
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
天津海滨人民医院
纸质出版日期:2017,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]刘玉萍.依那普利联合坎地沙坦治疗陈旧性心肌梗死的临床效果[J].保健医学研究与实践,2017,14(02):47-50.
Liu Yuping. Efficacy of enalapril and candesartan in treating old myocardial infarction[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2017,14(2):47-50.
目的探讨依那普利联合坎地沙坦治疗陈旧性心肌梗死的临床效果。方法选取2015年1月-2016年2月在天津市某医院接受治疗的74例陈旧性心肌梗死患者为研究对象
采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为对照组与观察组
每组37例。对照组患者在常规治疗的基础上加用依那普利
观察组患者在常规治疗的基础上加用依那普利和坎地沙坦。比较2组患者的临床疗效、不良反应发生情况、治疗前后的心功能变化情况及血清高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平。结果治疗后
观察组患者的治疗总有效率为94.59%
高于对照组的75.68%
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者不良反应发生率均为5.41%
二者比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前
2组患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF)比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后
观察组患者的LVEF为(57.63±6.14)%
高于对照组的(52.57±5.73)%
且2组患者的LVEF均高于治疗前
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前
2组患者的血清hs-CRP水平比较
差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后
观察组患者的血清hs-CRP水平为(3.32±0.18)mg/L
低于对照组的(6.15±0.54)mg/L
且2组患者的血清hs-CRP水平均低于治疗前
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论依那普利联合坎地沙坦治疗陈旧性心肌梗死效果较好
且可改善患者的预后
值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the efficacy of enalapril and candesartan in treating old myocardial infarction(OMI).Methods From January 2015 to February 2016 atotal of 74 patients with OMI were selected and divided into control group(n=37)and observation group(n=37)by random number table.In addition to the primary medicine
enalapril was used for the control group
while enalapril and candesartan were used for the observation group besides the primary medicine.The clinic efficacy
adverse effects and changes of cardiac function and high-sensitivity c-reactive(hs-CRP)of 2groups were observed.Results After the treatment the total effective rate of control group was lower than observation group(75.68%<94.59%)and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The adverse effects of 2groups rate were 5.41%
the comparative differences were not statiscally significant(P>0.05).Before the treatment there was no significant difference between the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)(P>0.05);after the treatment the LVEF of control group and observation group were(52.57±5.73)% and(57.63±6.14)% respectively and the former is lower
also the LVEF of groups were both higher than before.And the differences were significant(P <0.05).Before the treatment there was no significant difference between the hs-CRP of 2groups(P>0.05);after the treatment the hsCRP control group and observation group were(3.32±0.18)mg/L and(6.15±0.54)mg/L respectively and the former is higher
also the hs-CRP of groups were both lower than before.And the differences were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Treating OMI with enalapril and candesartan could improve the efficacy and prognosis
worth clinical promotion.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂陈旧性心肌梗死血清高敏C反应蛋白
Angiotensin converting enzymeAngiotensin-Ⅱ receptor antagonistOld myocardial infarctionHigh-sensitivity c-reactive
0
浏览量
18
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621