
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
湖北医药学院附属人民医院创伤骨科
纸质出版日期:2019,
扫 描 看 全 文
肖亮, 孙晨, 孙志波, 等. 不同手术方式治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2019,(5):394.
XIAO Liang, SUN Chen, SUN Zhibo, et al. Comparison of different surgical methods for distal radius fractures[J]. null, 2019,(5):394.
目的 比较不同手术方式治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。方法 将2012年1月至2016年12月我科收治的210例桡骨远端骨折患者作为研究对象
按主要骨折块移位类型和骨折粉碎程度分为3组,其中A组58例采用背侧入路切开复位单钢板固定,B组69例采用背侧入路切开复位双钢板固定,C组83例采用掌侧入路切开复位单钢板固定。比较3组患者骨折复位效果、软组织情况、临床愈合时间、伤口感染率及腕关节功能评价的差异。结果 3组患者在桡骨高度、掌倾角和尺偏角上比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在临床愈合时间上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在肌腱刺激征上,A组明显高于B组和C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术9个月后,分别通过DASH上肢功能调查表和PRWE评分从不同侧重方向对3组腕关节功能进行评价分析,A组与B组、C组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 掌侧入路可适用于大多数桡骨远端关节内骨折,其在骨折复位、钢板放置和规避肌腱损伤等方面具有优势,但存在正中神经和桡动脉损伤风险,对手术技术有一定要求;背侧入路双钢板固定可提供双柱的稳定性、可直视关节面,对于严重粉碎背侧关节面的处理复位有一定优势,但存在伸肌腱激惹的风险;背侧单钢板固定,在固定强度和远期功能及并发症的防治上均不具有优势。手术方式的选择应结合骨折粉碎程度、移位类型、术区皮肤软组织条件以及患者对腕关节功能要求等多方面的情况来确定。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical methods in the treatment of comminuted distal radius fracture. Methods A total of 210 patients with distal radius fractures in our department from January 2012 to December 2016 were divided into group A
B
C according to fracture displacement type and degree of comminuted fracture;58 cases in group A were treated with open reduction and single plate fixation via dorsal approach
69 cases in group B were treated with open reduction and double plate fixation via dorsal approach
and 83 cases in group C were treated with open reduction and single plate fixation via volar approach.The differences of reduction effect
soft tissue condition
clinical healing time
complications and wrist joint function of the three groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in radius height
palm inclination and ulnar deviation between three groups(P>0.05).No statistical difference was found in clinical healing time(P>0.05).The tendon irritation signs of group A was significantly higher than those of group B and group C
the differences were significant(P<0.05).After 9 months of operation
DASH upper limb function questionnaire and PRWE score were used to evaluate the wrist joint function of three groups from different directions.There were statistical differences between group A and other two groups in scoring. Conclusion The volar approach can be applied to most distal radial intraarticular fractures.It has advantages in fracture reduction
plate placement and tendon injury avoidance
but there is a risk of median nerve and radial artery injury
which requires certain surgical techniques.Dorsal approach with double plate fixation can provide stability of the double column and can directly look at the joint surface.It has certain advantages for the treatment and reduction of severe crushing of the dorsal joint surface
but there is a risk of extensor tendon irritation.Dorsal single plate fixation has no advantages in fixation strength
longterm function and the prevention and treatment of complications.At the same time
there are individual differences in the choice of surgical methods
which should be determined in combination with the degree of fracture comminution
type of displacement
skin and soft tissue conditions in the operative area
as well as the patient′s requirements on wrist function and other aspects.
桡骨远端粉碎性骨折掌侧入路背侧入路切开复位内固定
comminuted distal radius fracturevolar approachdorsal approachopen reductioninternal fixation
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621