
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
华北医疗健康集团峰峰总医院邯郸院区骨科,河北 邯郸 056001
刘晓宁,E-mail:xiaoningliu668@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-03-25,
收稿日期:2023-03-20,
扫 描 看 全 文
赵凌燕,赵洪波,杨东海等.不同体位股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(03):239-242.
ZHAO Ling-yan,ZHAO Hong-bo,YANG Dong-hai,et al.Efficacies of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation in different body positions on elderly unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(03):239-242.
赵凌燕,赵洪波,杨东海等.不同体位股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J].局解手术学杂志,2024,33(03):239-242. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.03E023124.
ZHAO Ling-yan,ZHAO Hong-bo,YANG Dong-hai,et al.Efficacies of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation in different body positions on elderly unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2024,33(03):239-242. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.03E023124.
目的
2
探讨牵引床仰卧位及非牵引床侧卧位下行股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。
方法
2
回顾性分析我院采用PFNA内固定治疗的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,将在牵引床仰卧位下治疗的41例患者纳入仰卧位组,将采取非牵引床侧卧位治疗的55例患者纳入侧卧位组。分析2组患者围术期相关指标情况、手术复位情况、髋关节Harris评分及并发症发生情况。
结果
2
侧卧位组患者手术时间、切口长度短于仰卧位组,术中出血量、透视次数少于仰卧位组,差异有统计学意义(
P<
0.05)。2组患者麻醉方式、输血情况、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(
P>
0.05)。2组患者术后并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(
P>
0.05)。2组患者颈干角、尖顶距、髋关节Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(
P>
0.05)。
结论
2
牵引床仰卧位及非牵引床侧卧位下行PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨不稳定型粗隆间骨折的疗效相当,但非牵引床侧卧位在缩短手术时间、降低术中出血量、减少放射暴露方面更具优势。
Objective
2
To investigate the efficacies of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) internal fixation in traction bed supine position and non-traction bed lateral position in the treatment of elderly unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
Methods
2
The clinical data of patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA internal fixation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, 41 patients received treatment in traction bed supine position were included in the supine position group, and 55 patients treated received treatment in non-traction bed lateral position were included in the lateral position group. The perioperative related indicators, surgical reduction, hip Harris score, and incidence of complications in the two groups were analyzed.
Results
2
The operation time and incision length of patients in the lateral position group were shorter than those in the supine position group, and the intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times were less than those in the supine position group, with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05). There was no significant difference in the anesthesia mode, blood transfusion or hospital stay of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). There was no significant difference in neck-shaft angle, tip-apex distance or hip Harris score of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
PFNA internal fixation in traction bed supine position and non-traction bed lateral position have the same effect in the treatment of elderly unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures, while the non-traction bed lateral position for treatment has more advantages in shortening operation time, decreasing intraoperative blood loss, and reducing radiation exposure.
股骨粗隆间骨折内固定股骨近端防旋髓内钉侧卧位仰卧位
femoral intertrochanteric fracturesinternal fixationproximal femoral nail anti-rotationlateral positionsupine position
梁爱军,李佳怡,黄辰宇,等.三维可视化辅助股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折[J].局解手术学杂志,2017,26(10):759-763.doi:10.11659/jjssx.05E017095http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.05E017095.
刘振刚,杨超,施建东,等.人工股骨头置换术与髓内钉内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(2):158-160.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2021.02.014http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2021.02.014.
付素娟,王保同,张夏,等.不同体位PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J].海南医学,2018,29(11):1586-1588.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2018.11.032http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2018.11.032.
银晓永,王浩军,席树强,等.不同体位下PFNA治疗老年煤矿工人股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2019,16(3):51-53.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2019.03.011http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2019.03.011.
陈杨达豪,黄余亮.股骨粗隆间骨折治疗研究进展[J].浙江临床医学,2020,22(2):294-296.
曾文磊,冯兴伦,杜绍龙,等.高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA手术与保守治疗的临床疗效对比[J].中国伤残医学,2020,28(14):3-4.doi:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2020.14.002http://dx.doi.org/10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2020.14.002.
Yeganeh A,Taghavi R,Moghtadaei M.Comparing the intramedullary nailing method versus dynamic hip screw in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures[J].Med Arch,2016,70(1):53-56.doi:10.5455/medarh.2016.70.53-56http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.53-56.
Caruso G,Corradi N,Caldaria A,et al.New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures[J].Sci Rep,2022,12(1):357.doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1.
蒋臻,郑明军,赵小波,等.不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA-Ⅱ术后效果的影响因素分析[J].中华全科医学,2021,19(12):2016-2019.doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002224http://dx.doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002224.
陈家富,胡继功,洪登北,等.不同体位PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的疗效[J].安徽医学,2021,42(4):426-428.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.04.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.04.019.
柯威,旷瑜,闵竟,等.不同手术体位在治疗老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折中临床疗效研究[J].创伤与急危重病医学,2021,9(1):56-59.doi:10.16048/j.issn.2095-5561.2021.01.14http://dx.doi.org/10.16048/j.issn.2095-5561.2021.01.14.
邓建海,张莉,宋晓玺,等.不同牵引复位在老年股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA内固定术中应用的效果观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(4):65-66.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018. 04.021http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2018.04.021.
罗永鑫,陈敬忠,余华伟,等.不同体位下PFNA治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(2):154-157.
银晓永,吴希瑞,刘晓宁,等.老年煤矿工人骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA内固定术后早期疗效影响因素分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(12):1250-1253.doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2016.12.006http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2016.12.006.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621