Comparative study of PBL and LBL in medical imaging practice teaching[J]. 2013,12(9):933-936.DOI:
PBL与LBL在医学影像学实习教学中的对比研究
摘要
目的 探讨以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning, PBL)、基于课堂的学习(lecture-based learning,LBL)教学在医学影像学教学中的应用。 方法 将2007级临床医学五年制学生124人分2组进行PBL教学(57人)及LBL教学(67人)。PBL组通过分组-给出病例-提出问题-建立假设-收集资料-论证假设-小组总结6个阶段教学。LBL组以教师为授课主体,利用多媒体、课件、挂图、模型、标本等进行课堂讲授,最后由教师进行总结。最后通过读片测验、闭卷考试及问卷调查进行效果评价。统计数据行t检验,以P≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 PBL组考试读片成绩[(82.4±14.8)分 vs (74.5±9.7)分]和病例分析成绩[(13.9±5.1)分 vs (10.2±6.1)分]高于LBL组(P≤0.05),调查发现PBL组学生认可PBL教学。结论 PBL教学有助于提高学生的临床分析能力,受到学生欢迎。其带来新的教学观念,能激发学生的学习兴趣,增强学生的创新意识,可作为传统教学的补充;Objective To investigate the application of PBL and LBL teaching in medical imag-ing teach-ing. Methods Totally 124 five-year clinical students were divided into two groups: PBL teaching (n=57) and LBL teaching(n=67). Teaching in PBL group was conducted through the following 6 proce-dures: grouping-giving cases-asking questions-establishing hypothesis-collecting data-hypoth-esis testing-team summarizing. Teaching in LBL group was conducted mainly by teachers with multime-dia, course-ware, wall charts, models, samples, etc and finally summarized by teachers. Effect was eval-uated by reading test, closed-book exam and questionnaire survey. t test was employed to do statically analysis, with P≤0.05 being statistical differences. Results Reading test score ((82.4±14.8) vs (74.5±9.7)) and case analysis score((13.9±5.1) vs (10.2±6.1)) were higher in PBL group than in LBL group(P≤0.05). Most students in PBL group appreciated the teaching method. Conclusions PBL teaching can help improve the clinical analysis of students and is welcomed by students. Moreover, PBL, as a supplement of traditional teaching, can initiate the learning interests and enhance the innova-tion of students.
Abstract
关键词
医学影像学 以问题为基础的学习 教学方法
Keywords
Medical imaging Problem-based learning Teaching method