
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京大学第一医院儿童医学中心,北京 102627
2.北京大学人民医院儿科,北京 100044
3.北京大学第三医院儿科,北京 100191
4.北京大学基础医学院,北京 100191
桑田,Email:sangtian@bjmu.edu.cn
收稿日期:2025-02-19,
纸质出版日期:2025-04-20
移动端阅览
广诗琦, 桑田, 曾超美, 等. 翻转课堂教学在临床医学八年制儿科学见习中的应用及评价[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2025, 24(4): 453-459.
广诗琦, 桑田, 曾超美, 等. 翻转课堂教学在临床医学八年制儿科学见习中的应用及评价[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2025, 24(4): 453-459. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20250219-02026.
目的
2
探讨翻转课堂教学法在儿科学见习中的应用及师生评价,为优化临床医学教育策略提供依据。
方法
2
选取北京大学医学部2019级临床医学八年制四年级学生(
n
=174)和授课教师(
n
=42)为研究对象,通过问卷调查结合出科考核成绩对翻转课堂的应用进行评价。使用SPSS 26.0软件进行统计学分析,应用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn多重比较分析翻转课堂各环节的满意度差异;通过卡方检验和Fisher确切概率法检验比较高分组(成绩前30%)与低分组(成绩后30%)的满意度差异。
结果
2
①学生对翻转课堂的总体满意度达91.33%(非常满意+满意);其中对课前自学视频(80.35%),教师推荐的临床指南(82.80%)和英文文献(71.10%)等环节满意度较高,但对翻转大课授课环节的满意度相对较低(52.60%),与其他教学环节差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。②高分组学生对翻
转课堂各环节满意度低于低分组,差异有统计学意义(总体评价:84.61% vs. 98.08%,Fisher确切概率法检验,
P
=0.031;课前视频:53.85% vs. 76.92%,
χ
²=6.12,
P
=0.013;预习作业:61.54% vs. 80.77%,
χ
²=4.68,
P
=0.030;英文文献:53.85% vs. 75.00%,
χ
²=5.80,
P
=0.016;翻转大课:36.54% vs. 59.62%,
χ
²=5.55,
P
=0.019)。③71.68%的学生认为翻转课堂可同时提升2项以上核心能力,包括理论知识学习能力(49.71%)、自主学习能力(35.84%)、临床思维能力(31.21%)、科研能力(25.43%)和语言表达能力(22.54%)等。④教师反馈显示,83.33%的教师认可翻转课堂的教学效果达到或超越传统教学模式,在临床思维(90.48%)、自主学习(85.71%)、理论知识学习(76.19%)和语言表达(76.19%)等能力的培养方面有帮助。⑤影响学生参与翻转课堂的意愿主要与课前学习时间有关(46.51%的学生认为准备课上讨论内容比较耗费精力);而教师参与意愿则主要取决于翻转课堂的实施效果(42.86%)和教学内容设计(35.71%)。
结论
2
翻转课堂教学在儿科学见习中的应用取得了良好的初期成效,师生总体满意度较高,但在教学环节优化、差异化教学设计及时间成本控制等方面仍需进一步探索与实践。
Objective
2
To explore the application of the flipped classroom teaching method in pediatric internship
evaluate the feedback from both students and faculty
and provide evidence for optimizing clinical medical education strategies.
Methods
2
Fourth-year students (
n
=174) enrolled in 2019 in the eight-year clinical medicine program at Peking University Health Science Center and instructors (
n
=42) participated in this study. Questionnaire survey and exit examination scores were used to assess the effectiveness of the flipped classroom method. A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0. Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparisons were used to evaluate the differences in satisfaction across teaching components. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied to compare satisfaction between high-score (top 30%) and low-score (bottom 30%) student groups.
Results
2
①Overall student satisfaction with the flipped classroom reached 91.33% ("very satisfied" + "satisfied"). High satisfaction was reported for pre-class self-learni
ng videos (80.35%)
recommended clinical guidelines (82.80%)
and English literature (71.10%)
while satisfaction with the flipped classroom lectures was comparatively low (52.60%)
with significant differences compared to other components (
P
<
0.05). ②High-score students exhibited significantly lower satisfaction than low-score students across all components (overall evaluation
84.61% vs. 98.08%
Fisher's exact test
P
=0.031; pre-class videos
53.85% vs. 76.92%
χ
²=6.12
P
=0.013; preparatory assignments
61.54% vs. 80.77%
χ
²=4.68
P
=0.030; English literature
53.85% vs. 75.00%
χ²
=5.80
P
=0.016; and flipped class lectures
36.54% vs. 59.62%
χ
²=5.55
P
=0.019). ③Enhanced competency in ≥2 core areas was reported in 71.68% of students
including theoretical knowledge acquisition (49.71%)
self-directed learning (35.84%)
clinical thinking (31.21%)
research capabilities (25.43%)
and communication skills (22.54%). ④Faculty feedback indicated that 83.33% of instructors perceived the flipped classroom as equivalent or superior to traditional teaching
particularly in cultivating clinical thinking (90.48%)
self-directed learning (85.71%)
theoretical knowledge acquisition (76.19%)
and communication skills (76.19%). ⑤Student participation willingness was primarily influenced by pre-class time investment (46.51% reported excessive effort in preparing discussion materials)
while faculty engagement depended on implementation effectiveness (42.86%) and curriculum design (35.71%).
