG.Low-field MRI:an MR physics perspective[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2019,49(6):1528-1542.doi:10.1002/jmri.26637http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26637.
顾军,孙小明,陈海军,等.SPECT-CT、MRI诊断骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折疼痛责任椎体的准确性比较[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2021,19(1):169-171.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2021.01.058http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2021.01.058.
肖运祥,陈海丹,刘杨.胸腰椎压缩性骨折椎间盘形态学观察及临床意义[J].中国医师进修杂志,2017,40(1):53-55.doi:10.3760/cma.j.jssn.1673-4904.2017.01.015http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.jssn.1673-4904.2017.01.015.
王海姣,倪水军,徐亦生.X线、CT和MRI多模态影像对溶骨性转移瘤和骨质疏松致椎体压缩性骨折的诊断价值分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2022,45(11):997-1003.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20220111-00023http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20220111-00023.
Gao F,Liu S,Zhang X,et al.Automated grading of lumbar disc degeneration using a push-pull regularization network based on MRI[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2021,53(3):799-806.doi:10.1002/jmri.27400http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27400.
程晓光,王亮,曾强,等.中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2019,25(6):733-737.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2019.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2019.06.001.
王孝林,权正学,王南,等.网袋加压椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(9):822-826.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2017.09.017http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2017.09.017.
Hoppe S,Maurer D,Valenzuela W,et al.3D analysis of fatty infiltration of the paravertebral lumbar muscles using T2 images-a new approach[J].Eur Spine J,2021,30(9):2570-2576.doi:10.1007/s00586-021-06810-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06810-7.
Sneath RJS,Khan A,Hutchinson C.An objective assessment of lumbar spine degeneration/ageing seen on MRI using an ensemble method:a novel approach to lumbar MRI reporting[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2022,47(5):187-195.doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004159http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004159.
陈娇,张义.双能量计算机断层扫描检查对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者的临床应用价值[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2020,12(5):136-140.doi:10.12037/YXQY.2020.05-25http://dx.doi.org/10.12037/YXQY.2020.05-25.
邬晓勇,毕文志,崔翔,等.骨质疏松与恶性肿瘤转移致椎体压缩性骨折MRI,CT影像学特点及鉴别诊断[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(10):727-732.doi:10.3969j.issn.1009-4237.2020. 10.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3969j.issn.1009-4237.2020.10.002.
Jones J,Harrison C,Harbold A,et al.Open-source image analysis software yields reproducible MRI measures of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in sheep models[J].Vet Radiol Ultrasound,2021,62(5):568-572.doi:10.1111/vru.12977http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vru.12977.
李孟磊,葛英霖,韩海林.骨质疏松与溶骨性转移瘤致椎体压缩骨折的多模态影像应用研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2020,36(1):95-98.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2020.01.024http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2020.01.024.
何涛,张郡,刘钦毅.老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的精准诊断和微创介入治疗进展[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2020,46(3):655-661.doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20200337http://dx.doi.org/10.13481/j.1671-587x.20200337.
Urrutia J,Besa P,Lobos D,et al.Is a single-level measurement of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration and cross-sectional area representative of the entire lumbar spine?[J].Skeletal Radiology,2018,47(7):939-945.doi:10.1007/s00256-018-2902-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2902-z.
陈文,葛永丽,周植森,等.对比X线、CT、MRI用于临床评估症状性骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折疗效的价值[J].中国伤残医学,2020,28(8):28-29.doi:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2020.08.016http://dx.doi.org/10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2020.08.016.
Lohr C,Braumann KM,Reer R,et al.Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers[J].Eur J Appl Physiol,2018,118(7):1349-1359.doi:10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2.
吴春彪,潘晓瑾,郭文龙.MRI对于骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的诊断价值[J].影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(2):203-204.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.02.099http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.02.099.
孙文路,刘姣姣,郭兴满,等.核磁共振脂肪量化预测骨质疏松椎体骨折的意义[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(10):870-874.doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2021.10.02http://dx.doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2021.10.02.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621