
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
佛山市中医院关节中心骨十科,广东 佛山 528000
周观明,E-mail:zhouguanming1970@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-25,
收稿日期:2023-06-12,
移动端阅览
陈希聪,蔡剑,曾会粮等.机器人导航辅助下股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的随机对照研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(09):768-772.
CHEN Xi-cong,CAI Jian,ZENG Hui-liang,et al.Randomized controlled study on treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur with proximal femoral nail antirotation assisted by robot navigation[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(09):768-772.
陈希聪,蔡剑,曾会粮等.机器人导航辅助下股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的随机对照研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(09):768-772. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.06E023072.
CHEN Xi-cong,CAI Jian,ZENG Hui-liang,et al.Randomized controlled study on treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur with proximal femoral nail antirotation assisted by robot navigation[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(09):768-772. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.06E023072.
目的
2
探讨机器人导航辅助下股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)与C型臂X射线机透视下PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折(IFOF)的疗效。
方法
2
选择我院单侧IFOF患者100例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(50例)和机器人辅助组(50例),对照组在C型臂X射线机透视下行PFNA内固定治疗,机器人辅助组在机器人导航辅助下行PFNA内固定治疗。比较2患者组手术指标、骨折复位及骨折愈合情况、应激反应指标、髋关节功能、生活质量评分以及手术相关并发症发生率。
结果
2
机器人辅助组患者手术时间、总透视时间、置钉时间、骨折愈合时间短于对照组(
P
<
0.05),术中出血量、导针调整次数、透视次数少于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。机器人辅助组患者骨折复位情况、骨折愈合情况均优于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。术后2 d,2组患者血清去甲肾上腺素(NE)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(Ang Ⅱ)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平均高于术前(
P
<
0.05);机器人辅助组术后2 d血清NE、Ang II、SOD水平均低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。2组患者术后7 d、术后3个月Harris评分及健康状况调查量表(SF-36)评分高于术前(
P
<
0.05),且术后3个月上述评分高于术后7 d(
P
<
0.05);术后7 d、术后3个月,机器人辅助组患者Harris评分、SF-36评分均高于对照组(
P<
0.05)。机器人辅助组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
与C型臂X射线机透视相比,机器人导航辅助下PFNA治疗IFOF能进一步缩短手术时间、减小手术创伤及降低并发症发生率,骨折复位、愈合效果更佳,机体应激更小,更能改善患者髋关节功能及生活质量。
Objective
2
To investigate the therapeutic effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) assisted by robot navigation and PFNA guided by C-arm X-ray machine for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFOF).
Methods
2
The 100 patients with unilateral IFOF in our hospital were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into the control group (50 cases) and the robot-assisted group (50 cases) according to random number table method.The control group was treated with PFNA internal fixation under C-arm X-ray machine fluoroscopy,and the robot-assisted group was treated with PFNA internal fixation assisted by robot navigation.Surgical indicators,fracture reduction and fracture healing,stress response indexes,hip joint function,quality of life score and incidence of surgery related complications were compared between the two groups.
Results
2
The operation time,total fluoroscopy time,nail placement time and fracture healing time of the robot-assisted group were shorter than those of the control group (
P
<
0.05); and the intraoperative blood loss,guide needle adjustment frequency,and fluoroscopy frequency of the robot-assisted group were less than those of the control group (
P
<
0.05).The fracture reduction and fracture healing in the robot-assisted group were better than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05).Two days after operation,the levels of serum norepinephrine (NE),angiotensin II (Ang II) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the two groups were higher than those before operation (
P
<
0.05),and the levels of serum NE,Ang II and SOD in the robot-assisted group were lower than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05).The Harris score and 36-item short-form (SF-36) score of patients 7 days and 3 months after surgery in the two groups were higher than those before surgery (
P
<
0.05),and the above scores 3 months after surgery were higher than those 7 days after surgery (
P
<
0.05).Harris score and SF-36 score 7 days and 3 months after operation in the robot-assisted group were higher than those in the control g
roup (
P
<
0.05).The incidence of complications in the robot-assisted group was lower than that in the control group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with the C-arm X-ray machine fluoroscopy, the treatment of IFOF with PFNA assisted by robot navigation can further shorten the operation time,reduce the surgical trauma and the incidence of complications,achieve better effect of fracture reduction and healing,reduce stress response of the body,and improve hip joint function and quality of life for patients.
股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉机器人导航辅助应激反应髋关节功能生活质量
intertrochanteric fracture of femurproximal femoral nail antirotationrobot navigation assistancestress responsehip joint functionquality of life
Polat G, Bayram S, Gökçeoğlu YS,et al. The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 year[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2022,28(12):1731-1738. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400.
马超,宋矿朋,刘向林.经皮骨钩股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效及安全性[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(7):625-628.doi:10.11659/jjssx.03E023026http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.03E023026.
宋矿朋,刘向林,马超. INTER-tan与PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 重庆医学,2021,50(14):2485-2488. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.14.032http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.14.032.
黄复铭,张信哲,李伟雄,等.机器人辅助导航与徒手经皮空心螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2023,25(11):979-985.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20230524-00259http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20230524-00259.
张朕,刘华水,段升军,等.机器人辅助PFNA与传统手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,6(1):25-30.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.01.006http://dx.doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.01.006.
邓杰林,倪进荣,王海虎,等.多学科协同在老年股骨粗隆间骨折诊治中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(10):1061-1063.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2021.10.016http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2021.10.016.
曹良佐,杨荣. 数字化三维测量辅助闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(12):1285-1286. doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2020.12.018http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2020.12.018.
蒿俊行,董金辉,甄红军,等.股骨粗隆间骨折内侧皮质复位状态对骨折预后的影响[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(6):21-24.
Phruetthiphat OA,Pinijprapa P,Satravaha Y,et al.An innovative scoring system for predicting an excellent Harris hip score after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J].Sci Rep,2022,12(1):19939.doi:10.1038/s41598-022-24177-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24177-7.
Abbasi-Ghahramanloo A,Soltani-Kermanshahi M,Mansori K,et al.Comparison of SF-36 and WHOQoL-BREF in measuring quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes[J].Int J Gen Med,2020,11(13):497-506.doi:10.2147/IJGM.S258953http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S258953.
Benech CA,Perez R,Benech F,et al.Navigated robotic assistance results in improved screw accuracy and positive clinical outcomes:an evaluation of the first 54 cases[J].J Robot Surg,2020,14(3):431-437.doi:10.1007/s11701-019-01007-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01007-z.
杨成志,黄站珠,唐经励,等.骨科手术机器人与“O”型臂X线导航辅助骨盆骨折经皮内固定术的比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2021,41(19):1387-1395.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210101-00001http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210101-00001.
赵春鹏,王豫,孙旭,等.智能化骨折复位机器人系统辅助骨盆骨折微创复位的解剖学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2022,24(5):372-379.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20220220-00100http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20220220-00100.
李琦,贾宇,李一汉,等.老年股骨转子间骨折患者PFNA内固定的手术时机探讨及术后髋关节功能恢复的影响因素分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(16):3046-3050.doi:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.16.010http://dx.doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.16.010.
陈琛,许安平,凌炜,等.PFNA与加长PFNA内固定术在伴骨质疏松症不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折治疗中的应用效果比较[J].山东医药,2022,62(5):74-77.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X. 2022.05.018http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2022.05.018.
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621