
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
江苏大学附属昆山医院创伤骨科,江苏 昆山 215300
陆向荣,E-mail:teytha71461@21cn.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-25,
收稿日期:2023-05-12,
移动端阅览
陆向荣,陆大明,蒋梁华等.不同内固定系统在老年肱骨外科颈骨折中的应用对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(09):764-767.
LU Xiang-rong,LU Da-ming,JIANG Liang-hua,et al.Comparison of different internal fixation systems in geriatric humerus surgical neck fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(09):764-767.
陆向荣,陆大明,蒋梁华等.不同内固定系统在老年肱骨外科颈骨折中的应用对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(09):764-767. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E023061.
LU Xiang-rong,LU Da-ming,JIANG Liang-hua,et al.Comparison of different internal fixation systems in geriatric humerus surgical neck fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(09):764-767. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E023061.
目的
2
对比分析桥接组合式内固定系统(OBS)与肱骨近端内锁定系统(PHILOS)治疗老年肱骨外科颈骨折(HSNF)的临床效果。
方法
2
回顾性分析我院收治的80例老年HSNF患者的临床资料,根据手术方法不同将患者分为2组,其中30例采用OBS治疗的患者纳入OBS组,50例采用PHILOS治疗的患者纳入PHILOS组。比较2组患者手术情况、术后康复情况、血清骨代谢指标[骨钙素(OCN)、Ⅰ型前胶原氨基端前肽(PINP)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)]水平、骨痂评分、肩关节功能评分[Constant-Murley量表(CMS)评分、Neer评分]、并发症发生率。
结果
2
OBS组患者手术时间长于PHILOS组,骨折愈合时间短于PHILOS组(
P
<
0.05);OBS组患者术后1个月、3个月血清OCN、PINP、ALP水平高于PHILOS组(
P
<
0.05);OBS组患者术后1个月、2个月、3个月骨痂评分高于PHILOS组(
P
<
0.05);OBS组患者术后1个月、3个月CMS、Neer评分高于PHILOS组(
P
<
0.05);2组患者术后切口恢复良好,均为Ⅰ级愈合,无伤口感染、骨不连等并发症发生。
结论
2
与PHILOS比较,应用OBS治疗老年HSNF患者的近期临床效果更佳,且能促进骨折愈合。
Objective
2
To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of the ortho-bridge system (OBS) and the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of humeral surgical neck fractures (HSNF) in the elderly.
Methods
2
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 80 elderly patients with HSNF admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into the two groups based on different surgical methods, among which 30 patients treated with OBS were included into the OBS group and 50 patients treated with PHILOS were included into the PHILOS group. The operation indicators, postoperative recovery indicators, serum bone metabolism indexes [osteocalcin (OCN), N-terminal propeptide of type Ⅰ precollagen (PINP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)], callus score, shoulder joint function scores [Constant-Murley scale (CMS) score and Neer score], and incidence of complications of the two groups were compared.
Results
2
The operation time in the OBS group was longer than that in the PHILOS group, and the fracture healing time was shorter than that in the PHILOS group (
P
<
0.05). The levels of serum OCN, PINP, and ALP 1 month and 3 months after surgery in the OBS group were higher than those in the PHILOS group (
P
<
0.05). The callus scores 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after surgery in the OBS group were higher than those in the PHILOS group (
P
<
0.05). The CMS and Neer scores 1 month and 3 months after surgery in the OBS group were higher than those in the PHILOS group (
P
<
0.05). The incisions of patients in the two groups recovered well after surgery, achieving grade Ⅰ healing without complications such as wound infection or nonunion.
Conclusion
2
Compared with PHILOS, the application of OBS in the treatment of elderly patients with HSNF has a better short-term clinical outcome, and can promote fracture healing.
肱骨外科颈骨折桥接组合式内固定系统肱骨近端内锁定系统肩关节功能安全性
humerus surgical neck fracturesortho-bridge systemproximal humerus internal locking systemshoulder functionsafety
Huang H.Treatment of the surgical neck fracture of the humerus with a novel external fixator in the elderly with osteoporosis: biomechanical analysis[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019,20(1):218.doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2599-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2599-8.
