
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 郑州大学第一附属医院呼吸内科
2. 漯河医学高等专科学校
纸质出版日期:2015,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]赵春玲,王玉中,余丽亚,魏兰涛,崔嬿嬿,宋惠敏,李霞.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的PiCCO及液体管理策略[J].保健医学研究与实践,2015,12(06):31-35.
Zhao Chun-ling, Wang Yu-zhong, Yu Li-ya, et al. PiCCO and Fluid Management Strategy in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2015,12(6):31-35.
目的探讨利用脉波指示剂连续心排血量监测(PiCCO)结果对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者采用不同液体管理策略的临床效果。方法将68例ARDS患者随机分为观察组和对照组(各34例)
应用PiCCO技术
分别采用限制性和非限制性液体管理措施。统计液体出入量
监测氧合指数(PaO
2
/FiO
2
)、血乳酸、中心静脉压(CVP)、股动脉平均血压(MAP)、心脏功能指数(CFI)及血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)等。记录患者ICU入住时间及机械通气时间
同时追踪患者30d生存情况。结果观察组患者第2
3
4
5
6和7天的液体净入量均少于对照组
差异有统计学意义(P
<
0.01);治疗7d后观察组患者的PaO
2
/FiO
2
升高
而血乳酸
MAP
EVLWI下降
与本组治疗前及对照组治疗后比较差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05);观察组患者ICU入住时间和15d内机械通气时间分别为(11.93±3.04)d和(10.98±1.39)h
对照组患者分别为(16.59±3.83)d和(12.97±1.76)h
2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P
<
0.05);观察组和对照组患者30d内死亡例数分别为5例和10例
累计生存率分别为85.3%(95%CI:73.34%
9
7.26%)和70.6%(95%CI:55.31%
8
5.89%)
差异无统计学意义(χ
2
=2.154
P=0.142)。结论 PiCCO能准确地监测ARDS患者的血流动力学改变
根据PiCCO监测结果
可对患者分别采用不同液体管理策略。限制性液体管理有利于肺功能的改善
缩短呼吸机的使用时间和ICU入住时间
但是否能提高患者的近期生存率尚有待进一步探讨。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of different fluid management strategies on acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)patients according to the results of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output(PiCCO)monitoring.Methods 68 cases of ARDS patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group(34cases in each group)and were taken respectively restrictive and non-restrictive fluid management measures with the application of PiCCO technology to record the amount of fluid intake and output
monitor oxygenation index(PaO
2
/FiO
2
)
blood lactate
central venous pressure(CVP)
femoral artery mean blood pressure(MAP)
cardiac function index(CFI)and extravascular lung water index(EVLWI)
record the time of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation
and track their 30-day survival of patients.ResultsIn the observation group
the net input volume of fluid on the second
third
fourth
fifth
sixth and seventh days was less than the control group
and the difference was statistically significant(P
<
0.01);after 7-day treatment
PaO
2
/FiO
2
of patients in the observation group increased while their blood lactate
MAP and EVLWI declined
compared with before its treatment and the control group after treatment
the differences were statistically significant(P
<
0.05);the time of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation within 15 days in the observation group were respectively(11.93±3.04)days and(10.98±1.39)hours
while those of the control group were(16.59±3.83)days and(12.97±1.76)hours
and there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(P
<
0.05);within 30 days
there were 5and 10 cases of death in the observation group and the control group
their cumulative survival rates were 85.3%(95% CI:73.34%
9
7.26%)and 70.6%(95% CI:55.31%
8
5.89%)
and the difference was not statistically significant(χ
2
=2.154
P=0.142).Conclusion PiCCO can accurately monitor the changes of hemodynamics in patients with ARDS and according to PiCCO monitoring results
we may adopt different fluid management strategies on patients.Restrictive fluid management can help to improve patients′pulmonary function
shorten the use of mechanical ventilator and the time of ICU stay
but whether it can improve the recent survival rate in patients or not must be further explored.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征液体管理护理肺功能临床疗效
Acute respiratory distress syndromeFluid managementNursingPulmonary functionClinical efficacy
0
浏览量
139
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621