An evaluation of the role of various treatments for advanced esophageal carcinoma

CHEN Shifeng; et al

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

An evaluation of the role of various treatments for advanced esophageal carcinoma

更新时间：2024-01-17

- An evaluation of the role of various treatments for advanced esophageal carcinoma
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Issue 3, Pages: 320-321(2002)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆医科大学第二临床学院心胸外科
  2. 重庆绒布总厂职工医院,重庆,400010
  3. ,重庆,400700
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： R735.1
- Published：2002，
扫描看全文
[1]陈诗奉,江跃全,黄绍生.晚期食管癌三种疗法的对照研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2002(03):320-321.

CHEN Shifeng, et al. An evaluation of the role of various treatments for advanced esophageal carcinoma. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (3):320-321(2002)
[1]陈诗奉,江跃全,黄绍生.晚期食管癌三种疗法的对照研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2002(03):320-321. DOI：

CHEN Shifeng, et al. An evaluation of the role of various treatments for advanced esophageal carcinoma. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (3):320-321(2002) DOI：

摘要

目的:探讨晚期食管癌三种疗法的疗效。方法:例晚期食管癌

采用胃造瘘例（组）

食管支架例（9216A27B组）

食管切除例（组）三种疗法。对组的住院费用

手术并发症

死亡率

术后生存时间进行对照分析。49C3结果:、A组术后无严重并发症和死亡发生

组术后并发症和死亡率分别为和。组住院费±元明显低于BC14.29%6.12%A（1756.56151.09）组（±元）及组（±元）

但生活质量差

年生存率（）明显低于组（）B9437.50889.85C20487.507108.39118.75%B74.07%C组（）

与、组相比差异显著（60.87%BCP<）

、组年生存率无明显差异（0.01BC1P>）。0.05结论:晚期食管癌手术应慎重

食管支架置入是治疗的最佳选择。

Abstract

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of the three types of the treatment for advanced esophageal carcinoma. Methods: 92 patients (78 men and 14 women) were involved in this study. Patients were divided into three groups. Group A (n=16) gastrostomy

group B (n=27) esophageal stent implanted

group C (n= 49) esophagectomy . A comparative study was made in several aspects including the total charges

the incidenc of complications

an operative mortality and postoperative survival rate. Results: No severe postoperative 、complications and hospital deaths occurred in groups AB

but in group C the complications and deaths rate were 、、$14.29%

6.12% respectively. Hospital cost in groups ABC were 1756.56±$151.09

9437.50±$889.85

20568.50±7108.39 respectively (P<0.01). But the one-year survival rate in group A (18.75%) was lower than that in groups B (74.07%) and C (60.87%)

P<0.01

and there was no significant difference between the groups B and C ( >P0.05). Conclusion: The esophageal stent implanted for advanced esophageal carcinoma is an effective and safe method and esophagectomy should be selected carefully.

关键词

晚期食管癌支架外科治疗疗效

Keywords

Advanced esophageal carcinomastentsurgical treatmenttherapeutic effect

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of primary mediastinal tumors and cysts: A report of 272 cases

Evaluation of membrane-covered self-expanding stent in clinical use

Clinical observation of the therapeutic effect of biofeedback therapy training on patients with neurosis

Treatment of high-positioned esophageal diseases with membrane-covered self-expanding stents

Selection of treating methods for acute aortic dissection

Related Author

温剑虎

李良彬

吴庆琛

葛明建

杜铭

温剑虎

李良彬

et al

Related Institution

重庆医科大学临床学院胸心外科

Department of Thoracic Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University

重庆医科大学临床学院精神科

Department of Psychiatry, College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,College of Clinical Medicine,Chongqing Medical University

⁰