
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 西南医科大学附属医院小儿外科
2. 西南医科大学附属医院护理部
3. 西南医科大学附属医院心内科
纸质出版日期:2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]杨春,申红丽,郑思琳,刘凤,吴萍.改良尿管外固定法在住院患者尿管固定中的应用研究[J].西南医科大学学报,2020,43(03):291-295.
YANG Chun, SHEN Hongli, ZHENG Silin, et al. Application of the modified external fixation methods in urinary catheter fixation for inpatients[J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University, 2020,43(3):291-295.
目的:探讨改良尿管外固定方法与常规固定方法的差异
探索改良尿管外固定方法的优良性
以期增加尿管固定稳固性
提高护理工作效率
进行临床推广应用。方法:将2018年1月1日至2018年6月30日于西南医科大学附属医院泌尿外科、骨科、神经内科住院且符合条件的180名患者进行分组
常规组60例
螺旋固定组60例
大Ⅰ型固定组60例。比较3组患者在尿管有效固定天数、非计划性拔管(UEX)例数、医用粘胶剂相关皮肤损伤(MARSI)例数是否具有差异。结果:①尿管有效固定天数:3组患者尿管有效固定天数差异有统计学意义(P≤0.05);Ⅰ型固定组尿管固定天数最多
其次是螺旋固定组
常规组最少
差异有统计学意义(P≤0.05);②UEX发生例数:常规组尿管UEX发生例数为2(3.3%)例
螺旋固定组、大Ⅰ型固定组均为0(0.0%)例。经Fisher确切概率法比较得出
3组患者在尿管UEX发生例数的差异不具有统计学意义(P> 0.05);③MARSI发生例数:常规组患者MARSI发生人数为1(1.7%)人
螺旋固定法和大Ⅰ型固定组患者MARSI发生人数均为0(0.0%)人。经Fisher确切概率法比较得出
3组患者在MARSI发生例数的差异不具有统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论:大Ⅰ型固定法在尿管有效固定天数方面更优于螺旋固定法和常规法
可增加尿管固定牢固性
减少护理人员工作量
值得临床推广。
Objective:To investigate the advantages of the modified external fixation of urinary catheters over routine fixation
and to find a better method that can enhance catheter stability and improve nursing efficiency for clinical promotion. Methods:We enrolled 180 eligible patients who were hospitalized from January 1 to June 30
2018 in the Department of Urology
Department of Orthopedics
and Department of Neurology in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. They were randomly divided into routine group(n = 60)
spiral fixation group(n = 60)
and Ⅰ-type fixation group(n = 60). The days of effective catheter fixation
the number of cases with unplanned extubation(UEX)
and the number of cases with medical adhesive-related skin injuries(MARSI)were compared between the three groups. Results:Compared with the routine group
the spiral fixation group and the Ⅰ-type fixation group had significantly fewer cases with UEX(P < 0.05). The Ⅰ-type fixation group showed significantly more days of effective catheter fixation than the spiral fixation group and the routine group(P < 0.05). Conclusion:Both the spiral fixation and Ⅰ-type fixation methods are superior to the routine method in terms of reducing the incidence of UEX in patients with urinary catheterization. The Ⅰ-type fixation method shows an advantage in the days of effective catheter securement over the other two methods. The Ⅰ-type fixation method enhances catheter stability
decreases the incidence of UEX
and reduces nurse providers’ workload
worthy of clinical promotion.
住院患者留置尿管固定方法
InpatientUrinary catheterizationFixation method
0
浏览量
192
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621