
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
海南医学院
纸质出版日期:2017,
移动端阅览
蓝永洪, 崔志刚, 牛海艳, 等. “平均差值”法在学生自评与互评中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2017,16(7).
Application of mean difference method in students’ self- and peer-assessment[J]. 2017,16(7).
目的 探讨适合学生自评与互评中有效的评价方式。方法 选择参与课外教学活动的6组学生为研究对象,采用传统方法(最终得分=每组评分平均值/2+教师评分/2)和“平均差值”法[最终得分=教师评分-(每组平均差值-所有组平均差值)]计算每组的最终得分,比较两种方法的效果。结果 绝大部分的小组评分高于教师评分,其中第3组的自评和互评都是高评分。传统方法中所有小组的最终得分均高于教师评分,而“平均差值”法中,与教师评分相比,低于平均差值的第1、4、5组的最终得分明显增加,高于平均差值的第2、3组明显减少,与平均差值持平的第6组没有差异。结论 “平均差值”法能够真实反映学生自评与互评的效果,引导学生进行客观准确的评价,适合学生自评和互评,是一种比较合理科学的评价方式
Objective: To explore an effective evaluation method for students’ self- and peer-assessment. Methods: The students of 6 groups participated in extracurricular teaching activities were selected as research subject. Traditional method (final score = mean score of group/2 + teacher’s score/2) and mean difference method [final score = teacher’s score-(mean difference of group - mean difference of all groups)] were used to calculate final score of each group
and effect of two methods are compared. Results: Scores of most groups were higher than the teacher's scores
and high scores were given by group 3 in self- and peer-assessment. The final score of all groups were higher than teacher's scores in traditional method. Compared with teacher's scores
final scores increased significantly in group 1
4
5 below mean difference
final score decreased significantly in group 2
3 above mean difference
and final score did not differ in group 6 equal to mean difference in mean difference method. Conclusion: The mean difference method can reflect the effect of student's elf- and peer-assessment
and guide student to make objective and accurate evaluation. It is a more reasonable and scientific evaluation method for self- and peer-assessment.
平均差值自评与互评教师评价
Mean differenceSelf- and peer-assessmentTeacher assessment
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621