孙维忆,张宁,周亚莉,等.2010年至2019年河北医科大学第三医院老年肱骨外科颈骨折临床特征的变化趋势分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(4):337-342.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210114-00022http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210114-00022.
陈锐鸿,葛鸿庆,管华,等.Multiloc髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨外科颈骨折的临床研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2019,25(4):297-300.doi:10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2019.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2019.04.003.
Borer J,Schwarz J,Potthast S,et al.Mid-term results of minimally invasive deltoid-split versus standard open deltopectoral approach for PHILOS™ (proximal humeral internal locking system) osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2020,46(4):825-834.doi:10.1007/s00068-019-01076-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01076-7.
Zhao L,Qi YM,Yang L,et al.Comparison of the effects of proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) alone and PHILOS combined with fibular allograft in the treatment of Neer three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly[J].Orthop Surg,2019,11(6):1003-1012.doi:10.1111/os.12564http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12564.
朱贤久.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗四肢长骨多段长段骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,22(1):118.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287. 2019.01.047http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2019.01.047.
Chelli M,Gasbarro G,Lavoué V,et al.The reliability of the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures: a survey of orthopedic shoulder surgeons[J].JSES Int,2022,6(3):331-337.doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.006.
Small LT,Lampkin M,Vural E,et al.American society of anesthesiologists class as predictor for perioperative morbidity in head and neck free flaps[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2019,161(1):91-97.doi:10.1177/0194599819832812http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599819832812.
张宏斌,刘亦凯,关鹏飞,等.弹簧钩钢板与传统钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性踝关节骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(4):427-429.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2022.04.027http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2022.04.027.
田子睿,姚敏,王拥军,等.中文版Constant-Murley肩关节评分量表的研制与应用[J].中医正骨,2019,31(5):20-21.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2019.05.005http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2019.05.005.
程刚,王志刚,戎祖华.肱骨近端骨折闭合复位髓内钉内固定术后Neer肩关节功能评分影响因素分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(5):510-513.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935. 2021.05.022http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2021.05.022.
金万通,刘兵,纪振钢,等.Multiloc髓内钉与Philos锁定钢板治疗老年Neer二、三部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2022,31(3):202-206.doi:10.11659/jjssx.08E021146http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.08E021146.
Cai P,Yang Y,Xu Z,et al.Anatomic locking plates for complex proximal humeral fractures: anatomic neck fractures versus surgical neck fractures[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2019,28(3):476-482.doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.012.
熊鹰,陆继鹏,王大兴,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗肱骨及胫骨骨折的临床应用研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(14):1209-1211.
杨俊宇,段洪,陶金国,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2019,16(1):48-51.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2019.01.011http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2019.01.011.
Long Y,Qi Y,Zuo G,et al.Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the ortho-bridge system: a biomechanical study[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2022,17(1):301.doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03154-whttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03154-w.
王文,龙运涛,左贵来,等.桥接组合式内固定系统与钢板固定股骨假体周围Vancouver B1型骨折的生物力学研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(1):47-53.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210506-00340http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210506-00340.
任东,邢丹谋,张明,等.桥接组合内固定系统与锁定钉板系统治疗闭合性肱骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(3):156-163.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20211018-00600http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20211018-00600.
张勇,郭维忠,张媛,等.改良后入路MIPPO肱骨远端锁定钢板治疗肱骨下段骨折的疗效及对骨代谢的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(8):1596-1600.doi:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb. 2020.08.044http://dx.doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2020.08.044.
Guo RF,Zheng J.Effect of minimally invasive anterior lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty on serum type I collagen propeptide, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b and hip joint function in patients with femoral neck fracture[J].Chin J Orthop Traumat,2019,32(12):1117-1122.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.12.010http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.12.010.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621