
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院烧伤整形美容外科
2. 口腔颌面外科
纸质出版日期:2011,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]宋鹏宇,薛斌,丁云鹏,杨佳.腹部术后切口愈合不良的3种不同方法疗效比较[J].重庆医科大学学报,2011,36(11):1400-1401.
SONG Peng-yu1, XUE Bin1, DING Yun-peng1, et al. Comparison of three different treatments for unhealing abdominal incisions[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2011,36(11):1400-1401.
目的:探讨3种不同方法治疗腹部手术切口愈合不良的临床疗效观察。方法:采用完全随机方法
将2005年12月至2010年12月手术后切口愈合不良的78例患者分为3组;A组采用负压封闭引流技术(Vacuum sealing drainage
VSD)治疗
B组采用常规换药联合局部喷洒重组牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子治疗(Recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor
rb-FGF);C组采用b-FGF联合VSD治疗。结果:A、B、C 3组切口创面均愈合
但切口愈合时间C组<B组<A组;住院时间及费用C组<B组<A组;P<0.05
均具有统计学意义。结论:采用b-FGF联合VSD治疗临床效果更好
值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective:To observe the clinical therapeutic effects of three different kinds of treatments on the healing after abdominal incision.Methods:A totally random method was taken.From December 2005 to December 2010
a total of 78 patients
whose incisions were not healing after operation
were randomly divided into three groups:Group A by treatment of vacuum sealing drainage.Group B by treatment of general dressing change and local spraying with recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor
and Group C by combined treatment of b-FGF and VSD.Results:Unhealed abdominal incision wounds in Groups A
B
and C healed finally.The wound healing time had statistical significance:Group C<Group B<Group A;so did hospital stay and the maintenance charge:Group C <Group B<Group A(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of the treatment with vacuum sealing drainage combine with recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor is a preferable method
and it deserves to be applied in clinical practice.
腹部手术切口愈合不良联合治疗
abdominal surgeryunhealing incisioncombined treatment
0
浏览量
92
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621