Conclusions
2
The flipped classroom method demonstrated promising initial outcomes in pediatric internship
with high satisfaction among both students and faculty. However
further exploration and practice are required in optimizing teaching components
implementing differentiated instructional strategies
and managing time investment.
张清友 , 陈永红 , 王玉燕 . 儿科学临床见习教学中的问题与对策 [J ] . 中华医学教育杂志 , 2008 , 28 ( 6 ): 94 - 96 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2008.06.036 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2008.06.036 .
Bergmann J , Sams A . Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement, International Society for Technology in Education [M ] . Eugene, Oregon and Washington , DC , 2017 . DOI: 10.25656/01:14943 http://dx.doi.org/10.25656/01:14943 .
Gray MM , Dadiz R , Izatt S , et al . Comparison of knowledge acquisition and retention following traditional didactic vs . flipped classroom education utilizing a standardized national curriculum: a randomized controlled trial [J ] . J Perinatol , 2022 , 42 ( 11 ): 1512- 1518. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01423-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01423-4 .
Lu RY , Yanovitch T , Enyedi L , et al . The flipped-classroom approach to teaching horizontal strabismus in ophthalmology residency: a multicentered randomized controlled study [J ] . J AAPOS , 2021 , 25 ( 3 ): 137.e1 - 137137.e6 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.01.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.01.008 .
Huang HL , Chou CP , Leu S , et al . Effects of a quasi-experimental study of using flipped classroom approach to teach evidence-based medicine to medical technology students [J ] . BMC Med Educ , 2020 , 20 ( 1 ): 31 . DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1946-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1946-7 .
郝琎琎 , 杨光耀 , 刘亚玲 , 等 . 基于微课的翻转课堂在儿科住院医师规范化培训床边实践教学中的应用 [J ] . 中华医学教育探索杂志 , 2020 , 19 ( 2 ): 203 - 208 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2020.02.020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2020.02.020 .
李薇薇 , 刘亚丽 , 熊若男 , 等 . 基于翻转课堂的混合式教学模式在儿科住院医师规范化培训中的应用效果 [J ] . 中国民康医学 , 2024 , 36 ( 5 ): 139 - 141, 149 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2024.05.041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2024.05.041 .
刘宇 , 周戬平 , 王雪莹 , 等 . 翻转课堂教学模式在儿科学教学中的应用探索 [J ] . 西部素质教育 , 2023 , 9 ( 19 ): 139 - 143 . DOI: 10.16681/j.cnki.wcqe.202319034 http://dx.doi.org/10.16681/j.cnki.wcqe.202319034 .
刘运翠 , 李文杰 , 常煜胤 , 等 . 翻转课堂在儿科住院医师规范化培训中的应用 [J ] . 继续医学教育 , 2022 , 36 ( 8 ): 67 - 70 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2022.08.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2022.08.018 .
El-Sayed REH , El-Sayed SEAE . Video-based lectures: an emerging paradigm for teaching human anatomy and physiology to student nurses [J ] . Alex J Med , 2013 , 49 ( 3 ): 215 - 222 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2012.11.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2012.11.002 .
Davies RS , Dean DL , Ball N . Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course [J ] . Educ Technol Res Dev , 2013 , 61 ( 4 ): 563 - 580 . DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 .
Tang F , Chen C , Zhu Y , et al . Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship [J ] . Med Educ Online , 2017 , 22 ( 1 ): 1395679 . DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679 .
Zeng R , Xiang LR , Yue RZ , et al . Friend or foe? flipped classroom for undergraduate electrocardiogram learning: a randomized controlled study [J ] . BMC Med Educ , 2017 , 17 ( 1 ): 53 . DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0881-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0881-8 .
Prober CG , Heath C . Lecture halls without lectures: a proposal for medical education [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2012 , 366 ( 18 ): 1657 - 1659 . DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1202451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1202451 .
Lau MN , Sivarajan S , Kamarudin Y , et al . Students' perception on flipped classroom in contrast to live demonstration for teaching orthodontic wire-bending skills: a focus group study [J ] . J Dent Educ , 2022 , 86 ( 11 ): 1477 - 1487 . DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12954 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621