
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
河南省人民医院神经内科
纸质出版日期:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
苏娜娜, 孙慧, 郑雪芝, 等. 基于DHI评分的针对性康复训练护理在吞咽障碍患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(9):128-131.
Su Nana, Sun Hui, Zheng Xuezhi, et al. Effect of targeted rehabilitation training care in patients with dysphagia via dysphagia handicap index[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(9):128-131.
苏娜娜, 孙慧, 郑雪芝, 等. 基于DHI评分的针对性康复训练护理在吞咽障碍患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(9):128-131. DOI:
Su Nana, Sun Hui, Zheng Xuezhi, et al. Effect of targeted rehabilitation training care in patients with dysphagia via dysphagia handicap index[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(9):128-131. DOI:
目的 分析基于吞咽障碍指数问卷(DHI)评分的针对性康复训练护理在吞咽障碍患者护理中的应用效果
以期为临床相关治疗提供参考。方法 本研究选取2019年10月—2021年7月在河南省人民医院就诊的82例吞咽障碍患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组(41例)和对照组(41例)。对照组患者实施常规护理
观察组患者实施基于DHI评分的针对性康复训练护理。比较2组患者干预前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、DHI、吞咽障碍生活质量量表(SWAL-QOL)评分。比较2组患者在干预期间的并发症发生率。结果 干预前
2组患者SAS及SDS评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后
2组患者SAS及SDS评分均低于干预前
且观察组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前
2组患者DHI及SWAL-QOL评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后
2组患者DHI及SWAL-QOL评分均高于干预前
且观察组高于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 针对吞咽障碍患者采用基于DHI评分的针对性康复训练护理
能够有效缓解患者不良情绪
改善患者临床症状和生活质量
进一步降低并发症发生率
临床效果显著
值得临床推广应用。
Objective To analyze the effect of targeted rehabilitation training care in the care of patients with dysphagia via Dysphagia Handicap Index(DHI) score
so as to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods Eighty-two patients with dysphagia who visited Henan Provincial People’s Hospital from October 2019 to July 2021 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were randomly assigned to the observation group(n=41) and control group(n=41). Patients in the control group received routine care
and patients in the observation group targeted rehabilitation training care based on DHI scores. Self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)
self-rating depression scale(SDS)
DHI
and the Swallowing Quality of Life(SWAL-QOL) questionnaire scores were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The incidence of adverse reactions during the intervention was compared between the 2 groups. Results Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
SAS and SDS scores in the two groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention
with the observation group lower than the control group(P<0.05). Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in DHI and SWAL-QOL scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the DHI and SWAL-QOL scores in the two groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention
with the observation group higher than the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Targeted rehabilitation training care based on DHI scores in patients with dysphagia can effectively relieve patients’ negative emotions
ameliorate clinical symptoms
increase patients’ quality of life
and further reduce the incidence of adverse reactions
with marked clinical effects. These benefits justify a wider application of this technique in clinical practice.
吞咽障碍指数问卷针对性康复训练护理吞咽障碍
Dysphagia handicap index questionnaireTargeted rehabilitation training careDysphagia
0
浏览量
10
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621