
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
郑州大学第五附属医院药学部
纸质出版日期:2018,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]杨宜歆,滕青华,时磊.FOLFOX和FOLFIRI化疗方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本-效果分析[J].保健医学研究与实践,2018,15(06):40-44.
Yang Yixin, Teng Qinghua, Shi Lei. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2018,15(6):40-44.
[1]杨宜歆,滕青华,时磊.FOLFOX和FOLFIRI化疗方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本-效果分析[J].保健医学研究与实践,2018,15(06):40-44. DOI:
Yang Yixin, Teng Qinghua, Shi Lei. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2018,15(6):40-44. DOI:
目的探讨FOLFOX与FOLFIRI化疗方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效及成本-效果。方法选取河南省某医院肿瘤内科2015年7月-2017年12月收治的80例结直肠癌晚期患者作为研究对象
采用随机数字表法分为观察组(42例)和对照组(38例)。观察组患者采用FOLFOX化疗方案进行治疗
对照组患者采用FOLFIRI化疗方案进行治疗
连续治疗56d后评价2种化疗方案的疗效、不良反应发生情况及成本-效果(C-E)。结果观察组患者的治疗总有效率为42.8%
高于对照组的39.5%
但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者治疗第1天和第14天时CD3+
CD4+及CD8+T细胞百分比组间及组内比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者治疗后卡氏评分(KPS)提高、稳定及降低比例比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者骨髓抑制和腹泻发生率均低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗总费用少于对照组;观察组患者化疗方案成本/效果(C/E)低于对照组
且在观察组患者化疗方案基础上
PFS每增加1d
对照组患者化疗方案所追加的成本为61.8元;观察组患者化疗方案的医保和自付费用C/E均低于对照组
且PFS每增加1d
对照组患者化疗方案在观察组的基础上医保费用多支付56.1元
自付费用多支付8.1元。结论与FOLFIRI化疗方案相比
FOLFOX化疗方案治疗转移性结直肠癌C-E更佳
不良反应发生率更低
经济学效果更优。
Objective To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).Methods Eighty patients with mCRC who were treated at the Department of Oncology of a Henan hospital between July 2015 and December 2017 were included in this study.Based on a random number table
patients were allocated to receive the FOLFOX regimen(trial group
n=42)or the FOLFIRI regimen(control group
n=38)for 56 consecutive days.The efficacy
incidence of adverse events
and cost-effectiveness were assessed and compared between the two groups.Results The total response rate in the trial group was higher than that of the control group
but the difference was not statistically significant(42.8% vs.39.5%
P>0.05).At day 1 and day 14
the proportions of CD3+
CD4+and CD8+T cells generally remained unchanged from baseline values and were similar between the two groups(P>0.05).The proportions of patients whose Karnofsky performance score(KPS)increased
remained stable
or decreased were also similar between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidences of both myelosuppression and diarrhea were significantly lower in the trial group than those of the control group(P<0.05).Compared with the control group
the total cost was lower in the trial group.The C/E ratio of the FOLFOX regimen was lower than that of the FOLFIRI regimen;as compared with the FOLFOX regimen
the incremental cost per each day of progression-free survival(PFS)was RMB 61.8 yuan in the control group.In terms of both medical insurance and out-of-pocket expenditures
the C/E ratios of the FOLFOX regimen were lower than those of the FOLFIRI regimen;as compared with the FOLFOX regimen
the incremental medical insurance and out-of-pocket expenditures per each day of PFS were RMB 56.1 yuan and RMB 8.1 yuan in the control group
respectively.Conclusion Compared with the FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen
the FOLFOX regimen is more cost-effective in treating mCRC
with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and superior economic results.
转移性结直肠癌奥沙利铂伊立替康亚叶酸钙氟尿嘧啶成本-效果分析
Metastatic colorectal cancerOxaliplatinIrinotecanLeucovorinFluorouracilCost-effectiveness analysis
0
浏览量
99
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621