
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
漯河医学高等专科学校第二附属医院重症医学科
纸质出版日期:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
丁亚楠, 唐海霞, 赵春红. 系统化护理在连续性肾脏替代法治疗重症急性胰腺炎中的应用[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(3):86-89.
Ding Yanan, Tang Haixia, Zhao Chunhong. Study o n the application of systematic care in continuous renal replacement therapy for severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(3):86-89.
丁亚楠, 唐海霞, 赵春红. 系统化护理在连续性肾脏替代法治疗重症急性胰腺炎中的应用[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(3):86-89. DOI:
Ding Yanan, Tang Haixia, Zhao Chunhong. Study o n the application of systematic care in continuous renal replacement therapy for severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(3):86-89. DOI:
目的 探讨系统化护理在连续性肾脏替代法(CRRT)治疗重症急性胰腺炎中的应用效果。方法选取2018年12月—2021年2月漯河市某医院收治的106例重症急性胰腺炎患者为研究对象
按随机数字表法分为系统化组(n=53)和对照组(n=53)
对照组患者予以常规护理
系统化组患者在对照组基础上予以系统化护理
2组患者均持续护理至出院。比较2组患者重症加强护理病房(ICU)住院时间、并发症发生率
比较2组患者护理前后急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE-Ⅱ)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。结果 护理前
2组患者APACHE-Ⅱ评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后
2组患者APACHE-Ⅱ评分低于护理前
且系统化组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前
2组患者SAS及SDS评分比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后
2组患者SAS及SDS评分均低于护理前
且系统化组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。系统化组患者ICU住院时间为(15.32±3.76)d
短于对照组的(19.69±3.87)d
差异有统计学意义(t=5.896
P<0.001)。系统化组患者的并发症发生率为3.77%
低于对照组的16.98%
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 系统化护理在重症急性胰腺炎患者CRRT治疗中
可有效改善患者负性情绪
缩短ICU住院时间
加快病情恢复
降低并发症发生风险
值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To explore the effect of systematic nursing in continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Methods One hundred and six patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted to a hospital in Luohe from December 2018 to February 2021 were selected for the study
and were divided into a systematic group(n=53) and a control group(n=53) according to the time of admission. Patients in the control group were given conventional care
and patients in the systematic group were given systematic care on the basis of the control group; both groups received continuous care until discharge. The length of stay in the intensive care unit(ICU) and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups
and the scores of the Acute Physical And Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE-Ⅱ)
self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and self-rating depression scale(SDS) were compared between the two groups before and after care. Results Before care
there was no statistically significant difference between the APACHE-Ⅱ scores of the 2 groups of patients(P>0.05); after care
the APACHE-Ⅱ scores of the 2 groups of patients were lower than before care and lower in the systematic group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Before care
there was no statistically significant difference between the SAS and SDS scores of patients in the 2 groups(P>0.05); after care
the SAS and SDS scores of patients in the 2 groups were lower than before care and lower in the systematic group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). The ICU stay of patients in the systematic group was 15.32±3.76 d
shorter than that of the control group(19.69±3.87 d)
and the difference was statistically significant(t=5.896
P<0.001). The complication rate of patients in the systematic group was 3.77%
which was lower than that of 16.98% in the control group
with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion Systematic care in patients with severe acute pancreatitis undergoing CRRT can effectively improve patients’ negative emotions
shorten the ICU stay
accelerate recovery
and have a lower risk of complications. It is worth promoting the use in clinical practice.
系统化护理重症急性胰腺炎连续性肾脏替代治疗并发症发生率
Systematic careSevere acute pancreatitisContinuous renal replacement therapyComplication rate
0
浏览量
59
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621