
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
河南大学淮河医院普通外科
纸质出版日期:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
窦青青, 韩吉利, 高会华. 以量化评估策略为核心的调节式护理在贲门癌术后患者护理中的应用价值[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(10):122-125.
Dou Qingqing, Han Jili, Gao Huihua. Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(10):122-125.
窦青青, 韩吉利, 高会华. 以量化评估策略为核心的调节式护理在贲门癌术后患者护理中的应用价值[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(10):122-125. DOI:
Dou Qingqing, Han Jili, Gao Huihua. Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(10):122-125. DOI:
目的 探讨以量化评估策略为核心的调节式护理对贲门癌术后患者的护理效果
以期为临床治疗提供参考。方法本研究选取2020年1月—2021年1月在河南大学淮河医院行贲门癌手术治疗的87例患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(n=43)与研究组(n=44)。对照组患者采用常规术后护理
研究组患者采用以量化评估策略为核心的调节式护理干预。比较2组患者干预前后一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、自护能力测定量表(ESCA)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)及癌症患者生活质量测定量表(QOL-C30)评分。结果 干预前
2组患者GSES及ESCA评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后
2组患者GSES及ESCA评分均高于干预前
且研究组高于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前
2组患者HAMA及HAMD评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后
2组患者HAMA及HAMD评分均低于干预前
且研究组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者并发症发生率低于对照组
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前
2组患者QOL-C30评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后
2组患者QOL-C30评分均低于干预前
且研究组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论以量化评估策略为核心的调节式护理可改善贲门癌术后患者自我效能感和自护能力
缓解患者负性情绪
减少其并发症发生
同时能提高患者生活质量
值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the effect of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer
so as to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods Eighty-seven patients who underwent cardiac cancer surgery in Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the study participants. The patients were assigned to the control group(n=43) and the experimental group(n=44) by random number table. Routine postoperative care was used in the control group
and quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care was used in the experimental group. The scores of the General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES)
Exercise of Self-Care Agency(ESCA)
Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)
Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)
and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30(QOL-C30) for cancer patient were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in GSES and ESCA scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the GSES and ESCA scores in the two groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention
with the experimental group higher than the control group(P<0.05). Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in HAMA and HAMD scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the HAMA and HAMD scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention
with the experimental group lower than the control group(P<0.05). The incidence rate of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in QOL-C30 scores between the 2 groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the QOL-C30 scores of patients in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention
with the experimental group lower than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care can improve the self-efficacy and self-care ability of patients with cardiac cancer after the operation
relieve negative emotions
reduce the occurrence of complications
and improve the quality of life. These benefits hold promise for a wider application of this procedure clinically.
贲门癌量化评估调节式护理自我效能感
Cardiac cancerQuantitative assessmentRegulated careself-efficacy
0
浏览量
3
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621